Literature DB >> 22571842

Spinal loads during position changes.

A Rohlmann1, R Petersen, V Schwachmeyer, F Graichen, G Bergmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recommendations exist how patients should change from one body position to another in order to keep the spinal loads low. However, until now it is not clear whether the loads are in fact lower if the patients follow these recommendations. The aim was to measure the loads while changing the body position.
METHODS: Telemeterized vertebral body replacements have been inserted into 5 patients who had a severe compression fracture of a lumbar vertebral body. The acting loads were measured during a changing of the body position while lying and when moving from lying to sitting, from sitting to standing and vice versa.
FINDINGS: When the lying patients changed their position according to the physiotherapist's recommendations, the resultant force was nearly as high as it was during relaxed standing. Otherwise, the force was nearly twice as high. Changing from a lateral lying position to sitting and vice versa caused forces of about 180% of those seen for standing when the recommendations were heeded. Without instructions, the loads were about 70% higher. Use of a trapeze bar mounted to the bed did not increase the loads. Rising from a chair with the arms hanging down laterally led to average resultant forces of 380% related to standing. Placing the hands on armrests reduced this value to 180%.
INTERPRETATION: High forces may act on the spine when changing from one body position to another. These loads can be minimized when following the physiotherapist's instructions and when supporting the upper body by the arms.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22571842     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  10 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical loading of the intervertebral disc: from the macroscopic to the cellular level.

Authors:  Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke; Fabio Galbusera; Harris Pratsinis; Eleni Mavrogonatou; Antje Mietsch; Dimitris Kletsas; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  In vivo measurements of the effect of whole body vibration on spinal loads.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Hendrik Schmidt; Ulf Gast; Ines Kutzner; Philipp Damm; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Finite element analysis of the hip and spine based on quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Dana Carpenter
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Interbody Spacer Material Properties and Design Conformity for Reducing Subsidence During Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Lillian S Chatham; Vikas V Patel; Christopher M Yakacki; R Dana Carpenter
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 5.  'SMART' implantable devices for spinal implants: a systematic review on current and future trends.

Authors:  Sihyong J Kim; Tian Wang; Matthew H Pelletier; William R Walsh
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-03

6.  Changes in bone mineral density in unconscious immobile stroke patients from the acute to chronic phases of brain diseases.

Authors:  Shoko Merrit Yamada
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2022-09-21

7.  Activities of everyday life with high spinal loads.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; David Pohl; Alwina Bender; Friedmar Graichen; Jörn Dymke; Hendrik Schmidt; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  High-resolution, three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging axial load dynamic study improves diagnostics of the lumbar spine in clinical practice.

Authors:  Tomasz Lorenc; Marek Gołębiowski; Wojciech Michalski; Wojciech Glinkowski
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-01-18

9.  Spinal loads during post-operative physiotherapeutic exercises.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Verena Schwachmeyer; Friedmar Graichen; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Comparison of In Vivo Intradiscal Pressure between Sitting and Standing in Human Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Qi Li; Wai-Hang Kwong; Yuk-Lam Chan; Masato Kawabata
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.