INTRODUCTION: Anesthesiologists face a dilemma in determining appropriate dosing of anesthetic drugs in obese children. In this study we determined the dose of propofol that caused loss of consciousness in 95% (ED(95)) of obese and nonobese children as determined by loss of eye lash reflex. METHODS:Forty obese (body mass index [BMI] > 95th percentile for age and gender) and 40 normal weight (BMI 25th to 84th percentile) healthy ASA 1 to 2 children ages 3 to 17 years presenting for surgical procedures were studied using a biased coin design. The primary endpoint was loss of lash reflex at 20 seconds after propofol administration. The first patient in each group received 1.0 mg/kg of IV propofol, and subsequent patients received predetermined propofol doses based on the lash reflex response in the previous patient. If the lash reflex was present, the next patient received a dose increment of 0.25 mg/kg. If the lash reflex was absent, the next patient was randomized to receive either the same dose (95% probability) or a dose decrement of 0.25 mg/kg (5% probability). The ED(95) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using isotonic regression and bootstrapping methods respectively. RESULTS: The ED(95) of propofol for loss of lash reflex was significantly lower in obese pediatric patients (2.0 mg/kg, approximate 95% CI, 1.8 to 2.2 mg/kg) in comparison with nonobese patients (3.2 mg/kg, approximate 95% CI, 2.7 to 3.2 mg/kg), P ≤ 0.05. DISCUSSION: A simple approach to deciding what dose of propofol should be used for induction of anesthesia in children ages 3 to 17 years is to first establish the child's BMI on readily available gender-specific charts. Obese children (BMI >95th percentile for age and gender) require a lower weight-based dose of propofol for induction of anesthesia, than do normal-weight children.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Anesthesiologists face a dilemma in determining appropriate dosing of anesthetic drugs in obesechildren. In this study we determined the dose of propofol that caused loss of consciousness in 95% (ED(95)) of obese and nonobese children as determined by loss of eye lash reflex. METHODS: Forty obese (body mass index [BMI] > 95th percentile for age and gender) and 40 normal weight (BMI 25th to 84th percentile) healthy ASA 1 to 2 children ages 3 to 17 years presenting for surgical procedures were studied using a biased coin design. The primary endpoint was loss of lash reflex at 20 seconds after propofol administration. The first patient in each group received 1.0 mg/kg of IV propofol, and subsequent patients received predetermined propofol doses based on the lash reflex response in the previous patient. If the lash reflex was present, the next patient received a dose increment of 0.25 mg/kg. If the lash reflex was absent, the next patient was randomized to receive either the same dose (95% probability) or a dose decrement of 0.25 mg/kg (5% probability). The ED(95) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using isotonic regression and bootstrapping methods respectively. RESULTS: The ED(95) of propofol for loss of lash reflex was significantly lower in obese pediatricpatients (2.0 mg/kg, approximate 95% CI, 1.8 to 2.2 mg/kg) in comparison with nonobese patients (3.2 mg/kg, approximate 95% CI, 2.7 to 3.2 mg/kg), P ≤ 0.05. DISCUSSION: A simple approach to deciding what dose of propofol should be used for induction of anesthesia in children ages 3 to 17 years is to first establish the child's BMI on readily available gender-specific charts. Obesechildren (BMI >95th percentile for age and gender) require a lower weight-based dose of propofol for induction of anesthesia, than do normal-weight children.
Authors: Kathryn E Kyler; Jonathan Wagner; Chelsea Hosey-Cojocari; Kevin Watt; Valentina Shakhnovich Journal: Paediatr Drugs Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 3.022
Authors: J Diepstraten; V Chidambaran; S Sadhasivam; H J Blussé van Oud-Alblas; T Inge; B van Ramshorst; E P A van Dongen; A A Vinks; C A J Knibbe Journal: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Date: 2013-09-11
Authors: Sung Min Yang; Dae Yong Yi; Geun Joo Choi; In Seok Lim; Soo Ahn Chae; Sin Weon Yun; Na Mi Lee; Su Yeong Kim; Eung Sang Choi Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 2.153