| Literature DB >> 22567567 |
Kudige N Prashanth1, Kanakapura Basavaiah.
Abstract
Three simple and sensitive spectrophotometric methods are proposed for the determination of atenolol (ATN) in bulk drug and tablets. The methods are based on the bromination of ATN by the bromine generated in situ by the action of the acid on the bromate-bromide mixture followed by the determination of unreacted bromine by reacting with a fixed amount of either meta-cresol purple (MCP) and measuring the absorbance at 540 nm (method A) and 445 nm (method B) or erioglaucine (EGC) and measuring the absorbance at 630 nm (method C). Beer's law is valid within the concentration ranges of 1.0-20.0, 2.0-40.0 and 1.0-8.0 μg/mL for method A, method B and method C, respectively. The calculated molar absorptivities were found to be 1.20×10(4), 4.51×10(3) and 3.46 × 10(4) L/mol · cm for method A, method B and method C, respectively. Sandell's sensitivity values, correlation coefficients, limits of detection and quantification are also reported. Recovery results were statistically compared with those of a reference method by applying Student's t- and F-test. The novelty of the present study is the measurement of two different colors using MCP, that is, red-pink color of MCP in acid medium at 540 nm and yellowish-orange color of brominated MCP at 445 nm.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22567567 PMCID: PMC3335304 DOI: 10.1155/2012/810156
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anal Methods Chem ISSN: 2090-8873 Impact factor: 2.193
Comparison of the proposed and the existing visible spectrophotometric methods.
| Sl. No. | Reagent/s used | Reagent used |
| Linear range, | LOD, | Reaction time, min | Remarks | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | Hydroxylamine hydrochloride-iron (III) | Ferric hydroxamate complex measured | 510 | 50–800 ( | NR | 20–30 | Less sensitive, heating required | [ |
|
| ||||||||
| (2) | Chloranilic acid | Charge transfer complex measured | 534 | 25–250 | NR | — | Less sensitive, use of organic solvents | [ |
|
| ||||||||
| (3) | Chloranilic acid | Charge transfer complex measured | 530 | 10–280 | NA | NA | -do- | [ |
|
| ||||||||
| (4) | Acetaldehyde-Chloranil | 690 | NA | NA | NA | Use of organic solvents | [ | |
|
| ||||||||
| (5) | NH4VO3 | Reaction rate measured | 750 | NA | NA | NA | Heating required | [ |
|
| ||||||||
| (6) | 4-chloro-7-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole | Coupling product measured as a function of time | 460 | 5–50 | 1.3 | 30 | Heating required | [ |
|
| ||||||||
| (7) | Potassium permanganate- in alkaline medium | Unreacted KMnO4 measured | 526 | 4 hrs | Time-consuming, involve judicial control of many experimental variables | [ | ||
| Rate-constant method | 6.66–10.65 | |||||||
| Fixed-concentration method | 6.66–5.33 | |||||||
| Fixed-time method | 6.66–7.99 | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| (8) | Sodium nitroprusside | Complex of ammonia and nitroprusside measured | 495 | 0.5–30 ( | 0.01 | 5 | Heating required | [ |
|
| ||||||||
| (9) | Chloramine-T-metol-sulphanilic acid | Unreacted chloramine-T measured | 520 | 2.5–25 ( | 2.34 | 20 | Less sensitive | [ |
|
| ||||||||
| (10) | Chloramine-T: | |||||||
| (a) Metanil yellow | Unreacted chloramine-T measured | 530 | 1–12 | 0.32 | 10 | [ | ||
| (b) Indigo carmine | 610 | 2.5–20 ( | 0.04 | 10 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| (11) | Bromate-bromide mixture- methyl orange | Unreacted bromine measured | 520 | 0.5–4.0 ( | 0.07 | 15 | [ | |
|
| ||||||||
| (12) | Phenol red | The change in the color of phenol red measured | 430 | 3.0–30 ( | 4.61 | — | Less sensitive | [ |
|
| ||||||||
| (13) | Bromate-bromide mixture: | Simple, sensitive and no heating step. No | This | |||||
| (a) MCP | Unreacted MCP in acid measured | 540 | 1.0–20.0 ( | 0.12 | 15 | |||
| (b) MCP | Bromo-derivative of MCP measured | 445 | 2.0–40.0 ( | 0.56 | 10 | |||
| (c) EGC | Unreacted EGC in acid measured | 630 | 1.0–8.0 ( | 0.05 | 10 | |||
MCP: metacresol purple, EGC: erioglaucine, NR: not reported, NA: not available.
