Literature DB >> 22574759

Consequences, control and appraisal: cues and barriers to engaging in self-management among people affected by colorectal cancer - a secondary analysis of qualitative data.

Lisa A Kidd1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about peoples' self-management experiences and their desires or expectations to engage in self-management. As such, there is little understanding about individuals' perceived cues and barriers to engagement in self-management, particularly in people affected by cancer.
OBJECTIVE: To understand cues and barriers to people's engagement in self-management during chemotherapy treatment for colorectal cancer.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of qualitative data from mixed methods, longitudinal study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Eleven participants undergoing treatment for colorectal cancer. Semi-structured interviews were conducted twice with each participant, at the start and end of a 6-month course of chemotherapy treatment in a Scottish cancer centre.
RESULTS: Cues and barriers to engagement in self-management appeared to stem from perceptions of the impact and associated severity of side effects experiences as well as the perceptions about the efficacy of chosen self-management activities and perceptions of control in minimizing the consequences of cancer treatment. Severe, episodic or unexpected side effects coupled with perceptions of uncertainty, lack of control and lack of adequate preparation to engage in self-management were identified as key barriers to engagement. DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: Participants' reflection on, or appraisal of, their treatment-related experiences and personal abilities, confidence and preferences to manage the impact of these shaped their subsequent engagement in self-management. The findings highlight the importance of understanding individual's self-management experiences, perceptions, preferences, priorities and needs to help support, prepare and enable them to feel capable and confident to engage actively and effectively in self-management.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer; engagement; patient-centered care; secondary qualitative analysis; self-management

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22574759      PMCID: PMC5060740          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00785.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  22 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness of interventions to support self-care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gerry Richardson; Hugh Gravelle; Helen Weatherly; Gill Ritchie
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Issues encountered in a qualitative secondary analysis of help-seeking in the prodrome to psychosis.

Authors:  Brenda M Gladstone; Tiziana Volpe; Katherine M Boydell
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 1.505

Review 3.  Towards a personalised approach to aftercare: a review of cancer follow-up in the UK.

Authors:  Nicola J Davies; Lynn Batehup
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Symptom distress and self-care strategies of colorectal cancer patients with diarrhea up to 3 months after surgery.

Authors:  Li-Hui Pan; Yun-Fang Tsai; Mei-Ling Chen; Reiping Tang; Chee-Jen Chang
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

5.  Understanding the self-care strategies of patients with asthma.

Authors:  Christine Loignon; Christophe Bedos; Robert Sévigny; Nicole Leduc
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-11-28

Review 6.  UK self-care support initiatives for older patients with long-term conditions: a review.

Authors:  K Berzins; S Reilly; J Abell; J Hughes; D Challis
Journal:  Chronic Illn       Date:  2009-03

7.  Experiences of self-care in patients with colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Lisa Kidd; Nora Kearney; Ronan O'Carroll; Gill Hubbard
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 3.187

8.  Perceived control and involvement in self care in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lisa Kidd; Gill Hubbard; Ronan O'Carroll; Nora Kearney
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.036

9.  Predicting who will benefit from an Expert Patients Programme self-management course.

Authors:  David Reeves; Anne Kennedy; Catherine Fullwood; Peter Bower; Caroline Gardner; Claire Gately; Victoria Lee; Gerry Richardson; Anne Rogers
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Descriptions of barriers to self-care by persons with comorbid chronic diseases.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Bayliss; John F Steiner; Douglas H Fernald; Lori A Crane; Deborah S Main
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

View more
  4 in total

1.  The relationship between patient activation, confidence to self-manage side effects, and adherence to oral oncolytics: a pilot study with Michigan oncology practices.

Authors:  Teresa M Salgado; Emily Mackler; Jane A Severson; Jamie Lindsay; Peter Batra; Laura Petersen; Karen B Farris
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Is self-management feasible and acceptable for addressing nutrition and physical activity needs of cancer survivors?

Authors:  Sharon Lawn; Stephanie Zrim; Stephanie Leggett; Michelle Miller; Richard Woodman; Lynnette Jones; Ganessan Kichenadasse; Shawgi Sukumaran; Chris Karapetis; Bogda Koczwara
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  The accessibility and acceptability of self-management support interventions for men with long term conditions: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Paul Galdas; Zoe Darwin; Lisa Kidd; Christian Blickem; Kerri McPherson; Kate Hunt; Peter Bower; Simon Gilbody; Gerry Richardson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Complexity of care and strategies of self-management in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Dominik Ose; Eva C Winkler; Sarah Berger; Ines Baudendistel; Martina Kamradt; Felicitas Eckrich; Joachim Szecsenyi
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.711

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.