Literature DB >> 22573909

A comparative assessment of torque generated by lingual and conventional brackets.

Iosif Sifakakis1, Nikolaos Pandis, Margarita Makou, Theodore Eliades, Christos Katsaros, Christoph Bourauel.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of bracket type on the labiopalatal moments generated by lingual and conventional brackets. Incognito™ lingual brackets (3M Unitek), STb™ lingual brackets (Light Lingual System; ORMCO), In-Ovation L lingual brackets (DENTSPLY GAC), and conventional 0.018 inch slot brackets (Gemini; 3M Unitek) were bonded on identical maxillary acrylic resin models with levelled and aligned teeth. Each model was mounted on the orthodontic measurement and simulation system and 10 0.0175 × 0.0175 TMA wires were used for each bracket type. The wire was ligated with elastomerics into the Incognito, STb, and conventional brackets and each measurement was repeated once after religation. A 15 degrees buccal root torque (+15 degrees) and then a 15 degrees palatal root torque (-15 degrees) were gradually applied to the right central incisor bracket. After each activation, the bracket returned to its initial position and the moments in the sagittal plane were recorded during these rotations of the bracket. One-way analysis of variance with post hoc multiple comparisons (Tukey test at 0.05 error rate) was conducted to assess the effect on bracket type on the generated moments. The magnitude of maximum moment at +15 degrees ranged 8.8, 8.2, 7.1, and 5.8 Nmm for the Incognito, STb, conventional Gemini, and the In-Ovation L brackets, respectively; similar values were recorded at -15 degrees: 8.6, 8.1, 7.0, and 5.7 Nmm, respectively. The recorded differences of maximum moments were statistically significant, except between the Incognito and STb brackets. Additionally, the torque angles were evaluated at which the crown torque fell well below the minimum levels of 5.0 Nmm, as well as the moment/torque ratio at the last part of the activation/deactivation curve, between 10 and 15 degrees. The lowest torque expression was observed at the self-ligating lingual brackets, followed by the conventional brackets. The Incognito and STb lingual brackets generated the highest moments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22573909     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjs029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  10 in total

1.  Torque efficiency of a customized lingual appliance : Performance of wires with three different ligature systems.

Authors:  Marco Migliorati; Daniela Poggio; Sara Drago; Alberto Lagazzo; Roberto Stradi; Fabrizio Barberis; Armando Silvestrini-Biavati
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  The biomechanics of posterior maxillary arch expansion using fixed labial and lingual appliances.

Authors:  Harsimrat Kaur; Brandon Owen; Bill Tran; Raymond Guan; Jeramy Luo; Alexander Granley; Jason P Carey; Paul W Major; Dan L Romanyk
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Customized lingual brackets vs. conventional labial brackets for initial alignment : A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Murat Kaptaç; Yazgı Ay Ünüvar
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.341

4.  Analysis of the torque capacity of a completely customized lingual appliance of the next generation.

Authors:  Stefan Lossdörfer; Carsten Bieber; Rainer Schwestka-Polly; Dirk Wiechmann
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets.

Authors:  Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Iosif Sifakakis; Ioannis Doulis; Theodore Eliades; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.750

Review 6.  Torque expression in self-ligating orthodontic brackets and conventionally ligated brackets: A systematic review.

Authors:  Yousef Al-Thomali; Roshan-Noor Mohamed; Sakeenabi Basha
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-01-01

7.  A Comparison of the Ligation Torque Expression of a Ribbonwise Bracket-Archwire Combination and a Conventional Combination: A Primary Study.

Authors:  Bin Lin; Feifei Jiang; Jie Chen; Jiaxing Liang
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.149

Review 8.  Are there differences in treatment effects between labial and lingual fixed orthodontic appliances? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fadi Ata-Ali; Teresa Cobo; Felix De Carlos; Juan Cobo; Javier Ata-Ali
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  The effect of occlusogingival placement of clinical bracket points on the adaptation of a straight wire to the lingual arch form.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Abdi; Saeed Reza Motamedian; Ehsan Balaghi; Mahtab Nouri
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Comparison of inclination and vertical changes between single-wire and double-wire retraction techniques in lingual orthodontics.

Authors:  Bui Quang Hung; Mihee Hong; Wonjae Yu; Hee-Moon Kyung
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 1.372

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.