OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of the willingness and ability of older workers to continue working until the age of 65. METHODS: In this longitudinal study, 4937 employees aged 45 to 63 years included in the Netherlands Working Conditions Cohort Study were studied. Logistic regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: Employees who experienced emotional exhaustion and bullying or harassment by colleagues/supervisor were less often willing to continue working, whereas employees sometimes using force were more often willing to continue working. Emotional exhaustion, a work handicap, higher physical and emotional demands, lower supervisor's support, and intermediate satisfaction with salary predicted a lower likelihood to be able to continue working. CONCLUSION: Prevention of emotional exhaustion and promotion of a healthy social work climate may support both the willingness and ability to work until the age of 65 years.
OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of the willingness and ability of older workers to continue working until the age of 65. METHODS: In this longitudinal study, 4937 employees aged 45 to 63 years included in the Netherlands Working Conditions Cohort Study were studied. Logistic regression analyses were applied. RESULTS: Employees who experienced emotional exhaustion and bullying or harassment by colleagues/supervisor were less often willing to continue working, whereas employees sometimes using force were more often willing to continue working. Emotional exhaustion, a work handicap, higher physical and emotional demands, lower supervisor's support, and intermediate satisfaction with salary predicted a lower likelihood to be able to continue working. CONCLUSION: Prevention of emotional exhaustion and promotion of a healthy social work climate may support both the willingness and ability to work until the age of 65 years.
Authors: Philippe Kiss; Marc De Meester; Tage S Kristensen; Lutgart Braeckman Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2014-03-01 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Evelien H van Leeuwen; Eva Knies; Elizabeth L J van Rensen; Toon W Taris Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Erica E M Maurits; Anke J E de Veer; Lucas S van der Hoek; Anneke L Francke Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: A Fattori; L Neri; E Aguglia; A Bellomo; A Bisogno; D Camerino; B Carpiniello; A Cassin; G Costa; P De Fazio; G Di Sciascio; G Favaretto; C Fraticelli; R Giannelli; S Leone; T Maniscalco; C Marchesi; M Mauri; C Mencacci; G Polselli; R Quartesan; F Risso; A Sciaretta; M Vaggi; S Vender; U Viora Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-10-18 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Marta Sousa-Ribeiro; Claudia Bernhard-Oettel; Magnus Sverke; Hugo Westerlund Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 3.390