Literature DB >> 22574305

A large retroperitoneal tumor with psoas infiltration: A rare case report.

Subhash Goyal1, Mahesh Gupta, Rikki Singal, Rekha Goyal, Amit Mittal.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare neoplasms. Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging is performed in patients with these tumors to detect local extent and distant metastases of the tumor and for preoperative surgical planning. However the evaluation and treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas are challenging because of its rarity and frequent presentation with advanced disease in an anatomically complex location. CASE REPORT: We report a case of large retroperitoneal tumor in a female on the right flank. Ultrasound and Computed tomography scan of the abdomen revealed infiltration into the psoas muscle on the same side along with displacement of adjacent structures. Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology was suggested of liposarcoma. Surgical resection of the tumor was done. In follow up six months, patient was asymptomatic.
CONCLUSIONS: In case of retroperitoneal tumors CT scan remains the diagnostic modality of choice and the inefficiency of adjuvant therapy; high recurrence rate and the very low chance of curing the patient after recurrence make the prognosis of these patients poor. However surgical resection remains the optimum treatment in all cases of retroperitoneal tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sarcoma; fibrous histiocytoma; malignancy; surgery

Year:  2010        PMID: 22574305      PMCID: PMC3347637     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 1947-2714


Introduction

Retroperitoneal tumor constitutes only 10%-20% of all the sarcomas with an incidence of 0.3%-0.4% per 100000 population[1]. Although they may affect any age group, the peak incidence is found in 5th decade. These malignant tumors arise from mesenchymal cells and are usually located in muscle, fat, and connective tissues. They have varying clinical courses depending on their histological subtype and grade and are usually very large at the time of presentation[2]. CT and MRI are useful investigations to assess its extent and preoperative planning. The treatment options include radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgical resection, however surgery is found to be the optimum treatment.

Case Report

A 48-year old woman presented with a painful swelling in right flank of 5 month duration. Local examination revealed a non-tender, lobulated, firm mass of about 18 × 15 cm in size in the right flank. Routine investigations were normal. Abdominal ultrasonography (USG) revealed a primary retroperitoneal mass with liver and right kidney were pushed anterio-superiorly and pancreas anteriorly. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen showed a huge heterogeneous mass lesion of size 20cm × 13cm × 11cm in the retroperitoneal region on the right side extending superiorly up to the inferior surface of right lobe of liver, inferiorly up to the level of upper border of S1 vertebra. Laterally it extended just before the right lateral abdominal wall while medially it was abetting the aorta. Right kidney was displaced anterior-superiorly while the bowel loops and inferior vena cava were pushed anteromedially. The right psoas muscle was not separately visualized and was suggestive of infiltration. The fat planes between the mass and muscles of posterior abdominal wall and at places between the inferior surfaces of liver were also not well visualized suggestive of infiltration. Post contrast study revealed strong heterogeneous enhancement with non enhancing areas due to necrosis. No evidence of calcification was seen in the mass. The left kidney, pancreas and spleen and aorta appeared normal. Gall bladder was contracted without any lymphadenopathy. There was no bone erosion. Renal vein and artery were normal. USG guided fine needle aspiration was done which showed liposarcoma. On exploration there was a large encapsulated lobulated, firm tumor occupying the right half of the abdominal cavity which was adherent to the right kidney and infiltrating into the psoas major muscle. Tumor was separated from the aorta and kidney after adhenolysis. Debulking of the tumor was done and the resected specimen measured about 20 × 12 cm in size (Figs. 1–3).
Fig. 1

Gross specimen showing anterior view of retroperitoneal sarcoma. The right kidney was displace anterosuperiorly by the mass and the bowel loops and inferior vena cava were pushed anteromedially. The right psoas muscle was not separately visualized due to infiltration.

Fig. 3

The cut section of specimen showing features of malignant sarcoma in the retroperitoneum.

