Literature DB >> 22568752

Kin association during brood care in a facultatively social bird: active discrimination or by-product of partner choice and demography?

Kim Jaatinen1, Kristina Noreikiene, Juha Merilä, Markus Ost.   

Abstract

Intra-group relatedness does not necessarily imply kin selection, a leading explanation for social evolution. An overlooked mechanism for generating population genetic structure is variation in longevity and fecundity, referred to as individual quality, affecting kin structure and the potential for cooperation. Individual quality also affects choosiness in partner choice, a key process explaining cooperation through direct fitness benefits. Reproductive skew theory predicts that relatedness decreases with increasing group size, but this relationship could also arise because of quality-dependent demography and partner choice, without active kin association. We addressed whether brood-rearing eider (Somateria mollissima) females preferentially associated with kin using a 6-year data set with individuals genotyped at 19 microsatellite loci and tested whether relatedness decreased with increasing female group size. We also determined the relationship between local relatedness and indices of female age and body condition. We further examined whether the level of female intracoalition relatedness differed from background relatedness in any year. As predicted, median female intra-group relatedness decreased with increasing female group size. However, the proportion of related individuals increased with advancing female age, and older females prefer smaller brood-rearing coalitions, potentially producing a negative relationship between group size and relatedness. There were considerable annual fluctuations in the level of relatedness between coalition-forming females, and in 1year this level exceeded that expected by random association. Thus, both passive and active mechanisms govern kin associations in brood-rearing eiders. Eiders apparently can discriminate between kin, but the benefits of doing so may vary over time.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22568752     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05603.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  2 in total

1.  Family-based guilds in the ant Pachycondyla inversa.

Authors:  Heikki Helanterä; Oliver Aehle; Maurice Roux; Jürgen Heinze; Patrizia d'Ettorre
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Relative importance of social status and physiological need in determining leadership in a social forager.

Authors:  Markus Öst; Kim Jaatinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.