Literature DB >> 22578136

Thickness and tension of the gluteal aponeurosis and the implications for subfascial gluteal augmentation.

Se Won Hwang1, Yong Seok Nam, Kun Hwang, Seung Ho Han.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to elucidate the thickness and tension of the gluteal aponeurosis (GA) as related to subfascial gluteal augmentation. Twenty buttocks from 10 Korean fresh cadavers (age range: 69-92 years, five men and five women) were dissected. Five radial lines were made from the greater trochanter (GT) to the highest point of origin of the gluteus maximus muscle (GM), the posterior inferior iliac spine (PSIS), the piriformis line (P), the coccyx (Co) and the ischial tuberosity (IT). The upper four lines were intersected by three curvilinear lines that divided them by a quarter, half and three-quarters ratios, and the lowest line was divided by a third ratio and a two-thirds ratio. At the 14 intersecting points, the force needed to break the 6 mm width of the GA was measured. The thickness of the GA was also measured with a digital caliper. The GA was widest at the GT-Co line (161.7±15.8 mm), and it was narrowest at the GT-IT line (106.5±21.2 mm). At most of the points (12 among the 14 points), the breaking strength of the GA was greater than 20 Newtons (N). The breaking strength of the GA did not vary significantly according to the locations (P=0.568, anova). The breaking strength of the males (22.8±6.6 N) was significantly greater than that of the females (20.3±7.5 N, P=0.003, t-test). The thickness of the GA varied according to the locations (0.4±0.2 mm to 0.7±0.3 mm). The thickness of the GA of the upper part (GT-GM line: 0.64±0.24 mm; GT-PSIS line: 0.66±0.23 mm; GT-P line: 0.66±0.24 mm) was significantly greater (P=0.040, 0.017, 0.018, respectively) than that of the lower part (GT-IT line: 0.49±0.18 mm). The GA of the males (0.70±0.23 mm) was significantly thicker than that of the females (0.53±0.21 mm, P<0.001, t-test). We conclude that the GA is capable of holding gluteal implants in the proper position, as the average force to break up the 6 mm width of the GA in females was greater than 20 N.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Anatomy © 2012 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22578136      PMCID: PMC3390535          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01510.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  6 in total

1.  Subfascial gluteal augmentation.

Authors:  J Abel de la Peña; Omar V Rubio; Jacobo P Cano; Mariana C Cedillo; Miriam T Garcés
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.017

2.  Subfascial technique for gluteal augmentation.

Authors:  José Abel de la Peña
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.283

3.  Gluteoplasty: a ten-year report.

Authors:  M González-Ulloa
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Intramuscular gluteal implants.

Authors:  R Vergara; M Marcos
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  The intramuscular course of the inferior gluteal nerve in the gluteus maximus muscle and augmentation gluteoplasty.

Authors:  Kun Hwang; Yong Seok Nam; Seung Ho Han; Se Won Hwang
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Intramuscular gluteal implants: 15 years' experience.

Authors:  Rafael Vergara; Hugo Amezcua
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.283

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Morphological and mechanical properties of the human triceps surae aponeuroses taken from elderly cadavers: Implications for muscle-tendon interactions.

Authors:  Xiyao Shan; Shun Otsuka; Tomiko Yakura; Munekazu Naito; Takashi Nakano; Yasuo Kawakami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.