Literature DB >> 22578835

Diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for submucosal palatal tumors.

Hidenobu Matsuzaki1, Yoshinobu Yanagi, Marina Hara, Naoki Katase, Miki Hisatomi, Teruhisa Unetsubo, Hironobu Konouchi, Toshihiko Takenobu, Hitoshi Nagatsuka, Jun-ichi Asaumi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for differentiating between benign and malignant tumors in the palate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 26 patients with submucosal palatal tumors were preoperatively examined using DCE-MRI. Their maximum contrast index (CImax), time of CImax (Tmax), and washout ratios (WR300 and WR600) were determined from contrast index curves. The submucosal palatal tumors were divided into two groups according to their Tmax values: the early enhancement group (Tmax<300 s) consisted of 9 malignant tumors and 6 benign tumors, while the late enhancement group (Tmax≥300 s) included one malignant tumor and 10 benign tumors. We compared the following DCE-MRI parameters between the benign and malignant tumors: CImax and Tmax in all cases and CImax, Tmax, and the washout ratios in the early enhancement group. In addition, we performed a regression analysis of the relationships between tumor size and DCE-MRI parameters; i.e., CImax, Tmax, and washout ratios, among the malignant salivary gland tumors and pleomorphic adenomas.
RESULTS: In all cases and the early enhancement group, significant differences in Tmax were detected between the benign and malignant tumors (P<0.001 and P<0.05, respectively), and the optimal Tmax cutoff value for differentiating between them was found to be 165 s. None of the other parameters displayed significant differences between the benign and malignant tumors. Only the WR600 of the pleomorphic adenomas was significantly correlated with tumor size (R2=0.92, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Tmax is a useful parameter for distinguishing between benign and malignant submucosal palatal tumors.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22578835     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  3 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer: Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  S Gaddikeri; R S Gaddikeri; T Tailor; Y Anzai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Differentiating benign and malignant salivary gland tumours: diagnostic criteria and the accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with high temporal resolution.

Authors:  P D Lam; A Kuribayashi; A Imaizumi; J Sakamoto; Y Sumi; N Yoshino; T Kurabayashi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging accuracy for diagnosis of oral cancer.

Authors:  Marcelo Aldrighi Moreira; Luiza Silveira Lessa; Francieli Regina Bortoli; Abigail Lopes; Eduardo Picolo Xavier; Renan Antonio Ceretta; Fernanda Guglielmi Faustini Sônego; Cristiane Damiani Tomasi; Patricia Duarte Simões Pires; Luciane Bisognin Ceretta; Ingrid Dalira Schweigert Perry; Priscyla Waleska Simões
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.