PURPOSE: There is compelling evidence that interference of various anesthetics with synaptic functions and stress-provoking procedures during critical periods of brain maturation results in increased neuroapoptotic cell death. The hypothesis is that adverse intrauterine environmental conditions leading to intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) with altered brain development may result in enhanced susceptibility to developmental anesthetic neurotoxicity. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, blinded animal study performed in a university laboratory involving 20 normal-weight (NW) and 19 IUGR newborn piglets. General inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane and nitrous oxide at clinically comparable dosages were administered for about 10 h. Surgical and monitoring procedures were accompanied by appropriate stage of general anesthesia. Resulting effects on developmental anesthetic and stress-induced neurotoxicity were assessed by estimation of apoptotic rates in untreated piglets and piglets after 10-h general anesthesia with MAC 1.0 isoflurane in 70 % nitrous oxide and 30 % oxygen. RESULTS: IUGR piglets exposed to different levels of isoflurane inhalation exhibited a significant increased apoptosis rate (TUNEL-positive neuronal cells) compared to NW animals of similar condition (P < 0.05). Cardiovascular and metabolic monitorings revealed similar effects of general anesthesia together with similar effects on brain electrical activity and broadly a similar dose-dependent gradual restriction in brain oxidative metabolism in NW and IUGR piglets. CONCLUSIONS: There is no indication that the increased rate in neuroapoptosis in IUGR piglets is confounded by additional adverse systemic or organ-specific impairments resulting from administered mixed inhalation anesthesia. Developmental anesthetic and stress-induced neuroapoptosis presumably originated in response to fetal adaptations to adverse conditions during prenatal life and should be considered in clinical interventions on infants having suffered from fetal growth restriction.
PURPOSE: There is compelling evidence that interference of various anesthetics with synaptic functions and stress-provoking procedures during critical periods of brain maturation results in increased neuroapoptotic cell death. The hypothesis is that adverse intrauterine environmental conditions leading to intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) with altered brain development may result in enhanced susceptibility to developmental anesthetic neurotoxicity. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, blinded animal study performed in a university laboratory involving 20 normal-weight (NW) and 19 IUGR newborn piglets. General inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane and nitrous oxide at clinically comparable dosages were administered for about 10 h. Surgical and monitoring procedures were accompanied by appropriate stage of general anesthesia. Resulting effects on developmental anesthetic and stress-induced neurotoxicity were assessed by estimation of apoptotic rates in untreated piglets and piglets after 10-h general anesthesia with MAC 1.0 isoflurane in 70 % nitrous oxide and 30 % oxygen. RESULTS: IUGR piglets exposed to different levels of isoflurane inhalation exhibited a significant increased apoptosis rate (TUNEL-positive neuronal cells) compared to NW animals of similar condition (P < 0.05). Cardiovascular and metabolic monitorings revealed similar effects of general anesthesia together with similar effects on brain electrical activity and broadly a similar dose-dependent gradual restriction in brain oxidative metabolism in NW and IUGR piglets. CONCLUSIONS: There is no indication that the increased rate in neuroapoptosis in IUGR piglets is confounded by additional adverse systemic or organ-specific impairments resulting from administered mixed inhalation anesthesia. Developmental anesthetic and stress-induced neuroapoptosis presumably originated in response to fetal adaptations to adverse conditions during prenatal life and should be considered in clinical interventions on infants having suffered from fetal growth restriction.
Authors: Kyle L Fulghum; Juliette B Smith; Julia Chariker; Lauren F Garrett; Kenneth R Brittian; Pawel K Lorkiewicz; Lindsey A McNally; Shizuka Uchida; Steven P Jones; Bradford G Hill; Helen E Collins Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 5.125
Authors: Kevin D Broad; Jane Hassell; Bobbi Fleiss; Go Kawano; Mojgan Ezzati; Eridan Rocha-Ferreira; Mariya Hristova; Kate Bennett; Igor Fierens; Ryan Burnett; Badr Chaban; Daniel Alonso-Alconada; Aaron Oliver-Taylor; Ilias Tachsidis; Jamshid Rostami; Pierre Gressens; Robert D Sanders; Nicola J Robertson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Miriam Ayuso; Laura Buyssens; Marina Stroe; Allan Valenzuela; Karel Allegaert; Anne Smits; Pieter Annaert; Antonius Mulder; Sebastien Carpentier; Chris Van Ginneken; Steven Van Cruchten Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 6.321