| Literature DB >> 22577606 |
Abstract
Enalapril maleate, the oldest and most widely distributed ACEI, and alacepril, the newest and antioxidant ACEI, were compared in the point of cardioprotective effect for Dahl salt-sensitive rat. In order to evaluate the correlation between the three factors, cardiac fibrosis and blood pressure/oxidative-stress marker (tissue TBARS), index of correlation was calculated. The results showed a significant difference in cardiac fibrosis between high-dose alacepril (30 mg/kg/day, group H) and enalapril maleate (10 mg/kg/day, group E). There was significant correlation between cardiac fibrosis and oxidative-stress marker, although there was no correlation between cardiac fibrosis and blood pressure. Fibrosis was more influenced by oxidative stress not by blood pressure, we should not select ACEI only by blood pressure-lowering effect and should more consider cardioprotective effects of ACEI.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22577606 PMCID: PMC3329713 DOI: 10.1155/2012/105316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Med Int ISSN: 2042-0048
Figure 1The mean blood pressure (mmHg), plasma TBARS (nmol/mL), tissue TBARS (nmol/mg protein), and cardiac fibrosis in LV (%) after ACEI administration. Cardiac fibrosis in LV was decreased in Group H and increased in Group E, so that there was a significant difference between Group H and Group E.
Echocardiographic data in 19 weeks. Detailed data from the echocardiographic studies. No statistically significant difference was observed among the ACEI administration groups in IVSd, IVSs, LVPWd, and %FS.
| IVSs (mm) | LVIDs (mm) | LVPWs (mm) | IVSd (mm) | LVIDd (mm) | LVPWd (mm) | FS (%) | E/A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group P | 0.73 ± 0.07 | 0.48 ± 0.07 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 0.48 ± 0.07 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 33.6 ± 4.2 | 0.84 ± 0.13 |
| Group L | 0.76 ± 0.10 | 0.53 ± 0.05 | 0.27 ± 0.05 | 0.25 ± 0.05 | 0.53 ± 0.09 | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 29.6 ± 4.9 | 0.68 ± 0.07 |
| Group H | 0.83 ± 0.10 | 0.54 ± 0.05 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.54 ± 0.11 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 35.1 ± 7.1 | 0.83 ± 0.18 |
| Group E | 0.82 ± 0.04* | 0.55 ± 0.03 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.02* | 0.55 ± 0.09 | 0.22 ± 0.03* | 32.8 ± 8.4 | 0.66 ± 0.35 |
Mean ± SD, *means significant decrease compared with Group P.
Urine 8-OHdG, plasma, tissue TBARS, and fibrosis. The detailed data relating to urine 8-OHdG, plasma, and tissue TBARS and fibrosis. Cardiac fibrosis was lowest in Group H, and there were significant differences between Group E (P = 0.014).
| Plasma TBARS (nmol/mL) | Urine 8-OhdG (ng/mL) | Tissue TBARS (value per protein, nmol/mg protein) | Tissue TBARS (value per weight of tissue, nmol/g) | Cardiac fibrosis (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group P | 5.6 ± 2.5 | 5.3 ± 0.9 | 1.0 ± 0.6 | 61.5 ± 35.3 | 2.971 ± 0.7517 |
| Group L | 6.5 ± 4.0 | 5.6 ± 1.1 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 82.1 ± 30.5 | 3.065 ± 0.5602 |
| Group H | 7.2 ± 3.5 | 5.8 ± 1.2 | 0.8 ± 0.5 | 46.4 ± 30.2 | 2.744 ± 0.6649* |
| Group E | 6.6 ± 3.0 | 6.2 ± 2.2 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 80.9 ± 48.1 | 3.390 ± 0.5650 |
Mean ± SD, *means significant decrease compared with Group E.
Figure 2The coefficient of correlation between cardiac fibrosis and blood pressure (mmHg)/tissue TBARS (nmol/mg protein). Tissue TBARS in Groups H and E were significantly correlated with cardiac fibrosis in the left ventricle, whereas there was no significant correlation between cardiac fibrosis and blood pressure.