Literature DB >> 22576311

Intensive chemotherapy for elderly patients with acute myelogeneous leukemia: a propensity score analysis by the Japan Hematology and Oncology Clinical Study Group (J-HOCS).

Kumi Oshima1, Wataru Takahashi, Yuki Asano-Mori, Koji Izutsu, Tsuyoshi Takahashi, Yukihiro Arai, Yasunori Nakagawa, Kensuke Usuki, Mineo Kurokawa, Kenshi Suzuki, Kinuko Mitani, Yoshinobu Kanda.   

Abstract

The prognosis of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in the elderly patients is extremely poor. Although several previous studies have suggested that intensive chemotherapy is associated with a better prognosis, there may have been a selection bias. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the impact of intensive chemotherapy for AML in the elderly by stratifying patients according to a propensity score. Eighty-one AML patients aged 70 years or more were included in this study. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia were not included. A propensity score for the use of intensive chemotherapy was calculated from four factors at diagnosis. Forty-five patients received intensive chemotherapy, whereas 36 received low-dose or no chemotherapy. We stratified the patients into quartiles based on the propensity score. The numbers of patients in the first, second, third, and forth quartiles who received intensive chemotherapy were 5 of 21, 10 of 20, 12 of 20, and 18 of 20, respectively. A stratified log-rank test showed significantly better overall survival in the intensive chemotherapy group (P = 0.0088). Especially, in the combined second and third quartiles, which showed an equal tendency for intensive and non-intensive strategies; overall survival at 3 years was 37.5 % for the intensive chemotherapy group and 13.0 % for the non-intensive chemotherapy group (P = 0.0022). A conventional multivariate analysis confirmed that intensive chemotherapy was beneficial (hazard ratio 0.50, 95 % confidence interval 0.27-0.93, P = 0.028). In conclusion, intensive chemotherapy may prolong overall survival in elderly AML patients who are considered to be able to tolerate such treatment based on factors at diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22576311     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-012-1487-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  5 in total

1.  Benchmarking treatment effects for patients over 70 with acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tea Reljic; Marina Sehovic; Jeffrey Lancet; Jongphil Kim; Najla Al Ali; Benjamin Djulbegovic; Martine Extermann
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 2.  Acute myeloid leukemia in older adults.

Authors:  Masamitsu Yanada; Tomoki Naoe
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Estimating the treatment effect from non-randomized studies: The example of reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation in hematological diseases.

Authors:  Matthieu Resche-Rigon; Romain Pirracchio; Marie Robin; Regis Peffault De Latour; David Sibon; Lionel Ades; Patricia Ribaud; Jean-Paul Fermand; Catherine Thieblemont; Gérard Socié; Sylvie Chevret
Journal:  BMC Blood Disord       Date:  2012-08-16

Review 4.  Profile of sapacitabine: potential for the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in elderly patients.

Authors:  Ming Y Lim; Katarzyna Jamieson
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  How old is old: the beginning of a new era for therapeutic challenges for elderly patients with AML.

Authors:  Hee-Je Kim
Journal:  Blood Res       Date:  2014-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.