PURPOSE: Extensive correlative studies in human prostate cancer as well as studies in vitro and in mouse models indicate that fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling plays an important role in prostate cancer progression. In this study, we used a probe compound for an FGFR inhibitor, which potently inhibits FGFR-1-3 and significantly inhibits FGFR-4. The purpose of this study is to determine whether targeting FGFR signaling from all four FGFRs will have in vitro activities consistent with inhibition of tumor progression and will inhibit tumor progression in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Effects of AZ8010 on FGFR signaling and invasion were analyzed using immortalized normal prostate epithelial (PNT1a) cells and PNT1a overexpressing FGFR-1 or FGFR-4. The effect of AZ8010 on invasion and proliferation in vitro was also evaluated in prostate cancer cell lines. Finally, the impact of AZ8010 on tumor progression in vivo was evaluated using a VCaP xenograft model. RESULTS: AZ8010 completely inhibits FGFR-1 and significantly inhibits FGFR-4 signaling at 100 nmol/L, which is an achievable in vivo concentration. This results in marked inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation and invasion in PNT1a cells expressing FGFR-1 and FGFR-4 and all prostate cancer cell lines tested. Treatment in vivo completely inhibited VCaP tumor growth and significantly inhibited angiogenesis and proliferation and increased cell death in treated tumors. This was associated with marked inhibition of ERK phosphorylation in treated tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting FGFR signaling is a promising new approach to treating aggressive prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: Extensive correlative studies in humanprostate cancer as well as studies in vitro and in mouse models indicate that fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling plays an important role in prostate cancer progression. In this study, we used a probe compound for an FGFR inhibitor, which potently inhibits FGFR-1-3 and significantly inhibits FGFR-4. The purpose of this study is to determine whether targeting FGFR signaling from all four FGFRs will have in vitro activities consistent with inhibition of tumor progression and will inhibit tumor progression in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Effects of AZ8010 on FGFR signaling and invasion were analyzed using immortalized normal prostate epithelial (PNT1a) cells and PNT1a overexpressing FGFR-1 or FGFR-4. The effect of AZ8010 on invasion and proliferation in vitro was also evaluated in prostate cancer cell lines. Finally, the impact of AZ8010 on tumor progression in vivo was evaluated using a VCaP xenograft model. RESULTS:AZ8010 completely inhibits FGFR-1 and significantly inhibits FGFR-4 signaling at 100 nmol/L, which is an achievable in vivo concentration. This results in marked inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation and invasion in PNT1a cells expressing FGFR-1 and FGFR-4 and all prostate cancer cell lines tested. Treatment in vivo completely inhibited VCaP tumor growth and significantly inhibited angiogenesis and proliferation and increased cell death in treated tumors. This was associated with marked inhibition of ERK phosphorylation in treated tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting FGFR signaling is a promising new approach to treating aggressive prostate cancer.
Authors: Maija P Valta; Johanna Tuomela; Anders Bjartell; Eeva Valve; H Kalervo Väänänen; Pirkko Härkönen Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Victor D Acevedo; Rama D Gangula; Kevin W Freeman; Rile Li; Youngyou Zhang; Fen Wang; Gustavo E Ayala; Leif E Peterson; Michael Ittmann; David M Spencer Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Zhi Gang Li; Paul Mathew; Jun Yang; Michael W Starbuck; Amado J Zurita; Jie Liu; Charles Sikes; Asha S Multani; Eleni Efstathiou; Adriana Lopez; Jing Wang; Tina V Fanning; Victor G Prieto; Vikas Kundra; Elba S Vazquez; Patricia Troncoso; Austin K Raymond; Christopher J Logothetis; Sue-Hwa Lin; Sankar Maity; Nora M Navone Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Olga Dakhova; Mustafa Ozen; Chad J Creighton; Rile Li; Gustavo Ayala; David Rowley; Michael Ittmann Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Tobias Klein; Julie Tucker; Geoffrey A Holdgate; Richard A Norman; Alexander L Breeze Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2013-12-06 Impact factor: 4.345
Authors: Rhonda L Bitting; Daneen Schaeffer; Jason A Somarelli; Mariano A Garcia-Blanco; Andrew J Armstrong Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 9.264
Authors: Choong-Kun Lee; Myung Eun Lee; Won Suk Lee; Jeong Min Kim; Kyu Hyun Park; Tae Soo Kim; Kang Young Lee; Joong Bae Ahn; Hyun Cheol Chung; Sun Young Rha Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2014-12-15 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Longjiang Shao; Ibrahim Tekedereli; Jianghua Wang; Erkan Yuca; Susan Tsang; Anil Sood; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Bulent Ozpolat; Michael Ittmann Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Yu-Chen Lee; Martina Srajer Gajdosik; Djuro Josic; James G Clifton; Christopher Logothetis; Li-Yuan Yu-Lee; Gary E Gallick; Sankar N Maity; Sue-Hwa Lin Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: K E Ware; T K Hinz; E Kleczko; K R Singleton; L A Marek; B A Helfrich; C T Cummings; D K Graham; D Astling; A-C Tan; L E Heasley Journal: Oncogenesis Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 7.485