Literature DB >> 22579492

Real-time prediction of waiting time in the emergency department, using quantile regression.

Yan Sun1, Kiok Liang Teow, Bee Hoon Heng, Chee Kheong Ooi, Seow Yian Tay.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Emergency department (ED) waiting times can affect patient satisfaction and quality of care. We develop and validate a model that predicts an individual patient's median and 95th percentile waiting time by using only data available at triage.
METHODS: From the existing ED information system, we extracted date and time of triage completion, start time of emergency physician consultation, and patient acuity category (1=most urgent, 3=least urgent). Quantile regression was applied for model development and parameter estimation by using visits from January 2011. We assessed absolute prediction error, defined as the median difference between the 50th percentile (median) predicted waiting time and actual waiting time, and the proportion of underestimated prediction, defined as the percentage of patients whose actual waiting time exceeded the 95th percentile prediction. The model was validated retrospectively with June 2010 data and prospectively with data from April to June 2011 after integration with the existing ED information system.
RESULTS: The derivation set included 13,200 ED visits; 903 (6.8%) were patient acuity category 1, 5,530 (41.9%) were patient acuity category 2, and 6,767 (51.3%) were patient acuity category 3. The median and 95th percentile waiting times were 17 and 57 minutes for patient acuity category 2 and 21 and 89 minutes for patient acuity category 3, respectively. The final model used predictors of patient acuity category, patient queue sizes, and flow rates only. In the retrospective validation, 5.9% of patient acuity category 2 and 5.4% of category 3 waiting times were underestimated. The median absolute prediction error was 11.9 minutes (interquantile range [IQR] 5.9 to 22.1 minutes) for patient acuity category 2 and 15.7 minutes (IQR 7.5 to 30.1 minutes) for category 3. In prospective validation, 4.3% of patient acuity category 2 and 5.8% of category 3 waiting times were underestimated. The median absolute prediction error was 9.2 minutes (IQR 4.4 to 15.1 minutes) for patient acuity category 2 and 12.9 minutes (IQR 6.5 to 22.5 minutes) for category 3.
CONCLUSION: Using only a few data elements available at triage, the model predicts individual patients' waiting time with good accuracy.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22579492     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  10 in total

1.  Analysis of patient waiting time governed by a generic maximum waiting time policy with general phase-type approximations.

Authors:  Fanwen Meng; Kiok Liang Teow; Chee Kheng Ooi; Bee Hoon Heng; Seow Yian Tay
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2014-11-26

2.  A cost sensitive inpatient bed reservation approach to reduce emergency department boarding times.

Authors:  Shanshan Qiu; Ratna Babu Chinnam; Alper Murat; Bassam Batarse; Hakimuddin Neemuchwala; Will Jordan
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2014-05-09

3.  Lack of gender disparities in emergency department triage of acute stroke patients.

Authors:  Tracy E Madsen; Esther K Choo; Todd A Seigel; Danielle Palms; Brian Silver
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-12-01

4.  Impact of a New Medical Record System for Emergency Departments Designed to Accelerate Clinical Documentation: A Crossover Study.

Authors:  Ryota Inokuchi; Hajime Sato; Masao Iwagami; Yohei Komaru; Satoshi Iwai; Masataka Gunshin; Kensuke Nakamura; Kazuaki Shinohara; Yoichi Kitsuta; Susumu Nakajima; Naoki Yahagi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Multistate model of the patient flow process in the pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Anqi Liu; David M Kline; Guy N Brock; Bema K Bonsu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Artificial intelligence-assisted reduction in patients' waiting time for outpatient process: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Li; Dan Tian; Weihua Li; Bin Dong; Hansong Wang; Jiajun Yuan; Biru Li; Lei Shi; Xulin Lin; Liebin Zhao; Shijian Liu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Machine learning-based forecasting of firemen ambulances' turnaround time in hospitals, considering the COVID-19 impact.

Authors:  Selene Cerna; Héber H Arcolezi; Christophe Guyeux; Guillaume Royer-Fey; Céline Chevallier
Journal:  Appl Soft Comput       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Clinical Characteristics and Management of Angioedema Attacks in Polish Adult Patients with Hereditary Angioedema Due to C1-Inhibitor Deficiency.

Authors:  Katarzyna Piotrowicz-Wójcik; Małgorzata Bulanda; Aldona Juchacz; Joanna Jamróz-Brzeska; Jacek Gocki; Krzysztof Kuziemski; Robert Pawłowicz; Grzegorz Porebski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Unplanned 3-day re-attendance rate at Emergency Department (ED) and hospital's bed occupancy rate (BOR).

Authors:  Yan Sun; Bee Hoon Heng; Seow Yian Tay; Kelvin Brian Tan
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-08-25

10.  The use of quantile regression to forecast higher than expected respiratory deaths in a daily time series: a study of New York City data 1987-2000.

Authors:  Ireneous N Soyiri; Daniel D Reidpath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.