| Literature DB >> 22577245 |
Raynoo Thanan1, Mariko Murata, Ning Ma, Olfat Hammam, Mohamed Wishahi, Tarek El Leithy, Yusuke Hiraku, Shinji Oikawa, Shosuke Kawanishi.
Abstract
Inflammation may activate stem cells via prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production mediated by cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression. We performed an immunohistochemical analysis of the expression of stemness markers (Oct3/4 and CD44v6) and COX-2 in urinary bladder tissues obtained from cystitis and cancer patients with and without Schistosoma haematobium infections. Immunoreactivity to Oct3/4 was significantly higher in S. haematobium-associated cystitis and cancer tissues than in normal tissues. CD44v6 expression was significantly higher in bladder cancer without S. haematobium than in normal tissues. COX-2 was located in the cytoplasmic membrane, cytoplasm, and nucleus of the cancer cells. Interestingly, the nuclear localization of COX-2, which was reported to function as a transcription factor, was significantly associated with the upregulation of Oct3/4 and CD44v6 in bladder cancer tissues with and without S. haematobium infection, respectively. COX-2 activation may be involved in inflammation-mediated stem cell proliferation/differentiation in urinary bladder carcinogenesis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22577245 PMCID: PMC3337674 DOI: 10.1155/2012/165879
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mediators Inflamm ISSN: 0962-9351 Impact factor: 4.711
Pathological analysis of urinary bladder tumor tissues.
| Risk factor | Pathology diagnosis | Tumor grade | Case |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Transitional cell carcinoma | Well differentiated | 4 |
| Moderately differentiated | 11 | ||
| Poorly differentiated | 8 | ||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | Well differentiated | 2 | |
| Moderately differentiated | 5 | ||
| Poorly differentiated | 2 | ||
| Adenocarcinoma | Moderately differentiated | 1 | |
|
| |||
| No | Transitional cell carcinoma | Well differentiated | 8 |
| Moderately differentiated | 16 | ||
| Poorly differentiated | 13 | ||
| Squamous cell carcinoma | Moderately differentiated | 1 | |
| Adenocarcinoma | Moderately differentiated | 1 | |
| Poorly differentiated | 1 | ||
Figure 1Localization of COX-2 in urinary bladder cancer. COX-2 (red) was stained by an immunofluorescence method in urinary bladder tissues including normal (SH−) and cancer (SH+) tissues. (a) COX-2 was very weakly expressed in normal tissues. Scale bar is equal to 20 μm. (b) COX-2 staining was observed only in the cytoplasm of cancer cells. (c) COX-2 was strongly expressed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of cancer cells. Arrows indicate nuclear positive staining. (d) COX-2 was strongly expressed in the nucleus of cancer cells. SH: S. haematobium infection.
Figure 2Colocalization of Oct3/4 and COX-2 in urinary bladder samples. The distribution of Oct3/4 (green) and COX-2 (red) was determined by double immunofluorescence in urinary bladder tissues from normal, S. haematobium-associated cystitis and cancer subjects. Original magnification is 200x. Enlarged: enlargement of dotted areas. SH: S. haematobium infection.
Figure 3Localization of CD44v6 and COX-2 in urinary bladder samples. The distribution of CD44v6 (green) and COX-2 (red) was determined by double immunofluorescence in normal tissue, hyperplasic tissue nearby tumor, and cancer of urinary bladder tissue. These subjects had other risk factors without S. haematobium infections. Original magnification is 200x. Enlarged: enlargement of dotted areas. SH: S. haematobium infection.
Expression of Oct3/4 and CD44v6 in urinary bladder cancer patients positive and negative for COX-2 expression.
| Risk factor | Stemness marker | #IHC grading | COX-2 expression | Nuclear localization of COX-2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative case | Positive case | Negative case | Positive case | |||
|
| Oct3/4 | − | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0 |
| + | 8 | 9 | 10 | 7 | ||
| ++ | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | ||
| +++ | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | ||
| * |
|
| ||||
| CD44v6 | − | 9 | 10 | 10 | 9 | |
| + | 2 | 7 | 5 | 4 | ||
| ++ | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||
| +++ | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| ||||||
| No | Oct3/4 | − | 3 | 27 | 4 | 26 |
| + | 1 | 9 | 2 | 8 | ||
| ++ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| +++ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
|
|
| ||||
| CD44v6 | − | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| + | 2 | 9 | 3 | 8 | ||
| ++ | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | ||
| +++ | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | ||
|
|
|
| ||||
#IHC grade was assigned to each specimen according to the degree of staining as described in Materials and Methods.
SH: S. haematobium infection.
*P values were calculated by Chi-square test.
(a) COX-2
| $COX-2 staining | − |
| * |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal (SH−) | 26 | 5 | |
| Cancer (SH−) | 4 | 36 | <0.001a |
| Cystitis (SH+) | 5 | 7 | 0.006a |
| Cancer (SH+) | 13 | 20 | <0.001a |
(b) Oct3/4
| #IHC grading | − |
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal (SH−) | 19 | 11 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Cancer (SH−) | 30 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0.299a | |
| Cystitis (SH+) | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0.031a | |
| Cancer (SH+) | 8 | 17 | 2 | 6 | 0.010a | <0.001b |
(c) CD44v6
| IHC grading | − |
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal (SH−) | 14 | 14 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Cancer (SH−) | 3 | 11 | 15 | 11 | <0.001a | |
| Cystitis (SH+) | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0.496a | |
| Cancer (SH+) | 19 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0.484a | <0.001b |
$COX-2 staining results were assigned as (−) negative and (+) positive staining.
#IHC grade was assigned to each specimen according to the degree of staining as described in Materials and Methods.
SH: S. haematobium infection.
*P values were calculated by Chi-square test. aVersus normal (SH−). bVersus cancer (SH−).