G Williams1, C Willmott. 1. Physiotherapy Department, Epworth Hospital, Richmond, Victoria, Australia. gavin.williams@epworth.org.au
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Participation rates and quality-of-life (QoL) have been a major focus of rehabilitation programmes and outcome studies following traumatic brain injury (TBI). The extent to which mobility limitations impact on participation rates and QoL has not been thoroughly explored. The main aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between mobility limitations, participation rates and QoL following TBI. METHODS: Thirty-nine people who had sustained an extremely severe TBI were recruited from a major rehabilitation facility. Mobility was quantified using the high-level mobility assessment tool (HiMAT). The Brain Injury Community Rehabilitation Outcome (BICRO-39) and Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) were used to measure participation rates and the shorter version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQoL-BREF) and Assessment of Quality-of-Life (AQoL-2) were used to measure QoL. RESULTS: Mobility was most strongly correlated with the total BICRO-39 score (r = -0.60, p < 0.001) and the mobility domain (r = -0.59, p < 0.001) of the BICRO-39. Although mobility had a significant relationship with health-related QoL, AQoL-2 (r = 0.60, p < 0.001), it was most strongly related to the AQoL-2 independent living domain (r = 0.79, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Greater capacity to mobilize was associated with higher participation rates and better QoL.
INTRODUCTION: Participation rates and quality-of-life (QoL) have been a major focus of rehabilitation programmes and outcome studies following traumatic brain injury (TBI). The extent to which mobility limitations impact on participation rates and QoL has not been thoroughly explored. The main aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between mobility limitations, participation rates and QoL following TBI. METHODS: Thirty-nine people who had sustained an extremely severe TBI were recruited from a major rehabilitation facility. Mobility was quantified using the high-level mobility assessment tool (HiMAT). The Brain Injury Community Rehabilitation Outcome (BICRO-39) and Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) were used to measure participation rates and the shorter version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQoL-BREF) and Assessment of Quality-of-Life (AQoL-2) were used to measure QoL. RESULTS: Mobility was most strongly correlated with the total BICRO-39 score (r = -0.60, p < 0.001) and the mobility domain (r = -0.59, p < 0.001) of the BICRO-39. Although mobility had a significant relationship with health-related QoL, AQoL-2 (r = 0.60, p < 0.001), it was most strongly related to the AQoL-2 independent living domain (r = 0.79, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Greater capacity to mobilize was associated with higher participation rates and better QoL.
Authors: Francesca E Wade; Grace K Kellaher; Sarah Pesquera; Sidney T Baudendistel; Arkaprava Roy; David J Clark; Rachael D Seidler; Daniel P Ferris; Todd M Manini; Chris J Hass Journal: J Biomech Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Laura Zdziarski-Horodyski; MaryBeth Horodyski; Kalia K Sadasivan; Jennifer Hagen; Terrie Vasilopoulos; Matthew Patrick; Robert Guenther; Heather K Vincent Journal: Trials Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Christopher Malone; Kimberly S Erler; Joseph T Giacino; Flora M Hammond; Shannon B Juengst; Joseph J Locascio; Risa Nakase-Richardson; Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez; John Whyte; Nathan Zasler; Yelena G Bodien Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Liana Praça Oliveira; Reginaldo Florencio da Silva; Marie Aquino Melo de Leopoldino; Sarah Carvalho Frota; Gabriella Coelho Vieira de Melo Alves; Jefferson Pacheco Amaral Fortes; Pedro Henrique Gomes Muniz; Gisele Harumi Hotta; Francisco Carlos de Mattos Brito Oliveira; Francisco Fleury Uchoa Santos-Júnior Journal: Appl Bionics Biomech Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 1.664
Authors: Zara Trafford; Erna van der Westhuizen; Shona McDonald; Margi Linegar; Leslie Swartz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-06 Impact factor: 3.390