Literature DB >> 22573233

Self-perceived penile shortening after radical prostatectomy.

S Carlsson1, A E Nilsson, E Johansson, T Nyberg, O Akre, G Steineck.   

Abstract

The postoperative effect on penile length after radical prostatectomy has been the subject of studies with conflicting results. We analyzed self-perceived penile shortening, quality of life and self-esteem after radical prostatectomy. In this cross-sectional study of a cohort of 1411 men who underwent a radical prostatectomy at Karolinska University Hospital between 2002 and 2006, we used a study-specific questionnaire. Patients and controls were asked about their perceived penile shortening by comparing present penile length now and at age 30 years. All subjects were also asked about their present quality of life and self-esteem. Patients were compared with 442 age-matched population-based controls. Among 1288 who underwent radical prostatectomy and answered the questionnaire (response rate 91%), 663 patients reported self-perceived penile shortening (55%), as compared with 85 (26%) of 350 men in the control group, corresponding to a relative risk (RR) of 2.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-2.6) of self-perceived penile shortening compared with the age-matched control group. Age, grade of erectile dysfunction and angina were correlated with self-perceived penile shortening in both the operated and the control group. After adjustments for all of these mentioned potential confounders, we obtained a RR of 1.7 (95% CI 1.4-2.1) of self-perceived penile shortening compared with the controls. We also found that self-assessed penile shortening was associated with a RR of 1.2 (95% CI 1.1-1.3) for a low-to-moderate self-assessed quality of life and a RR of 1.2 (95% CI 1.1-1.4) for a low-to-moderate self estimation of self-esteem. Extensive nerve-sparing technique seems to be associated with less self-perceived penile shortening compared with radical prostatectomy with lower degree of nerve-sparing approach. These data indicate that radical prostatectomy is associated with self-perceived penile shortening and suggests that erectile function is a key factor in penile shortening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22573233     DOI: 10.1038/ijir.2012.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  8 in total

Review 1.  Focusing on sexual rehabilitation besides penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy is important.

Authors:  Daphné Vanderhaeghe; Maarten Albersen; Emmanuel Weyne
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 2.  Impact of Pelvic Anatomical Changes Caused by Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Kadono; Takahiro Nohara; Shohei Kawaguchi; Hiroaki Iwamoto; Hiroshi Yaegashi; Kazuyoshi Shigehara; Kouji Izumi; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Neglected side effects to curative prostate cancer treatments.

Authors:  Alexander B Nolsøe; Christian Fuglesang S Jensen; Peter B Østergren; Mikkel Fode
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  Longitudinal recovery patterns of penile length and the underexplored benefit of long-term phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor use after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Young Suk Kwon; Nicholas Farber; Ji Woong Yu; Kevin Rhee; Christopher Han; Patrick Ney; Jeong Hee Hong; Paul Lee; Nikhil Gupta; Wun-Jae Kim; Isaac Yi Kim
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 5.  Preoperative exercise interventions to optimize continence outcomes following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sean F Mungovan; Sigrid V Carlsson; Gregory C Gass; Petra L Graham; Jaspreet S Sandhu; Oguz Akin; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Manish I Patel
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 6.  Mapping the prevalence and use of questionnaires to detect the neglected sexual side effects after prostate cancer treatment: a scoping review.

Authors:  Pierre Röscher; Ronisha Sathiram; Joanne E Milios; Jacqueline M van Wyk
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-03

Review 7.  Pharmacologic and surgical therapies for sexual dysfunction in male cancer survivors.

Authors:  Ateş Kadıoğlu; Mazhar Ortaç; Gerald Brock
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-04

8.  Impact of Retzius-sparing Versus Standard Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Penile Shortening, Peyronie's Disease, and Inguinal Hernia Sequelae.

Authors:  Keith J Kowalczyk; Meghan Davis; John O'Neill; Harry Lee; Joanna Orzel; Rachel S Rubin; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2020-10-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.