Literature DB >> 22571623

Reducing the number of laboratory animals used in tissue engineering research by restricting the variety of animal models. Articular cartilage tissue engineering as a case study.

Rob B M de Vries1, Pieter Buma, Marlies Leenaars, Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga, Bert Gordijn.   

Abstract

The use of laboratory animals in tissue engineering research is an important underexposed ethical issue. Several ethical questions may be raised about this use of animals. This article focuses on the possibilities of reducing the number of animals used. Given that there is considerable debate about the adequacy of the current animal models in tissue engineering research, we investigate whether it is possible to reduce the number of laboratory animals by selecting and using only those models that have greatest predictive value for future clinical application of the tissue engineered product. The field of articular cartilage tissue engineering is used as a case study. Based on a study of the scientific literature and interviews with leading experts in the field, an overview is provided of the animal models used and the advantages and disadvantages of each model, particularly in terms of extrapolation to the human situation. Starting from this overview, it is shown that, by skipping the small models and using only one large preclinical model, it is indeed possible to restrict the number of animal models, thereby reducing the number of laboratory animals used. Moreover, it is argued that the selection of animal models should become more evidence based and that researchers should seize more opportunities to choose or create characteristics in the animal models that increase their predictive value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22571623     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2012.0059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev        ISSN: 1937-3368            Impact factor:   6.389


  12 in total

Review 1.  Seeding cell approach for tissue-engineered urethral reconstruction in animal study: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing-Dong Xue; Jing Gao; Qiang Fu; Chao Feng; Hong Xie
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-03-27

2.  Reduction of sample size requirements by bilateral versus unilateral research designs in animal models for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Patrick Orth; David Zurakowski; Mauro Alini; Magali Cucchiarini; Henning Madry
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  Clinical relevance assessment of animal preclinical research (RAA) tool: development and explanation.

Authors:  Kurinchi S Gurusamy; David Moher; Marilena Loizidou; Irfan Ahmed; Marc T Avey; Carly C Barron; Brian Davidson; Miriam Dwek; Christian Gluud; Gavin Jell; Kiran Katakam; Joshua Montroy; Timothy D McHugh; Nicola J Osborne; Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga; Kees van Laarhoven; Jan Vollert; Manoj Lalu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  A systematic review and meta-analyses on animal models used in bone adhesive research.

Authors:  Machteld Van Erk; Judith Van Luijk; Fang Yang; Sander C G Leeuwenburgh; María J Sánchez-Fernández; Erik Hermans; Rosa P Félix Lanao; Harry Van Goor
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.102

Review 5.  The usefulness of systematic reviews of animal experiments for the design of preclinical and clinical studies.

Authors:  Rob B M de Vries; Kimberley E Wever; Marc T Avey; Martin L Stephens; Emily S Sena; Marlies Leenaars
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2014

6.  Clinical protocol levels are required in laboratory animal surgery when using medical devices: experiences with ureteral replacement surgery in goats.

Authors:  Paul K J D de Jonge; Marije Sloff; Heinz P Janke; Barbara B M Kortmann; Robert P E de Gier; Paul J Geutjes; Egbert Oosterwijk; Wout F J Feitz
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Augmented cartilage regeneration by implantation of cellular versus acellular implants after bone marrow stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.

Authors:  Michiel W Pot; Toin H van Kuppevelt; Veronica K Gonzales; Pieter Buma; Joanna IntHout; Rob B M de Vries; Willeke F Daamen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Progress in using systematic reviews of animal studies to improve translational research.

Authors:  C R Hooijmans; M Ritskes-Hoitinga
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 9.  Tissue engineering in animal models for urinary diversion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marije Sloff; Rob de Vries; Paul Geutjes; Joanna IntHout; Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga; Egbert Oosterwijk; Wout Feitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Improved cartilage regeneration by implantation of acellular biomaterials after bone marrow stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.

Authors:  Toin H van Kuppevelt; Rob B M de Vries; Michiel W Pot; Veronica K Gonzales; Pieter Buma; Joanna IntHout; Willeke F Daamen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.