BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Widespread resistance to antimalarial drugs requires combination therapies with increasing risk of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. Here, we explore the capacity of antimalarial drugs to induce drug metabolism via activation of constitutive androstane receptors (CAR) by ligand binding. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: A total of 21 selected antimalarials and 11 major metabolites were screened for binding to CAR isoforms using cellular and in vitro CAR-coactivator interaction assays, combined with in silico molecular docking. Identified ligands were further characterized by cell-based assays and primary human hepatocytes were used to elucidate induction of gene expression. KEY RESULTS: Only two artemisinin derivatives arteether and artemether, the metabolite deoxyartemisinin and artemisinin itself demonstrated agonist binding to the major isoforms CAR1 and CAR3, while arteether and artemether were also inverse agonists of CAR2. Dihydroartemisinin and artesunate acted as weak inverse agonists of CAR1. While arteether showed the highest activities in vitro, it was less active than artemisinin in inducing hepatic CYP3A4 gene expression in hepatocytes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Artemisinin derivatives and metabolites differentially affect the activities of CAR isoforms and of the pregnane X receptor (PXR). This negates a common effect of these drugs on CAR/PXR-dependent induction of drug metabolism and further provides an explanation for artemisinin consistently inducing cytochrome P450 genes in vivo, whereas arteether and artemether do not. All these drugs are metabolized very rapidly, but only artemisinin is converted to an enzyme-inducing metabolite. For better understanding of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction possibilities, the inducing properties of artemisinin metabolites should be considered.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Widespread resistance to antimalarial drugs requires combination therapies with increasing risk of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. Here, we explore the capacity of antimalarial drugs to induce drug metabolism via activation of constitutive androstane receptors (CAR) by ligand binding. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: A total of 21 selected antimalarials and 11 major metabolites were screened for binding to CAR isoforms using cellular and in vitro CAR-coactivator interaction assays, combined with in silico molecular docking. Identified ligands were further characterized by cell-based assays and primary human hepatocytes were used to elucidate induction of gene expression. KEY RESULTS: Only two artemisinin derivatives arteether and artemether, the metabolite deoxyartemisinin and artemisinin itself demonstrated agonist binding to the major isoforms CAR1 and CAR3, while arteether and artemether were also inverse agonists of CAR2. Dihydroartemisinin and artesunate acted as weak inverse agonists of CAR1. While arteether showed the highest activities in vitro, it was less active than artemisinin in inducing hepatic CYP3A4 gene expression in hepatocytes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Artemisinin derivatives and metabolites differentially affect the activities of CAR isoforms and of the pregnane X receptor (PXR). This negates a common effect of these drugs on CAR/PXR-dependent induction of drug metabolism and further provides an explanation for artemisinin consistently inducing cytochrome P450 genes in vivo, whereas arteether and artemether do not. All these drugs are metabolized very rapidly, but only artemisinin is converted to an enzyme-inducing metabolite. For better understanding of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction possibilities, the inducing properties of artemisinin metabolites should be considered.
Authors: Bryan A Ward; J Christopher Gorski; David R Jones; Stephen D Hall; David A Flockhart; Zeruesenay Desta Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2003-04-03 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: L B Moore; D J Parks; S A Jones; R K Bledsoe; T G Consler; J B Stimmel; B Goodwin; C Liddle; S G Blanchard; T M Willson; J L Collins; S A Kliewer Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-05-19 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Oliver Burk; Katja A Arnold; Andreas K Nussler; Elke Schaeffeler; Ekaterina Efimova; Bonnie A Avery; Mitchell A Avery; Martin F Fromm; Michel Eichelbaum Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Renzo Wolbold; Kathrin Klein; Oliver Burk; Andreas K Nüssler; Peter Neuhaus; Michel Eichelbaum; Matthias Schwab; Ulrich M Zanger Journal: Hepatology Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Johanna Jyrkkärinne; Björn Windshügel; Toni Rönkkö; Anu J Tervo; Jenni Küblbeck; Maija Lahtela-Kakkonen; Wolfgang Sippl; Antti Poso; Paavo Honkakoski Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2008-11-27 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Doaa A Elsherbiny; Sara A Asimus; Mats O Karlsson; Michael Ashton; Ulrika S H Simonsson Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2008-03-19 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Bryan Mackowiak; Linhao Li; Matthew A Welch; Daochuan Li; Jace W Jones; Scott Heyward; Maureen A Kane; Peter W Swaan; Hongbing Wang Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Rita Piedade; Stefanie Traub; Andreas Bitter; Andreas K Nüssler; José P Gil; Matthias Schwab; Oliver Burk Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Marianne Mathäs; Christian Nusshag; Christian Nuβhag; Oliver Burk; Ute Gödtel-Armbrust; Holger Herlyn; Leszek Wojnowski; Björn Windshügel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joseph A Badejo; Oyindamola O Abiodun; Olugbenga Akinola; Christian T Happi; Akintunde Sowunmi; Grace O Gbotosho Journal: Malar J Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Michaela Šadibolová; Tomáš Zárybnický; Tomáš Smutný; Petr Pávek; Zdeněk Šubrt; Petra Matoušková; Lenka Skálová; Iva Boušová Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-09-14 Impact factor: 5.923