| Literature DB >> 22567428 |
Balázs Barkóczi1, Gábor Juhász, Robert G Averkin, Imre Vörös, Petra Vertes, Botond Penke, Viktor Szegedi.
Abstract
AMPA and NMDA receptors convey fast synaptic transmission in the CNS. Their relative contribution to synaptic output and phosphorylation state regulate synaptic plasticity. The AMPA receptor subunit GluA1 is central in synaptic plasticity. Phosphorylation of GluA1 regulates channel properties and trafficking. The firing rate averaged over several hundred ms is used to monitor cellular input. However, plasticity requires the timing of spiking within a few ms; therefore, it is important to understand how phosphorylation governs these events. Here, we investigate whether the GluA1 phosphorylation (p-GluA1) alters the spiking patterns of CA1 cells in vivo. The antidepressant Tianeptine was used for inducing p-GluA1, which resulted in enhanced AMPA-evoked spiking. By comparing the spiking patterns of AMPA-evoked activity with matched firing rates, we show that the spike-trains after Tianeptine application show characteristic features, distinguishing from spike-trains triggered by strong AMPA stimulation. The interspike-interval distributions are different between the two groups, suggesting that neuronal output may differ when new inputs are activated compared to increasing the gain of previously activated receptors. Furthermore, we also show that NMDA evokes spiking with different patterns to AMPA spike-trains. These results support the role of the modulation of NMDAR/AMPAR ratio and p-GluA1 in plasticity and temporal coding.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22567428 PMCID: PMC3337492 DOI: 10.1155/2012/286215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Figure 1Schematic outline of the experiment. CA1 cells were excited by a small (a) or large (b) dose of excitatory compound (AMPA or NMDA). In a second set of experiments, AMPA receptor phosphorylation (GluA1 subunit), which might lead to increased AMPA receptor surface expression and subsequent rise in AMPA-evoked firing rate, was induced by an intraperitoneal tianeptine injection (c). Strong excitations triggered larger firing rates than weak excitations (d). Representative spike trains, superimposed spikes, and autocorrelograms of the same unit before (e) and 15 min after tianeptine injection (f). Red line marks the ejection event. Scale bars are 50 μV and 1 sec and 0.1 ms.
Figure 2PSTH and ISI probability profiles of different spike trains. There is no difference between the PSTHs of spike trains evoked by weak excitation (a); in contrast, strong AMPA-evoked spiking activity decayed faster than strong NMDA or AMPA after tianeptine spike trains (b). ISI probability distributions of weak excitation evoked spike trains (c). Inset shows the ISI values for the second probability peak (marked with a grey rectangle). ISI probability distributions of strong excitation evoked spike trains (d). Inset shows the ISI values for the maximal probabilities. Note the difference between strong AMPA and AMPA after tianeptine. Colors in the insets correspond to the colors in the main figure. Asterisks denote significant differences at P ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3Temporal evolution of spiking dynamics. The time courses of discharge trains were normalized, and a parabola was fitted onto the 1/ISI values (a). Note that the maximal intensity is attained for both AMPA and NMDA excitation regardless of the strength, which happens later than in the AMPA after tianeptine scenario (b). Asterisks denote significant differences at P ≤ 0.05.