Literature DB >> 22571999

Impact of vancomycin MIC creep on patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Yen-Cheng Yeh1, Kuo-Ming Yeh, Te-Yu Lin, Sheng-Kang Chiu, Ya-Sung Yang, Yung-Chih Wang, Jung-Chung Lin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: To date, vancomycin is still the standard treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, but minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) creep is becoming a major concern. The aims of this study were to investigate trends in vancomycin use and MIC values over the last decade at our institute and to evaluate the outcomes of bacteremic patients infected with MRSA isolates with reduced vancomycin susceptibility.
METHODS: Vancomycin use and density were evaluated using the defined daily doses (DDD) method. Patients with MRSA bacteremia were enrolled retrospectively. Patient demographic data and clinical outcomes were analyzed. The first isolate from each patient was collected for E-testing in order to determine vancomycin MIC. MIC trends were assessed as MIC(50), MIC(90), and the geometric mean.
RESULTS: Vancomycin use has increased over the last decade. One hundred and forty patients were enrolled and their respective isolates were retrieved, including isolates from 45 patients in 2001, 46 patients in 2005, and 49 patients in 2009. The geometric mean (± standard deviation) of the vancomycin MIC for MRSA isolates obtained in 2009 was 1.39 ± 0.30 μg/mL, which is significantly higher than the mean vancomycin MIC obtained in 2001 (1.19 ± 0.34 μg/mL, p < 0.01) and 2005 (1.99 ± 0.25 μg/mL, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in terms of the in-hospital mortality rate between patients with MRSA isolates with MICs ≥ 1.5 μg/mL or < 1.5 μg/mL.
CONCLUSION: We identified a significant upward trend in the use of vancomycin and its MIC over the last decade. This study shows that patients infected with MRSA isolates with high MICs (≥1.5 μg/mL) do not have a significantly higher mortality rate compared with isolates with low MICs (<1.5 μg/mL).
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22571999     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmii.2011.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect        ISSN: 1684-1182            Impact factor:   4.399


  11 in total

1.  Vancomycin MIC Does Not Predict 90-Day Mortality, Readmission, or Recurrence in a Prospective Cohort of Adults with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  Sanjiv M Baxi; Angelo Clemenzi-Allen; Alice Gahbauer; Daniel Deck; Brandon Imp; Eric Vittinghoff; Henry F Chambers; Sarah Doernberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Assessment of Vancomycin MIC Creep Phenomenon in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Lahore.

Authors:  Faiqa Arshad; Sidrah Saleem; Shah Jahan; Romeeza Tahir
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

3.  Temporins A and B stimulate migration of HaCaT keratinocytes and kill intracellular Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Antonio Di Grazia; Vincenzo Luca; Li-Av T Segev-Zarko; Yechiel Shai; Maria Luisa Mangoni
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Is it time to replace vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections?

Authors:  Sebastiaan J van Hal; Vance G Fowler
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Vancomycin use, dosing and serum trough concentrations in the pediatric population: a retrospective institutional review.

Authors:  Kevin Rajon; Regis Vaillancourt; Nisha Varughese; Gilda Villarreal
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2017-06-30

6.  Reporting elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: consensus by an International Working Group.

Authors:  Mark Wilcox; Suleiman Al-Obeid; Ana Gales; Roman Kozlov; José A Martínez-Orozco; Flavia Rossi; Sergey Sidorenko; Joseph Blondeau
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.165

7.  Correlation between antimicrobial consumption and incidence of health-care-associated infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci at a university hospital in Taiwan from 2000 to 2010.

Authors:  Chih-Cheng Lai; Chen-Chen Chu; Aristine Cheng; Yu-Tsung Huang; Po-Ren Hsueh
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 4.399

8.  Lessons Learned from an Experience with Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Outbreak in a Newly Built Secondary Hospital in Korea.

Authors:  Min Hyung Kim; Yong Chan Kim; Heejung Kim; Hyuk Min Lee; Ju Hyun Lee; Da Ae Kim; Chanhee Kim; Jin Young Park; Yoon Soo Park
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-05-06

9.  Risk factors of treatment failure and 30-day mortality in patients with bacteremia due to MRSA with reduced vancomycin susceptibility.

Authors:  Chien-Chang Yang; Cheng-Len Sy; Yhu-Chering Huang; Shian-Sen Shie; Jwu-Ching Shu; Pang-Hsin Hsieh; Ching-Hsi Hsiao; Chih-Jung Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Genomic insights on heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A first report from South India.

Authors:  Yamuna Devi Bakthavatchalam; Priyanka Babu; Elakkiya Munusamy; Hariharan Triplicane Dwarakanathan; Priscilla Rupali; Marcus Zervos; Peter John Victor; Balaji Veeraraghavan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.