Figure 1Method A: 1 mL 80 μg/mL MCP; 2 mL 5 M HCl. Method B: Brominated product of MCP (1 mL 40 μg/mL bromated-bromide mixture; 2 mL 5 M HCl; 1 mL 80 μg/mL MCP). Method C: Sample: 1 mL 40 μg/mL ATN; 5 mL 1 M HCl; 1 mL 18 μg/mL bromated-bromide mixture; 1 mL 300 μg/mL EG. Blank: 5 mL 1 M HCl; 1 mL 18 μg/mL bromated-bromide mixture; 1 mL 300 μg/mL EG.
Figure 2Tentative reaction scheme for the proposed methods.
Figure 3Effect of acid on the color development of the measured species for the proposed methods.
Regression and analytical parameters.
| Parameter | Method A | Method B | Method C |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 540 | 445 | 630 |
| Beer's law limits ( | 1–20 | 2–40 | 1–8 |
| Molar absorptivity (L/mol · cm) | 1.20 × 104 | 4.51 × 103 | 3.46 × 104 |
| Sandell sensitivity* ( | 0.0223 | 0.0591 | 0.0077 |
| Limit of detection ( | 0.12 | 0.56 | 0.05 |
| Limit of quantification ( | 0.36 | 1.69 | 0.14 |
| Regression equation, | |||
| Intercept | 0.0038 | 0.7755 | 0.0217 |
| Slope | 0.0443 | −0.0154 | 0.1229 |
| Correlation coefficient ( | 0.9996 | −0.9973 | 0.9992 |
| Standard deviation of intercept ( | 0.00664 | 0.08471 | 0.01436 |
| Standard deviation of slope ( | 0.00059 | 0.00378 | 0.00292 |
*Limit of determination as the weight in μg per ml of solution, which corresponds to an absorbance of A = 0.001 measured in a cuvette of cross-sectional area 1 cm2 and l = 1 cm. **Y = a + bX, where Y is the absorbance, a is the intercept, b is the slope, and X is the concentration in μg/mL.
Evaluation of intraday and interday precision and accuracy.
| Method | ATN taken ( | Intraday ( | Interday ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATN founda ( | %RSDb | %REc | ATN founda ( | %RSDb | %REc | ||
| Method A | 4.00 | 4.14 | 1.49 | 1.71 | 4.09 | 1.86 | 2.25 |
| 8.00 | 8.12 | 0.75 | 1.56 | 8.16 | 1.34 | 2.00 | |
| 12.00 | 4.0 | 0.67 | 1.04 | 12.31 | 1.28 | 2.58 | |
| Method B | 8.00 | 8.22 | 1.74 | 2.69 | 8.19 | 2.14 | 2.38 |
| 16.00 | 16.25 | 1.06 | 1.58 | 16.44 | 2.08 | 2.75 | |
| 24.00 | 24.63 | 0.56 | 2.62 | 24.85 | 1.72 | 3.54 | |
| Method C | 2.00 | 1.99 | 1.64 | 0.46 | 2.05 | 2.14 | 2.50 |
| 4.00 | 4.09 | 2.09 | 2.44 | 4.14 | 2.56 | 3.50 | |
| 6.00 | 6.07 | 1.47 | 1.09 | 6.16 | 2.63 | 2.67 | |
aMean value of five determinations; brelative standard deviation (%); crelative error (%).
