Literature DB >> 22576828

Detection of progressive macular thickness loss using optical coherence tomography in glaucoma suspect and glaucomatous eyes.

P I Niles1, D S Greenfield, M Sehi, N Bhardwaj, S M Iverson, Y S Chung.   

Abstract

AIMS: To examine the rate of macular thickness loss using time-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) in functionally progressing versus non-progressing eyes, determined by standard automated perimetry (SAP).
METHODS: Glaucoma suspects (GS) and glaucomatous (G) eyes underwent SAP and OCT imaging every 6 months. Functional progression was determined using pointwise linear regression, defined as 2 contiguous locations losing ≥1.0 dB/year at P<1.0% in the same hemifield. The annual rate of macular thickness loss was calculated from inner and outer regions of the macular map.
RESULTS: 72 eyes (43 GS and 29G) with ≥30 months of follow-up were enrolled. Fourteen eyes demonstrated SAP progression. The annual rate of macular thickness loss (μm/year) in progressing eyes was faster (all P<0.05) than non-progressing eyes in temporal outer (-1.90±2.97 vs 0.33±2.77), nasal inner (-1.70±2.66 vs 0.14±2.76), superior inner (-2.15±4.57 vs 0.51±2.99), temporal inner quadrants (-2.58±5.05 vs -0.38±2.34), and the average of inner macular quadrants (-1.84±2.90 vs 0.03±2.10). The rate of loss in the nasal inner (P=0.02) and temporal outer (P=0.02) macular regions was associated with optic disc haemorrhage.
CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with SAP progression have significantly greater rates of macular thickness loss consistent with glaucomatous retinal ganglion cell atrophy, as compared with non-progressing eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22576828      PMCID: PMC3396176          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  43 in total

1.  Comparison of glaucoma diagnostic Capabilities of Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Seong Bae Park; Kyung Rim Sung; Sung Yong Kang; Kyung Ri Kim; Michael S Kook
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-12

2.  The region of largest β-zone parapapillary atrophy area predicts the location of most rapid visual field progression.

Authors:  Christopher C Teng; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Tiago S Prata; Craig A Liebmann; Celso Tello; Robert Ritch; Jeffrey M Liebmann
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Detection of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer thickness loss with optical coherence tomography using 4 criteria for functional progression.

Authors:  Dilraj S Grewal; Mitra Sehi; James D Paauw; David S Greenfield
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2012 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Risk factors for visual field progression in treated glaucoma.

Authors:  Carlos Gustavo V De Moraes; Viral J Juthani; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher C Teng; Celso Tello; Remo Susanna; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05

5.  Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma a prospective analysis with neuroretinal rim and visual field progression.

Authors:  Christopher Kai Shun Leung; Shu Liu; Robert N Weinreb; Gilda Lai; Cong Ye; Carol Yim Lui Cheung; Chi Pui Pang; Kwok Kay Tse; Dennis Shun Chiu Lam
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a comparison between spectral-domain and time-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Christopher Kai-Shun Leung; Vivian Chiu; Robert N Weinreb; Shu Liu; Cong Ye; Marco Yu; Carol Yim-Lui Cheung; Gilda Lai; Dennis Shun-Chiu Lam
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Comparison of quantitative imaging devices and subjective optic nerve head assessment by general ophthalmologists to differentiate normal from glaucomatous eyes.

Authors:  Roberto M Vessani; Rodrigo Moritz; Lúcia Batis; Roberta Benetti Zagui; Silvia Bernardoni; Remo Susanna
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Detection of glaucoma progression with stratus OCT retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements.

Authors:  Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Luciana M Alencar; Christopher Bowd; Pamela A Sample; Remo Susanna; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a study on optical coherence tomography guided progression analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Kai-shun Leung; Carol Yim Lui Cheung; Robert N Weinreb; Kunliang Qiu; Shu Liu; Haitao Li; Guihua Xu; Ning Fan; Chi Pui Pang; Kwok Kay Tse; Dennis Shun Chiu Lam
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Detection of macular ganglion cell loss in glaucoma by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Ou Tan; Vikas Chopra; Ake Tzu-Hui Lu; Joel S Schuman; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Gadi Wollstein; Rohit Varma; David Huang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  3 in total

1.  Thirteen-Year Follow-up of Optic Disc Hemorrhages in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Authors:  Donald L Budenz; Julia Beiser Huecker; Steven J Gedde; Mae Gordon; Michael Kass
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  The impact of disc hemorrhage studies on our understanding of glaucoma: a systematic review 50 years after the rediscovery of disc hemorrhage.

Authors:  Tetsuya Yamamoto
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Usefulness of axonal tract-dependent OCT macular sectors for evaluating structural change in normal-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  Kazuko Omodaka; Tsutomu Kikawa; Yukihiro Shiga; Satoru Tsuda; Yu Yokoyama; Haruka Sato; Junko Ohuchi; Akiko Matsumoto; Hidetoshi Takahashi; Masahiro Akiba; Toru Nakazawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.