Literature DB >> 22573813

Lesion processing by a repair enzyme is severely curtailed by residues needed to prevent aberrant activity on undamaged DNA.

Atanu Maiti1, Muhammad S Noon, Alexander D MacKerell, Edwin Pozharski, Alexander C Drohat.   

Abstract

DNA base excision repair is essential for maintaining genomic integrity and for active DNA demethylation, a central element of epigenetic regulation. A key player is thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG), which excises thymine from mutagenic G·T mispairs that arise by deamination of 5-methylcytosine (mC). TDG also removes 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine, oxidized forms of mC produced by Tet enzymes. Recent studies show that the glycosylase activity of TDG is essential for active DNA demethylation and for embryonic development. Our understanding of how repair enzymes excise modified bases without acting on undamaged DNA remains incomplete, particularly for mismatch glycosylases such as TDG. We solved a crystal structure of TDG (catalytic domain) bound to a substrate analog and characterized active-site residues by mutagenesis, kinetics, and molecular dynamics simulations. The studies reveal how TDG binds and positions the nucleophile (water) and uncover a previously unrecognized catalytic residue (Thr197). Remarkably, mutation of two active-site residues (Ala145 and His151) causes a dramatic enhancement in G·T glycosylase activity but confers even greater increases in the aberrant removal of thymine from normal A·T base pairs. The strict conservation of these residues may reflect a mechanism used to strike a tolerable balance between the requirement for efficient repair of G·T lesions and the need to minimize aberrant action on undamaged DNA, which can be mutagenic and cytotoxic. Such a compromise in G·T activity can account in part for the relatively weak G·T activity of TDG, a trait that could potentially contribute to the hypermutability of CpG sites in cancer and genetic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22573813      PMCID: PMC3361372          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1201010109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  57 in total

1.  Embryonic lethal phenotype reveals a function of TDG in maintaining epigenetic stability.

Authors:  Daniel Cortázar; Christophe Kunz; Jim Selfridge; Teresa Lettieri; Yusuke Saito; Eilidh MacDougall; Annika Wirz; David Schuermann; Angelika L Jacobs; Fredy Siegrist; Roland Steinacher; Josef Jiricny; Adrian Bird; Primo Schär
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Caught in the act: visualization of an intermediate in the DNA base-flipping pathway induced by HhaI methyltransferase.

Authors:  John R Horton; Gary Ratner; Nilesh K Banavali; Niu Huang; Yongseok Choi; Martin A Maier; Victor E Marquez; Alexander D MacKerell; Xiaodong Cheng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Investigation of the mechanisms of DNA binding of the human G/T glycosylase using designed inhibitors.

Authors:  O D Schärer; T Kawate; P Gallinari; J Jiricny; G L Verdine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cloning and expression of human G/T mismatch-specific thymine-DNA glycosylase.

Authors:  P Neddermann; P Gallinari; T Lettieri; D Schmid; O Truong; J J Hsuan; K Wiebauer; J Jiricny
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-05-31       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Dependence of substrate binding and catalysis on pH, ionic strength, and temperature for thymine DNA glycosylase: Insights into recognition and processing of G·T mispairs.

Authors:  Atanu Maiti; Alexander C Drohat
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-04-06

6.  Dissecting the broad substrate specificity of human 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylase.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Brien; Tom Ellenberger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Uracil-DNA glycosylase acts by substrate autocatalysis.

Authors:  A R Dinner; G M Blackburn; M Karplus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Enhanced CpG mutability and tumorigenesis in MBD4-deficient mice.

Authors:  Catherine B Millar; Jacky Guy; Owen J Sansom; Jim Selfridge; Eilidh MacDougall; Brian Hendrich; Peter D Keightley; Stefan M Bishop; Alan R Clarke; Adrian Bird
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Abasic sites in DNA: repair and biological consequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Serge Boiteux; Marie Guillet
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004-01-05

10.  Stoichiometry and affinity for thymine DNA glycosylase binding to specific and nonspecific DNA.

Authors:  Michael T Morgan; Atanu Maiti; Megan E Fitzgerald; Alexander C Drohat
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  30 in total

1.  E2-mediated small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) modification of thymine DNA glycosylase is efficient but not selective for the enzyme-product complex.

Authors:  Christopher T Coey; Megan E Fitzgerald; Atanu Maiti; Katherine H Reiter; Catherine M Guzzo; Michael J Matunis; Alexander C Drohat
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Excision of uracil from DNA by hSMUG1 includes strand incision and processing.

Authors:  Marina Alexeeva; Marivi N Moen; Kristin Grøsvik; Almaz N Tesfahun; Xiang Ming Xu; Izaskun Muruzábal-Lecumberri; Kristine M Olsen; Anette Rasmussen; Peter Ruoff; Finn Kirpekar; Arne Klungland; Svein Bjelland
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Recent advances in the structural mechanisms of DNA glycosylases.

Authors:  Sonja C Brooks; Suraj Adhikary; Emily H Rubinson; Brandt F Eichman
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-10-14

4.  Nucleosomes and the three glycosylases: High, medium, and low levels of excision by the uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily.

Authors:  Mary E Tarantino; Blaine J Dow; Alexander C Drohat; Sarah Delaney
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-09-20

5.  Structural basis of damage recognition by thymine DNA glycosylase: Key roles for N-terminal residues.

Authors:  Christopher T Coey; Shuja S Malik; Lakshmi S Pidugu; Kristen M Varney; Edwin Pozharski; Alexander C Drohat
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Excision of 5-Carboxylcytosine by Thymine DNA Glycosylase.

Authors:  Lakshmi S Pidugu; Qing Dai; Shuja S Malik; Edwin Pozharski; Alexander C Drohat
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Defining the Role of Nucleotide Flipping in Enzyme Specificity Using 19F NMR.

Authors:  Blaine J Dow; Shuja S Malik; Alexander C Drohat
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Selective excision of 5-carboxylcytosine by a thymine DNA glycosylase mutant.

Authors:  Hideharu Hashimoto; Xing Zhang; Xiaodong Cheng
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Activity and crystal structure of human thymine DNA glycosylase mutant N140A with 5-carboxylcytosine DNA at low pH.

Authors:  Hideharu Hashimoto; Xing Zhang; Xiaodong Cheng
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2013-05-13

Review 10.  Role of Base Excision "Repair" Enzymes in Erasing Epigenetic Marks from DNA.

Authors:  Alexander C Drohat; Christopher T Coey
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 60.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.