Literature DB >> 22579933

The effect of biting tails and having tails bitten in pigs.

Manja Zupan1, Andrew M Janczak, Tore Framstad, Adroaldo J Zanella.   

Abstract

Tail-biting is a behavioral abnormality which compromises the welfare of pigs. The goal of this study was to characterize the tail-biting phenotype using behavior and measures of heart-rate (HR) and its variability (HRV) in pigs. Thirty pigs were categorized as tail-biters (n=10), tail-bite victims (n=10), and control pigs (n=10) based on the frequency of tail-biting behavior that they performed or received at the farm. The animals' behavioral responses were registered at the experimental facilities for 10 min during test sessions whereas physiological responses were registered for 10 min prior to (basal) and during sessions when subjected to a novel object test (NOT) and to a novel arena test (NAT). Phenotypes differed in most behaviors during the two tests and in the NOT their physiological responses suggested different regulation of vagal tone. Biters had a reduction from baseline values to values during testing for the root mean square of successive R-R intervals (RMSSD) and the high-frequency band (HF) compared to victims, whose RMSSD and HF increased from baseline to test values. In the low-frequency band (LF), an increase was shown in biters and controls while a decrease in victims. LF was found to be strongly positively correlated with HF and RMSSD in biters. During baseline, victims tended to have lower HF and significantly higher power of the low-frequency component divided by power of the high-frequency band (LF:HF ratio) compared to biters and controls. The activity of the autonomic nervous system, especially the suppression of parasympathetic tone, indicated that both victims and biters may have a dysfunctional autonomic regulation which may indicate psychological disturbance. We provide the first documentation of phenotypic differences between pigs that have performed tail-biting, have been victimized, or have not been involved in tail biting using HRV data.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22579933     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  12 in total

1.  Identification of chromosomal locations associated with tail biting and being a victim of tail-biting behaviour in the domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus).

Authors:  Kaitlin Wilson; Ricardo Zanella; Carlos Ventura; Hanne Lind Johansen; Tore Framstad; Andrew Janczak; Adroaldo J Zanella; Holly Louise Neibergs
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  The prospects of selection for social genetic effects to improve welfare and productivity in livestock.

Authors:  Esther D Ellen; T Bas Rodenburg; Gerard A A Albers; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Irene Camerlink; Naomi Duijvesteijn; Egbert F Knol; William M Muir; Katrijn Peeters; Inonge Reimert; Ewa Sell-Kubiak; Johan A M van Arendonk; Jeroen Visscher; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Tail biting in pigs: blood serotonin and fearfulness as pieces of the puzzle?

Authors:  Winanda W Ursinus; Cornelis G Van Reenen; Inonge Reimert; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Mutilating Procedures, Management Practices, and Housing Conditions That May Affect the Welfare of Farm Animals: Implications for Welfare Research.

Authors:  Rebecca E Nordquist; Franz Josef van der Staay; Frank J C M van Eerdenburg; Francisca C Velkers; Lisa Fijn; Saskia S Arndt
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Save the pig tail.

Authors:  Anna Valros; Mari Heinonen
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2015-04-16

6.  Review: Early life predisposing factors for biting in pigs.

Authors:  A Prunier; X Averos; I Dimitrov; S A Edwards; E Hillmann; M Holinger; V Ilieski; R Leming; C Tallet; S P Turner; M Zupan; I Camerlink
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Providing live black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens) improves welfare while maintaining performance of piglets post-weaning.

Authors:  Allyson F Ipema; Eddie A M Bokkers; Walter J J Gerrits; Bas Kemp; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Human analogue safe haven effect of the owner: behavioural and heart rate response to stressful social stimuli in dogs.

Authors:  Márta Gácsi; Katalin Maros; Sofie Sernkvist; Tamás Faragó; Adám Miklósi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Indirect genetic effects for growth rate in domestic pigs alter aggressive and manipulative biting behaviour.

Authors:  Irene Camerlink; Winanda W Ursinus; Piter Bijma; Bas Kemp; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  Effects of 20-day litter weight on weaned piglets' fighting behavior after group mixing and on heart rate variability in an isolation test.

Authors:  YaNan Sun; XinMing Lian; YuKun Bo; YuGuang Guo; PeiShi Yan
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-05-22       Impact factor: 2.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.