Literature DB >> 22578631

One year postoperative hard and soft tissue volumetric changes after a BSSO mandibular advancement.

T J J Maal1, M J J de Koning, J M Plooij, L M Verhamme, F A Rangel, S J Bergé, W A Borstlap.   

Abstract

In this study, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and three dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry are used to compare the 3D skeletal and soft tissue changes caused by a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) 1 year after a mandibular advancement. Eighteen consecutive patients with a hypoplastic mandible were treated with a BSSO according to the Hunsuck modification. Preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, a CBCT scan was acquired and a 3D photograph. The pre- and postoperative CBCT scans were matched using voxel based registration. After registration, the mandible could be segmented in the pre- and postoperative scans. The preoperative scan was subtracted from the postoperative scan, resulting in the hard tissue difference. To investigate the soft tissue changes, the pre- and postoperative 3D photographs were registered using surface based registration. After registration the preoperative surface could be subtracted from the postoperative surface, resulting in the overall volumetric difference. As expected, a correlation between mandibular advancent and volumetric changes of the hard tissues was found. The correlation between advancement and soft tissues was weak. The labial mental fold stretched after surgery. This study proved that using 3D imaging techniques it is possible to document volumetric surgical changes accurately and objectively.
Copyright © 2012 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22578631     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  6 in total

1.  Temporomandibular joint condylar changes following maxillomandibular advancement and articular disc repositioning.

Authors:  Joao Roberto Goncalves; Larry Miller Wolford; Daniel Serra Cassano; Guilherme da Porciuncula; Beatriz Paniagua; Lucia Helena Cevidanes
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 2.  Computed tomography imaging superimposition protocols to assess outcomes in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review with comprehensive recommendations.

Authors:  Fernando de Oliveira Andriola; Orion Luiz Haas Junior; Raquel Guijarro-Martínez; Federico Hernández-Alfaro; Rogério Belle de Oliveira; Rogério Miranda Pagnoncelli; Gwen Rj Swennen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Facial soft tissue response to maxillo-mandibular advancement in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients.

Authors:  Julio Cifuentes; Christian Teuber; Alfredo Gantz; Ariel Barrera; Gholamreza Danesh; Nicolas Yanine; Carsten Lippold
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Three-dimensional region-based study on the relationship between soft and hard tissue changes after orthognathic surgery in patients with prognathism.

Authors:  Lun-Jou Lo; Jing-Ling Weng; Cheng-Ting Ho; Hsiu-Hsia Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  "Direct DICOM Slice Landmarking" A Novel Research Technique to Quantify Skeletal Changes in Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Anas Almukhtar; Balvinder Khambay; Ashraf Ayoub; Xiangyang Ju; Ali Al-Hiyali; James Macdonald; Norhayati Jabar; Tazuko Goto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of the accuracy of voxel based registration and surface based registration for 3D assessment of surgical change following orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Anas Almukhtar; Xiangyang Ju; Balvinder Khambay; James McDonald; Ashraf Ayoub
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.