Literature DB >> 22570012

Symptomatic residual instability with grade II acromioclavicular injury.

Hyun-Seok Song1, Si Young Song, Yon-Sik Yoo, Yong Beom Lee, Young-Jin Seo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of arthroscopic distal clavicle resection in cases presenting with pain and subtle instability after neglected grade II acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation.
METHODS: From February 1998 to May 2006, 17 patients with symptomatic AC instability following chronic grade II AC joint injury were studied. Sixteen patients were male and one female, with a mean age of 48 years. An all-arthroscopic procedure comprising disk removal and distal clavicle resection was performed in all cases. All patients were reviewed clinically, preoperatively and at final follow-up (mean 38 months) using the pain score on a visual analog scale and the Constant score. Strength was measured using an Isobex digital strength analyzer. Patient's personal satisfaction after the procedure was documented as excellent, good or poor. Postoperative AC joint radiographs were routinely obtained in all patients to measure the amount of clavicle resection.
RESULTS: Two patients underwent additional reconstructive surgery for disabling pain and dysfunction even after the arthroscopic resection procedure. The remaining 15 patients were analyzed. The pain scores improved significantly (p = 0.03). The mean pain score was 5.8 (range 5-9) before treatment and 1.6 (range 0-3) at follow-up. The Constant scores had improved significantly at the final follow-up (p = 0.001). The median Constant score increased from 46 (range 36-69) preoperatively to 71 (range 48-84) postoperatively. Strength had improved at the last follow-up. Eleven patients were satisfied and six were not satisfied with this procedure at the final follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic distal clavicle resection statistically improved the pain score, Constant score and strength for grade II AC injury with subtle distal clavicle instability. However, six patients (33.5 %) were not satisfied subjectively. This procedure seemed to be a reasonable initial treatment option with lower morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22570012     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-012-0239-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  4 in total

1.  Acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Ryan J Warth; Frank Martetschläger; Trevor R Gaskill; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-03

2.  Surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation with autogenous tendon grafts.

Authors:  Kaisa J Virtanen; Vesa Savolainen; Ilkka Tulikoura; Ville Remes; Ville Haapamäki; Jarkko Pajarinen; Jan-Magnus Björkenheim; Mika Paavola
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-08-10

3.  Treatment of acromioclavicular joint separations in Japan: a survey.

Authors:  Katsumi Takase; Yukihiko Hata; Yutaka Morisawa; Masafumi Goto; Sakae Tanaka; Junichiro Hamada; Kenji Hayashida; Yasunari Fujii; Toru Morihara; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Hiroaki Inui; Hiroyuki Shiozaki
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-10-31

4.  Acromioclavicular Joint Disk Tearing in Young Non-Arthritic Individuals: A Case Series.

Authors:  Andrew W Kuhn; John E Kuhn; Scott M LaTulip; James E Carpenter
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2020 May-Jun
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.