Gross specimen showing anterior view of retroperitoneal sarcoma. The right kidney was displace anterosuperiorly by the mass and the bowel loops and inferior vena cava were pushed anteromedially. The right psoas muscle was not separately visualized due to infiltration. Gross specimen showing posterior view of retroperitoneal sarcoma extending superiorly up to the inferior surface of the liver and inferiorly up to the S1 vertebra. Laterally it extended just before the right lateral abdominal wall while medially it was abetting the aorta. The cut section of specimen showing features of malignant sarcoma in the retroperitoneum. Histopathological findings revealed presence of numerous tumor giant cells along with numerous inflammatory cells consisting of polymorphs, lymphocytes and plasma cells and the diagnosis of inflammatory malignant fibrous histiocytoma was made. Patient is asymptomatic on subsequent follow-up of 6 months.

Discussion

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare tumors accounting for only 1%–2% of all solid malignancies arising from mesenchymal cells, which are usually located in muscle, fat, and connective tissues[23]. In different studies the most common types of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas in adults vary and the most commonly encountered histologic subtypes of retroperitoneal sarcoma remain liposarcoma(41%), leiomyosarcoma (28%), malignant fibrous histiocytoma (7%), fibrosarcoma (6%), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (3%)[3]. Commonest clinical presentation is an abdominal mass because of the fact that retroperitoneal sarcoma smaller than 5 cm usually remain silent. The only signs and symptom if any are non-specific e.g. vague abdominal discomfort or pain, weight loss, and early satiety where as some cases may present with intestinal obstruction or bleeding. Lower extremity swelling or pain has also been reported as presenting symptoms[4]. CT remains the diagnostic modality of choice in suspected retroperitoneal sarcoma. It facilitates accurate estimation of tumor location and size, its relationship to surrounding anatomic structures, and identification of metastatic lesions within the abdomen[5]. Primary radiation therapy for cure is seldom effective for retroperitoneal sarcomas but can provide palliation in selected cases. Systemic chemotherapy for chemo sensitive lesions, such as poorly differentiated liposarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH), synovial cell sarcoma, and primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET), can be useful when used in a neoadjuvant manner[6]. Consequently, surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas and requires enbloc resection of the primary tumor[7]. In case the tumor cannot be separated from the adjacent organs then the resection includes tumor along with the organ involved such as colon, small bowel, kidney, adrenal, and pancreas[8]. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation have not been proven to be of any additional benefit. Overall prognosis is influenced by tumor size, grading and resected margins. CT scans at every 6-month intervals can be of immense value to rule out any recurrence because these tumors usually recur within 2 years of initial surgical resection[9].

Conclusion

A rare case of retroperitoneal tumor of huge size infiltrating the psoas muscle is reported. Inflammatory malignant fibrous histiocytoma is extremely rare. However all the retroperitoneal tumors should be subjected to surgical excision to achieve optimum results.
  8 in total

1.  CT of recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas.

Authors:  A K Gupta; R H Cohan; I R Francis; V K Sondak; M Korobkin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Retroperitoneal sarcomas.

Authors:  T Christopher Windham; Peter W T Pisters
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 3.  CT characteristics of primary retroperitoneal neoplasms.

Authors:  Amy Neville; Brian R Herts
Journal:  Crit Rev Comput Tomogr       Date:  2004

Review 4.  Retroperitoneal sarcomas.

Authors:  F C Eilber; K S Eilber; F R Eilber
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2000-08

5.  Surgical management of 143 patients with adult primary retroperitoneal tumor.

Authors:  Yuan-Hong Xu; Ke-Jian Guo; Ren-Xuan Guo; Chun-Lin Ge; Yu-Lin Tian; San-Guang He
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Results of the national soft-tissue sarcoma registry.

Authors:  C Mettlin; R Priore; U Rao; D Gamble; W Lane; P Murphy
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Retroperitoneal sarcomas.

Authors:  Isaac R Francis; Richard H Cohan; Datla G K Varma; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  The value of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Authors:  Sepideh Gholami; Charlotte D Jacobs; Daniel S Kapp; Layla M Parast; Jeffrey A Norton
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2009-10-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.