Robustness and ruggedness.
| Method | ATN taken, | Method robustness | Method ruggedness | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters altered | |||||
| Volume of | Reaction timeb
| Interanalysts' | Inter instruments' | ||
| A | 4.00 | 1.26 | 1.46 | 1.34 | 2.64 |
| 8.00 | 0.72 | 1.72 | 0.85 | 3.18 | |
| 12.00 | 0.64 | 1.28 | 1.03 | 3.03 | |
| B | 8.00 | 0.85 | 1.39 | 1.42 | 2.86 |
| 16.00 | 0.52 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 2.47 | |
| 24.00 | 1.18 | 1.15 | 1.33 | 3.26 | |
| C | 2.00 | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.06 | 3.42 |
| 4.00 | 0.96 | 1.39 | 0.88 | 2.78 | |
| 6.00 | 1.08 | 0.76 | 1.24 | 2.37 | |
aIn methods A and B, the volume of 5 M HCl was 1.8, 2.0, and 2.2 mL whereas in method C, the volume of 1 M HCl was 4.8, 5.0, and 5.2 mL b The reaction time in methods A was 14, 15, and 16 min whereas in methods B and C, the same was 9, 10, and 11 min.
Results of analysis of tablets by the reference and proposed methods.
| Tablet Brand name | Label claim mg/tablet | Found (percent of label claim ± SD)a | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference method | Proposed methods | ||||
| Method A | Method B | Method C | |||
| Atenex-25b | 25 | 100.3 ± 0.58 | 100.9 ± 1.06 | 99.65 ± 0.96 | 101.0 ± 1.12 |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |||
| Atekind-50c | 50 | 99.67 ± 0.67 | 101.0 ± 1.09 | 100.6 ± 1.36 | 99.81 ± 1.42 |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |||
| Aten-100d | 100 | 100.6 ± 0.82 | 100.6 ± 1.11 | 101.1 ± 1.37 | 99.72 ± 1.69 |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |||
aMean value of five determinations. b,d Marketed by Zydas Healthcare, East Sikkim, India, c Marketed by Mankind Pharma Ltd., New Delhi, India, Tabulated t-value at the 95% confidence level is 2.78. Tabulated F-value at the 95% confidence level is 6.39.
Results of recovery study by standard addition method.
| Tablets | Method A | Method B | Method C | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATN in tablets, | Pure ATN | Total | Pure ATN | ATN in | Pure ATN | Total | Pure ATN | ATN in | Pure ATN | Total found, | Pure ATN | |
| Atenex 25 | 4.08 | 2.0 | 6.07 | 99.5 ± 2.29 | 7.97 | 4.0 | 12.01 | 101.00 ± 2.74 | 2.02 | 1.0 | 3.05 | 103.00 ± 1.76 |
| 4.08 | 4.0 | 8.03 | 98.75 ± 2.79 | 7.97 | 8.0 | 15.93 | 99.50 ± 2.35 | 2.02 | 2.0 | 4.09 | 103.5 ± 1.98 | |
| 4.08 | 6.0 | 10.15 | 101.17 ± 1.22 | 7.97 | 12.0 | 20.10 | 101.08 ± 0.98 | 2.02 | 3.0 | 5.11 | 103.00 ± 1.52 | |
| Atekind 50 | 3.99 | 2.0 | 6.06 | 103.5 ± 1.91 | 8.05 | 4.0 | 12.16 | 102.75 ± 2.15 | 1.99 | 1.0 | 3.00 | 101.00 ± 0.97 |
| 3.99 | 4.0 | 8.14 | 103.75 ± 1.04 | 8.05 | 8.0 | 16.15 | 101.25 ± 2.76 | 1.99 | 2.0 | 4.02 | 101.50 ± 1.58 | |
| 3.99 | 6.0 | 10.23 | 104.00 ± 2.51 | 8.05 | 12.0 | 20.44 | 103.25 ± 2.40 | 1.99 | 3.0 | 5.03 | 101.33 ± 1.79 | |
| Aten 100 | 4.02 | 2.0 | 6.10 | 104.00 ± 2.31 | 8.09 | 4.0 | 12.18 | 102.25 ± 1.56 | 1.99 | 1.0 | 3.02 | 103.00 ± 2.13 |
| 4.02 | 4.0 | 8.16 | 103.5 ± 1.43 | 8.09 | 8.0 | 16.35 | 103.25 ± 2.45 | 1.99 | 2.0 | 4.05 | 103.00 ± 2.06 | |
| 4.02 | 6.0 | 10.29 | 104.5 ± 2.77 | 8.09 | 12.0 | 20.34 | 102.08 ± 1.47 | 1.99 | 3.0 | 5.07 | 102.67 ± 1.91 | |
*Mean value of three determinations.