Literature DB >> 22577909

Elimination of teicoplanin by adsorption to the filter membrane during haemodiafiltration: screening experiments for linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin followed by in vitro haemodiafiltration models for teicoplanin.

Y Shiraishi1, M Okajima, Y Sai, K Miyamoto, H Inaba.   

Abstract

Pharmaceutical agents directed against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus can be eliminated during haemodiafiltration, not only by diffusion and ultrafiltration, but also by adsorption onto haemofilters. The latter may be affected by the binding of agents to serum albumin. The present study therefore investigated the affinity of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents (teicoplanin, linezolid, vancomycin) for haemofilters and the pharmacokinetic properties of teicoplanin during haemodiafiltration. Linezolid, teicoplanin and vancomycin were first screened for their in vitro affinity for three different kinds of filter membranes: polysulfone, polyacrylonitrile and polymethylmethacrylate. Only teicoplanin showed significant filter-binding activity. An in vitro haemodiafiltration circulation model was then developed that incorporated a one-litre beaker containing Krebs-Ringer's bicarbonate solution with/without human albumin (0 or 3 g/dl) as an artificial plasma. Teicoplanin (initial concentration 50 µg/ml, representing the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) resulting from a typical clinical dosage) was circulated throughout the beaker. Teicoplanin concentrations in the 'plasma' and ultrafiltrate were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. In the screening experiment, teicoplanin was predominantly adsorbed onto polysulfone and polymethylmethacrylate membranes. Furthermore, teicoplanin was primarily eliminated by adsorption onto these filters during in vitro haemodiafiltration. Albumin significantly reduced both haemodiafiltration clearance and the adsorption-dependent elimination, although there were complex but significant interactions between albumin and the filter membrane. Elimination of teicoplanin in an in vitro haemodiafiltration model was largely due to adsorption onto polysulfone and polymethylmethacrylate haemofilters. Future clinical studies should likely be designed to evaluate present recommendations of teicoplanin dosages in patients on haemodiafiltration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22577909     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1204000309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  8 in total

1.  In vitro Evaluation of Linezolid and Doripenem Clearance with Different Hemofilters.

Authors:  Toshihisa Hiraiwa; Kazuhiro Moriyama; Kana Matsumoto; Yasuyo Shimomura; Yu Kato; Chizuru Yamashita; Yoshitaka Hara; Takahiro Kawaji; Yasuyoshi Kurimoto; Tomoyuki Nakamura; Naohide Kuriyama; Junpei Shibata; Hidefumi Komura; Kunihiko Morita; Osamu Nishida
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.614

2.  Pharmacokinetics of Commonly Used Medications in Children Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Systematic Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Samuel Dubinsky; Kevin Watt; Steven Saleeb; Bilal Ahmed; Caitlin Carter; Cindy H T Yeung; Andrea Edginton
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin: a consensus review by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Authors:  Yuki Hanai; Yoshiko Takahashi; Takashi Niwa; Toshihiko Mayumi; Yukihiro Hamada; Toshimi Kimura; Kazuaki Matsumoto; Satoshi Fujii; Yoshio Takesue
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Optimization of anti-infective dosing regimens during online haemodiafiltration.

Authors:  Nynke G L Jager; Anthe S Zandvliet; Daniel J Touw; Erik L Penne
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2017-03-29

5.  Comparison of adsorption of selected antibiotics on the filters in continuous renal replacement therapy circuits: in vitro studies.

Authors:  Dariusz Onichimowski; Hubert Ziółkowski; Krzysztof Nosek; Jerzy Jaroszewski; Elżbieta Rypulak; Mirosław Czuczwar
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 1.731

6.  An Integrated Dialysis Pharmacometric (IDP) Model to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics in Patients Undergoing Renal Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Astrid Broeker; Matthias G Vossen; Florian Thalhammer; Steven C Wallis; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Sebastian G Wicha
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Adsorption of vancomycin, gentamycin, ciprofloxacin and tygecycline on the filters in continuous renal replacement therapy circuits: in full blood in vitro study.

Authors:  Dariusz Onichimowski; Krzysztof Nosek; Hubert Ziółkowski; Jerzy Jaroszewski; Aleksandra Pawlos; Mirosław Czuczwar
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 1.731

8.  Efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesilate anticoagulation in blood purification treatment of critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yao Lin; Yiming Shao; Yuchun Liu; Ruoxuan Yang; Shuanglin Liao; Shuai Yang; Mingwei Xu; Junbing He
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 3.222

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.