Literature DB >> 22573259

Oxygen tolerance in anaerobic pathogenic bacteria.

Ondřej Holý1, Dittmar Chmelař.   

Abstract

A prerequisite for successful identification of anaerobic pathogenic bacteria from samples of clinical material is the method of cultivation. Currently, several methods of cultivation in anaerobic environment are used: cultivation in anaerobic box, anaerobic jar, and in nonrecurring cultivation system. Here, we determined the suitability of the above methods of cultivation using the estimation of the growth (diameters of colony size) of commonly isolated anaerobic pathogens (Bacteroides fragilis, Clostridium difficile, and Clostridium perfringens). The tested bacterial strains were exposed to atmospheric oxygen for various time periods and then they were cultivated using different anaerobic cultivation systems. Maximum growth differed, depending on the type of cultivation and the strain used. Thus, largest zone diameters, in the majority of measurements, were achieved in the anaerobic box. However, nonrecurring cultivation system seemed better in several cases; this applied to the cultivation of C. perfringens after 15, 30, and 60 min exposure to atmospheric oxygen as well as the cultivation of B. fragilis after 30 and 60 min of oxygen exposure. The cultivation in anaerobic box was the most convenient method for growth of C. difficile. In almost all cases, higher growth was observed in nonrecurring cultivation system than in the system of anaerobic jar. On the other hand, no significant differences were observed among these anaerobic cultivation systems which confirmed their applicability (taking into account some individual features concerning the optimization of cultivations) for identification of pathogenic anaerobes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22573259     DOI: 10.1007/s12223-012-0149-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)        ISSN: 0015-5632            Impact factor:   2.099


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of recovery of anaerobic bacteria using the Anoxomat, anaerobic chamber, and GasPak jar systems.

Authors:  P H Summanen; M McTeague; M L Väisänen; C A Strong; S M Finegold
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.331

2.  In vitro susceptibility to selected antibiotics in bacteria of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

Authors:  D Chmelar
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 3.  Current issues and problems in dealing with anaerobes in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  S D Allen; J A Siders; L M Marler
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.935

4.  Evaluation of the AnaeroPack system for growth of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  K G Van Horn; K Warren; E J Baccaglini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Oxygen tolerance of human intestinal anaerobes.

Authors:  R D Rolfe; D J Hentges; J T Barrett; B J Campbell
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Comparison of quality control results with use of anaerobic chambers versus anaerobic jars.

Authors:  M E Cox; R J Kohr; C K Samia
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Evaluation of AnaeroGen system for growth of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  P H Miller; L S Wiggs; J M Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Effect of incubation conditions on anaerobic susceptibility testing results.

Authors:  P R Murray; A C Niles
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Oxidative stress response in Clostridium perfringens.

Authors:  Delphine Jean; Valérie Briolat; Gilles Reysset
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.777

10.  Comparative evaluation of anoxomat and conventional anaerobic GasPak jar systems for the isolation of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  May Shahin; Wafaa Jamal; Tina Verghese; V O Rotimi
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.927

View more
  5 in total

1.  Dynamics of predominant microbiota in the human gastrointestinal tract and change in luminal enzymes and immunoglobulin profile during high-altitude adaptation.

Authors:  Atanu Adak; Chiranjit Maity; Kuntal Ghosh; Bikas Ranjan Pati; Keshab Chandra Mondal
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Single cell analysis of nutrient regulation of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile motility.

Authors:  David S Courson; Astha Pokhrel; Cody Scott; Melissa Madrill; Alden J Rinehold; Rita Tamayo; Richard E Cheney; Erin B Purcell
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 3.331

3.  Chemical and Stress Resistances of Clostridium difficile Spores and Vegetative Cells.

Authors:  Adrianne N Edwards; Samiha T Karim; Ricardo A Pascual; Lina M Jowhar; Sarah E Anderson; Shonna M McBride
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  Clostridium difficile colitis and zoonotic origins-a narrative review.

Authors:  Alexander W W Brown; Robert B Wilson
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2018-06-28

5.  Effects of oxygen exposure on relative nucleic acid content and membrane integrity in the human gut microbiota.

Authors:  Mariia Taguer; Ophélie Quillier; Corinne F Maurice
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.