| Literature DB >> 22567046 |
O R Temneanu1, C Zamfir, F Eloaie Zugun, E Cojocaru, L Tocan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Even if the reactive oxygen species were discovered, described and detailed a long time ago, there is still little data about the mechanisms of oxidative stress, their tissular effects and about an efficient antioxidant strategy, involving animal experimental models. It has been shown that the lung is one of the most exposed organs to the oxidative stress. The particular effects of different types of oxidative stress on lungs were investigated in this experimental study, in order to quantify the intensity and the extent of the pulmonary damage, featuring the antioxidant enzymatic protective role.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant defense; oxidative stress; superoxide dismutase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22567046 PMCID: PMC3168820
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Life ISSN: 1844-122X
Figure 1Group 1–control. Normal pulmonary morphology. HE staining X 100
Figure 2Group 2. Inflammatory areas. HE staining X 200
Figure 3Group 3. Perialveolar fibrosis. HE staining X 100
Figure 4Reduced septal alveolar epithelium thickening. HE staining X 100
Figure 5Control group SOD 1–no staining, X100
Figure 6Group 2. SOD1 positive lining bronchiolar epithelial cells, X200
Figure 7Group 3. SOD1 positive lining alveolar walls and respiratory epithelium, X200
Figure 8Group 4. SOD 1 moderate staining of bronchiolar epithelium, X200
Descriptive analysis of SOD/group of rats
| Lot | R0 | R1 | R2 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| media | SD | CV% | media | SD | CV% | dif R0 | media | SD | CV% | ||
| 1 | 183.76 | 13.06 | 7.11 | 183.61 | 16.99 | 9.25 | –0.08 | 179.88 | 10.56 | –2.11 | |
| 2 | 173.46 | 16.65 | 9.60 | 260.77 | 23.37 | 8.96 | 50.33 | 269.44 | 17.08 | 55.33 | |
| 3 | 174.32 | 18.63 | 10.69 | 186.25 | 15.96 | 8.57 | 6.84 | 246.49 | 18.95 | 41.40 | |
| 4 | 170.03 | 14.95 | 183.25 | 18.17 | 9.92 | 7.77 | 188.63 | 20.88 | 11.07 | 10.94 |
SOD comparison between the control group and the groups exposed to stress
| Lot 1 vs | R0 | R1 | R2 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t | p | t | p | t | p | |||||||
| Lot 2 | 1.38 | p>0.05 | 7.55 | 12.61 | ||||||||
| Lot 3 | 1.17 | p>0.05 | 0.32 | p>0.05 | 8.68 | |||||||
| Lot 4 | 1.96 | p>0.05 | 0.04 | p>0.05 | 1.06 | p>0.05 |
Descriptive analysis of catalase/group of rats
| R0 | R1 | R2 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lot | media | SD | CV% | media | SD | CV% | dif R0 | media | SD | CV% | dif. R0 |
| 1 | 40.72 | 0.34 | 40.83 | 0.43 | 1.06 | 0.27 | 40.80 | 0.42 | 1.03 | 0.21 | |
| 2 | 40.88 | 0.44 | 1.08 | 55.97 | 1.14 | 2.05 | 36.92 | 60.95 | 0.42 | 49.12 | |
| 3 | 40.92 | 0.54 | 1.32 | 46.10 | 1.01 | 2.19 | 12.66 | 50.91 | 0.42 | 24.43 | |
| 4 | 40.70 | 0.61 | 1.50 | 41.85 | 0.65 | 1.56 | 2.83 | 43.15 | 0.60 | 6.02 |
Catalase comparison between the control group and the groups exposed to stress
| Lot 1 vs | R0 | R1 | R2 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t | p | t | p | t | p | |||||||
| Lot 2 | 0.81 | p>0.05 | 35.15 | 95.95 | ||||||||
| Lot 3 | 0.89 | p>0.05 | 13.58 | 48.14 | ||||||||
| Lot 4 | 0.08 | p>0.05 | 3.70 | 9.08 |