Literature DB >> 22576696

When to perform bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: external validation of a novel risk stratification tool.

Cosimo De Nunzio1, Costantino Leonardo, Giorgio Franco, Francesco Esperto, Aldo Brassetti, Giovanni Simonelli, Dino Dente, Carlo De Dominicis, Andrea Tubaro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To externally validate the performance characteristics of the Briganti's risk stratification tool for baseline staging bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa).
METHODS: From 2009 onwards, a consecutive series of patients with PCa were enrolled. All patients were staged to evaluate the presence of bone metastasis (BM) with a conventional total-body Tc 99 m MDP scintigraphy performed regardless of baseline PCa characteristics. The area under the curve (AUC) estimates were used to test the accuracy of the Briganti's risk stratification tool that recommended staging baseline bone scan for patients with a biopsy Gleason score >7 or with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >10 ng/ml and palpable disease (cT2/T3). The new tool was compared to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guideline.
RESULTS: A total of 313 patients were consecutively enrolled. Median age was 68 (range 49-95 years), and median PSA was 7 ng/ml (range 0.81-2,670). Twenty (6.4 %) patients presented BMs. Patients with BMs were significantly older, with higher PSA and a higher Gleason score (p = 0.001). The novel Briganti's model was significantly (p = 0.001) more accurate (AUC: 0.75; CI: 0.632-0.859) than the EAU guideline (AUC: 0.64; CI: 0.52-0.761) for the prediction of BMs.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study validated in a group of patients with PCa the novel risk stratification tool proposed by Briganti, which presented a higher accuracy for baseline staging bone scan when compared with the EAU guideline. In our experience, this approach would further reduce (about 60 %) the use of staging baseline bone scan without compromising the ability to detect BMs in patients with PCa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22576696     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-012-0880-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  16 in total

1.  Guideline for the management of clinically localized prostate cancer: 2007 update.

Authors:  Ian Thompson; James Brantley Thrasher; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Michael S Cookson; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine M Tangen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Variations in use of imaging in a national sample of men with early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Chris L Pashos; James M Henning; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  The value of a baseline bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

Authors:  K Lin; Z Szabo; B B Chin; A C Civelek
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.794

Review 4.  The natural history, skeletal complications, and management of bone metastases in patients with prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  B I Carlin; G L Andriole
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Prognostic factors in metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Orhan Yigitbasi; Ufuk Ozturk; H N Goksel Goktug; Adnan Gucuk; Hasan Bakirtas
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 6.  Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; Peter L Choyke; Steven C Eberhardt; Steven A Leibel; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Predicting bone scan findings using sPSA in patients newly diagnosed of prostate cancer: feasibility in Asian population.

Authors:  Miranda H Y Lai; Wing Hang Luk; James C S Chan
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2009-09-06       Impact factor: 3.498

8.  When to perform bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer: external validation of the currently available guidelines and proposal of a novel risk stratification tool.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Niccolò Passoni; Matteo Ferrari; Umberto Capitanio; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Gallina; Luigi Filippo Da Pozzo; Maria Picchio; Valerio Di Girolamo; Andrea Salonia; Liugi Gianolli; Cristina Messa; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Is it suitable to eliminate bone scan for prostate cancer patients with PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL?

Authors:  Seung Hwan Lee; Mun Su Chung; Kyung Kgi Park; Chan Dong Yom; Dae Hoon Lee; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Modern Detection of Prostate Cancer's Bone Metastasis: Is the Bone Scan Era Over?

Authors:  Bertrand Tombal; Frederic Lecouvet
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-10-16
View more
  3 in total

1.  Predicting bone scan positivity after biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in both hormone-naive men and patients receiving androgen-deprivation therapy: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  D M Moreira; M R Cooperberg; L E Howard; W J Aronson; C J Kane; M K Terris; C L Amling; M Kuchibhatla; S J Freedland
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  Application of bone scans for prostate cancer staging: Which guideline shows better result?

Authors:  Ari Chong; Insang Hwang; Jung-Min Ha; Seong Hyeon Yu; Eu Chang Hwang; Ho Song Yu; Sun Ouck Kim; Seung-Il Jung; Taek Won Kang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  When to perform positron emission tomography/computed tomography or radionuclide bone scan in patients with recently diagnosed prostate cancer.

Authors:  Carmelo Caldarella; Giorgio Treglia; Alessandro Giordano; Luca Giovanella
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.989

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.