Literature DB >> 22575288

Measurement of lumbar spine range of movement and coupled motion using inertial sensors - a protocol validity study.

Tshui-Hung Ha1, Kambiz Saber-Sheikh, Ann P Moore, Mark P Jones.   

Abstract

Measurement of spinal lumbar range of movement is useful in clinical examination of the spine and for monitoring changes in spinal movement characteristics of individuals over time, particularly in the research context. As the spine exhibits six degrees of movement, three dimensional measurements provide additional information that could benefit the study of spinal conditions. Inertial measurement systems present an innovative method of spinal motion measurement. These systems are small and portable, and of low cost compared to laboratory based three dimensional measurement systems such as electromagnetic and opto-electronic systems. The present study aimed to validate the use of inertial measurement systems in three dimensional spinal range of movement measurement using an electromagnetic tracking system as a reference. Twenty-six healthy participants had their lumbar spine range of movement measured using both an inertial measurement system and an electromagnetic tracking system. Measurements taken by the inertial measurement system were found to be highly correlated with the electromagnetic tracking system (overall regression R(2) 0.999, p < 0.005). Measurements showed strong agreement (mean differences between -0.81° and 1.26°) and produced no significant difference from the electromagnetic tracking system (paired t-test p > 0.05). The ranges of movement measured were also highly comparable to those reported in the literature. Inertial measurement systems that consist of triaxial gyroscopes, accelerometers and magnetometers are concluded to be valid tools for three dimensional spinal range of movement measurement within or outside of the laboratory settings due to their cost, size and portability.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22575288     DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2012.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  15 in total

1.  Quadrupedal Locomotion-Respiration Entrainment and Metabolic Economy in Cross-Country Skiers.

Authors:  Kevin Boldt; Anthony Killick; Walter Herzog
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 1.833

2.  Individual characteristics of reliable lumbar coupling motions.

Authors:  Woo-Suck Yun; Hyunho Kim; Ji Hoon Ahn; Young-Bae Park; Young-Jae Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Validation of Inertial Measurement Units for Upper Body Kinematics.

Authors:  Melissa M B Morrow; Bethany Lowndes; Emma Fortune; Kenton R Kaufman; M Susan Hallbeck
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 1.833

4.  A technical support tool for joint range of motion determination in functional diagnostics - an inter-rater study.

Authors:  Christoph Schiefer; Thomas Kraus; Rolf P Ellegast; Elke Ochsmann
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.646

5.  Clinically acceptable agreement between the ViMove wireless motion sensor system and the Vicon motion capture system when measuring lumbar region inclination motion in the sagittal and coronal planes.

Authors:  Hanne Leirbekk Mjøsund; Eleanor Boyle; Per Kjaer; Rune Mygind Mieritz; Tue Skallgård; Peter Kent
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Validity and reliability of innovative field measurements of tibial accelerations and spinal kinematics during cricket fast bowling.

Authors:  Billy Senington; Raymond Y Lee; Jonathan Mark Williams
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 7.  Comparing lumbo-pelvic kinematics in people with and without back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert A Laird; Jayce Gilbert; Peter Kent; Jennifer L Keating
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  An experimental study investigating the effect of pain relief from oral analgesia on lumbar range of motion, velocity, acceleration and movement irregularity.

Authors:  Jonathan M Williams; Inam Haq; Raymond Y Lee
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  How consistent are lordosis, range of movement and lumbo-pelvic rhythm in people with and without back pain?

Authors:  Robert A Laird; Peter Kent; Jennifer L Keating
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Wearable technology for spine movement assessment: A systematic review.

Authors:  Enrica Papi; Woon Senn Koh; Alison H McGregor
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.