Lisa A Kidd1. 1. Research Fellow in Public Health, Institute for Applied Health Research, School of Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about peoples' self-management experiences and their desires or expectations to engage in self-management. As such, there is little understanding about individuals' perceived cues and barriers to engagement in self-management, particularly in people affected by cancer. OBJECTIVE: To understand cues and barriers to people's engagement in self-management during chemotherapy treatment for colorectal cancer. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of qualitative data from mixed methods, longitudinal study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eleven participants undergoing treatment for colorectal cancer. Semi-structured interviews were conducted twice with each participant, at the start and end of a 6-month course of chemotherapy treatment in a Scottish cancer centre. RESULTS: Cues and barriers to engagement in self-management appeared to stem from perceptions of the impact and associated severity of side effects experiences as well as the perceptions about the efficacy of chosen self-management activities and perceptions of control in minimizing the consequences of cancer treatment. Severe, episodic or unexpected side effects coupled with perceptions of uncertainty, lack of control and lack of adequate preparation to engage in self-management were identified as key barriers to engagement. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Participants' reflection on, or appraisal of, their treatment-related experiences and personal abilities, confidence and preferences to manage the impact of these shaped their subsequent engagement in self-management. The findings highlight the importance of understanding individual's self-management experiences, perceptions, preferences, priorities and needs to help support, prepare and enable them to feel capable and confident to engage actively and effectively in self-management.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about peoples' self-management experiences and their desires or expectations to engage in self-management. As such, there is little understanding about individuals' perceived cues and barriers to engagement in self-management, particularly in people affected by cancer. OBJECTIVE: To understand cues and barriers to people's engagement in self-management during chemotherapy treatment for colorectal cancer. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of qualitative data from mixed methods, longitudinal study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eleven participants undergoing treatment for colorectal cancer. Semi-structured interviews were conducted twice with each participant, at the start and end of a 6-month course of chemotherapy treatment in a Scottish cancer centre. RESULTS: Cues and barriers to engagement in self-management appeared to stem from perceptions of the impact and associated severity of side effects experiences as well as the perceptions about the efficacy of chosen self-management activities and perceptions of control in minimizing the consequences of cancer treatment. Severe, episodic or unexpected side effects coupled with perceptions of uncertainty, lack of control and lack of adequate preparation to engage in self-management were identified as key barriers to engagement. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION:Participants' reflection on, or appraisal of, their treatment-related experiences and personal abilities, confidence and preferences to manage the impact of these shaped their subsequent engagement in self-management. The findings highlight the importance of understanding individual's self-management experiences, perceptions, preferences, priorities and needs to help support, prepare and enable them to feel capable and confident to engage actively and effectively in self-management.
Authors: David Reeves; Anne Kennedy; Catherine Fullwood; Peter Bower; Caroline Gardner; Claire Gately; Victoria Lee; Gerry Richardson; Anne Rogers Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Elizabeth A Bayliss; John F Steiner; Douglas H Fernald; Lori A Crane; Deborah S Main Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Teresa M Salgado; Emily Mackler; Jane A Severson; Jamie Lindsay; Peter Batra; Laura Petersen; Karen B Farris Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-01-20 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Paul Galdas; Zoe Darwin; Lisa Kidd; Christian Blickem; Kerri McPherson; Kate Hunt; Peter Bower; Simon Gilbody; Gerry Richardson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Dominik Ose; Eva C Winkler; Sarah Berger; Ines Baudendistel; Martina Kamradt; Felicitas Eckrich; Joachim Szecsenyi Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 2.711