BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases reduce the availability of iron for effective erythropoiesis. This review summarises clinical consequences of iron deficiency (ID) and anaemia in cancer patients, mechanisms how impaired iron homeostasis affects diagnosis and treatment of ID, and data from clinical trials evaluating i.v. iron with or without concomitant erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). DESIGN: Clinical trial reports were identified in PubMed and abstracts at relevant major congresses. RESULTS: Reported prevalence of ID in cancer patients ranges from 32 to 60% and most iron-deficient patients are also anaemic. Randomised clinical trials have shown superior efficacy of i.v. iron over oral or no iron in reducing blood transfusions, increasing haemoglobin, and improving quality of life in ESA-treated anaemic cancer patients. Furthermore, i.v. iron without additional ESA should be evaluated as potential treatment in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia. At recommended doses, i.v. iron is well tolerated, particularly compared with oral iron. No serious drug-related adverse effects were seen during long-term use in renal disease and no effect on tumour growth has been observed in trials with anaemic cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable diagnosis and treatment of ID are recommended key steps in modern cancer patient management to minimise impact on quality of life and performance status.
BACKGROUND:Chronic diseases reduce the availability of iron for effective erythropoiesis. This review summarises clinical consequences of iron deficiency (ID) and anaemia in cancerpatients, mechanisms how impaired iron homeostasis affects diagnosis and treatment of ID, and data from clinical trials evaluating i.v. iron with or without concomitant erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). DESIGN: Clinical trial reports were identified in PubMed and abstracts at relevant major congresses. RESULTS: Reported prevalence of ID in cancerpatients ranges from 32 to 60% and most iron-deficientpatients are also anaemic. Randomised clinical trials have shown superior efficacy of i.v. iron over oral or no iron in reducing blood transfusions, increasing haemoglobin, and improving quality of life in ESA-treated anaemic cancerpatients. Furthermore, i.v. iron without additional ESA should be evaluated as potential treatment in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia. At recommended doses, i.v. iron is well tolerated, particularly compared with oral iron. No serious drug-related adverse effects were seen during long-term use in renal disease and no effect on tumour growth has been observed in trials with anaemic cancerpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable diagnosis and treatment of ID are recommended key steps in modern cancerpatient management to minimise impact on quality of life and performance status.
Authors: J Coussirou; A Debourdeau; A Stancu; C Jean; W Azouza; B Chanet; F De Crozals; R Boustany; P Debourdeau Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Fabian Finkelmeier; Dominik Bettinger; Verena Köberle; Michael Schultheiß; Stefan Zeuzem; Bernd Kronenberger; Albrecht Piiper; Oliver Waidmann Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Thomas Thomaidis; Arndt Weinmann; Martin Sprinzl; Stephan Kanzler; Jochen Raedle; Matthias Ebert; Carl Cristoph Schimanski; Peter Robert Galle; Thomas Hoehler; Markus Moehler Journal: Int J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 3.402