Literature DB >> 22572963

Are long-term bisphosphonate users a reality? Dose years for current bisphosphonate users assessed using the danish national prescription database.

B Abrahamsen1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The prevalence of long-term bisphosphonate use may be low due to low refill compliance and gaps in treatment. An analysis of the prescription history of 58,674 bisphosphonate users in Denmark found that only 2.8 % had received ten dose years of treatment or above.
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to describe the demographics of present bisphosphonate (BP) users, to determine the prevalence of long-term BP use, and to establish if long-term use (a 10-year history of osteoporosis treatment) translated to ten dose years of bisphosphonate prescriptions filled, given the propensity for treatment gaps and low refill compliance with bisphosphonates.
METHODS: The study population was all persons aged 35 and above, who had filled at least one prescription for an oral bisphosphonate in the year 2008. Past use of osteoporosis medications (bisphosphonates, raloxifene, strontium ranelate, or PTH analogs) for the period January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2007 was retrieved from the Danish National Prescription Database for descriptive analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 58,674 BP users, 46 % were above the age of 75, and 13 % were men. Though 5.9 % had at least a 10-year history of treatment, only half (2.8 %) had received more than ten dose years of a BP. For any osteoporosis drug, 3.0 % had received ten dose years or more, while 23.2 % had received between 5 and 10 years of treatment.
CONCLUSION: Long-term users with ten dose years or more of a BP are rare due to periods of low compliance and gaps, with a discrepancy between the length of treatment and doses taken. The study also highlights the great number of patients who have used BP for more than five dose years and should be advised on length of treatment, a decision process that will be difficult due to the paucity of long-term safety and efficacy data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22572963     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-1994-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  14 in total

1.  Bisphosphonates and atypical femoral fractures: a time for reflection.

Authors:  J E Compston
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Safety of bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Michael Pazianas; Bo Abrahamsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; Steven T Harris; Clifford J Rosen; Charles E Barr; James N Arvesen; Thomas A Abbott; Stuart Silverman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Bisphosphonate use and atypical fractures of the femoral shaft.

Authors:  Jörg Schilcher; Karl Michaëlsson; Per Aspenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Pathophysiology of atypical femoral fractures and osteonecrosis of the jaw.

Authors:  J Compston
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Methodological considerations in using claims databases to evaluate persistence with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Joyce A Cramer; Stuart L Silverman; Deborah T Gold
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  To stop or not to stop, that is the question.

Authors:  Ego Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Initiation of anti-osteoporotic therapy in patients with recent fractures: a nationwide analysis of prescription rates and persistence.

Authors:  C Roerholt; P Eiken; B Abrahamsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Non-compliance: the Achilles' heel of anti-fracture efficacy.

Authors:  E Seeman; J Compston; J Adachi; M L Brandi; C Cooper; B Dawson-Hughes; B Jönsson; H Pols; J A Cramer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 10.  Subtrochanteric fractures after long-term treatment with bisphosphonates: a European Society on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis, and International Osteoporosis Foundation Working Group Report.

Authors:  R Rizzoli; K Akesson; M Bouxsein; J A Kanis; N Napoli; S Papapoulos; J-Y Reginster; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effects of clodronate and alendronate on osteoclast and osteoblast co-cultures on silk-hydroxyapatite films.

Authors:  Rebecca S Hayden; Moritz Vollrath; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Real-world persistence and adherence with oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  F Fatoye; P Smith; T Gebrye; G Yeowell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-14       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Mapping theme trends and recognizing hot spots in postmenopausal osteoporosis research: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Siming Zhou; Zhengbo Tao; Yue Zhu; Lin Tao
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.