Literature DB >> 22566859

CRP/anti-CRP antibodies assembly on the surfaces of cell remnants switches their phagocytic clearance toward inflammation.

Christina Janko1, Sandra Franz, Luis E Munoz, Stefan Siebig, Silke Winkler, Georg Schett, Kirsten Lauber, Ahmed Sheriff, Johan van der Vlag, Martin Herrmann.   

Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by the production of autoantibodies, formation of immune complexes (IC), and activation of complement that ultimately fuel acute and/or chronic inflammation. Accumulation in blood and tissues of post-apoptotic remnants is considered of etiological and pathological importance for patients with SLE. Besides receptors directly recognizing apoptotic cells, soluble opsonins of the innate immune system bind apoptotic material dependent on the stage of apoptosis. We describe the binding to the surface of secondary necrotic cells (SNEC) of the serum opsonin CRP and further opsonins. We show that anti-dsDNA and anti-CRP autoantibodies bind and sensitize SNEC. Autoantibody-sensitized SNEC were cleared by macrophages in vitro and induced a pro-inflammatory cytokine response. In conclusion, anti-CRP, CRP, and SNEC form a ternary pyrogen endowed with strong pro-inflammatory capabilities which is able to maintain and perpetuate chronic inflammation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRP; SLE; anti-dsDNA; immune complexes; inflammation; opsonins

Year:  2011        PMID: 22566859      PMCID: PMC3341995          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


Introduction

Accumulation in blood and tissues of post-apoptotic remnants is discussed to be of etiological and pathological importance for patients with Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) since the pathognomonic autoantigens are sequestered inside viable cells. They are, therefore, not accessible to the immune system in healthy persons. These autoantigens are often exposed during cell death. The formation of major complexes containing cellular debris and autoantibodies has been observed in patients with SLE and proposed to be an important pathogen (Munoz et al., 2009). Sensibilization of cellular remnants with autoantibodies shifts the phagocytosis of dead cells from liver and spleen to blood–borne phagocytes, which do not take up unsensitized material. This antibody-dependent pro-inflammatory pathway initiates an amplification loop of inflammation and contributes to the chronification of the autoimmune response (Munoz et al., 2010c). The recognition by macrophages, of dead cell remnants is based on phosphatidylserine (PS) or on sugar neo-epitopes exposed on the plasma membranes (Schlegel and Williamson, 2001; Bottcher et al., 2006; Franz et al., 2006; Ravichandran and Lorenz, 2007). PS is recognized either directly by receptors as a “nude” lipid, or in combination with soluble proteins working as “adaptor molecules” or “opsonins” that bridge phagocytes and dead cells. These opsonins include milk fat globule protein MFGE8 (Hanayama et al., 2002), growth arrest specific gene product GAS-6 (ligand for the receptor tyrosine kinase MerTK; Scott et al., 2001), β-2-glycoprotein-1 (Balasubramanian and Schroit, 1998), serum-derived protein S (Anderson et al., 2003), annexin I (Arur et al., 2003), annexin A5 (Bondanza et al., 2004), C-reactive protein (CRP; Janko et al., 2009), C1q (Taylor et al., 2000), mannose-binding lectin (Nauta et al., 2004), serum amyloid P-component (Manfredi et al., 2008), the long Pentraxin 3 (Rovere et al., 2000), and further phospholipid or carbohydrate recognizing proteins (Franz et al., 2006; Beer et al., 2008; Sarter et al., 2009). The binding of these opsonins is often dependent on the stage of apoptosis, with PS recognition preceding that of carboneoepitopes (Franz et al., 2007). All these molecules mediate recognition and uptake of dying cells by macrophages and act as bridging opsonins that modulate the inflammatory and immunogenic potential of apoptotic material. Some of them additionally participate in complement activation (Ogden and Elkon, 2006). C-reactive protein binds to damaged cell membranes via (lyso)phosphatidylcholine and efficiently activates the classical complement pathway avoiding the assembly of the membrane attack complex (MAC). CRP acts as an opsonin supporting ingestion of apoptotic cells by human macrophages and plays a role in the clearance of apoptotic cells, especially during acute phase reactions (Gershov et al., 2000; Vogt et al., 2007). In the case of primary necrosis, the action of nucleases causes an increase in the binding of CRP to necrotic cells that may foster their silent elimination (Janko et al., 2009). Generally opsonins for dead cells tend to be anti-inflammatory and ameliorate clearance. Their interaction with its cognate receptor of the phagocytic cell often attenuates inflammatory responses (Voll et al., 1997; Aderem and Underhill, 1999). In patients with chronic inflammatory autoimmune diseases these opsonins for dying or dead cells are often targets of autoantibodies (Table 1). Intriguingly, in almost all cases the autoantibodies target only the surface bound opsonins and ignore their circulating counterparts (Shoenfeld et al., 2007; Sjowall et al., 2007; Bigler et al., 2009). The autoimmune response is, therefore, directed against opsonized material and not against the fluid phase proteins (Bell et al., 1998; Shoenfeld et al., 2007; Schaller et al., 2009). The autoantibody-dependent engagement of Fcγ receptors may have devastating consequences since it is prone to shift the process of waste disposal toward inflammation.
Table 1

Opsonins of dead and dying cells as targets of humoral autoimmunity.

OpsoninIgG autoantibodies reported in
C1qSiegert et al. (1991)
Protein SOosting et al. (1993)
Annexin A5Matsuda et al. (1994)
β2-GP1Tincani et al. (1996)
(PS)Manfredi et al. (1998)
CRPSjowall et al. (2002)
MBLSeelen et al. (2003)
SAPZandman-Goddard et al. (2005)
PTX3Bassi et al. (2010)
Annexin A1Kretz et al. (2010)
GalectinsOwn data
Opsonins of dead and dying cells as targets of humoral autoimmunity. Here we describe the exposure of binding sites of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies and of innate opsonins on the surfaces of post-apoptotic remnants and the recognition of these targets by autoantibodies against dsDNA and against surface bound CRP, respectively. The autoantibodies promote the release of inflammatory cytokines by macrophages in both conditions. We postulate that anti-opsonin autoantibodies, opsonins, and (post)apoptotic material form a ternary pyrogen that fuels chronic inflammation in patients with SLE.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Thirty nine patients from our outpatient clinic met the classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for SLE were included in this study (Hochberg, 1997). Thirty five NHD served as a control population. An informed consent was obtained from all blood donors and the study received the final approval from the ethics committee of the University Hospital Erlangen. Serum samples were obtained by centrifugation at 1000 g for 15 min of clotted blood, stored at −20°C, thawed once for ELISA, and stored again until phagocytosis assays.

Isolation of CRP

Human CRP was purified from human serum by calcium-dependent affinity chromatography with immobilized phosphorylcholine (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). The monomeric CPR was removed by filtration through Amicon Ultra centrifugation columns (Millipore, MA, USA). The purity of isolated CRP was assured by SDS PAGE and analytical HPLC.

Serological parameters

Anti-dsDNA autoantibodies were detected by the ability of specific serum antibodies to bind radiolabeled dsDNA employing the Farr method (Wold et al., 1968) adapted by Kredich et al. (1973). Anti-CRP autoantibodies were detected by ELISA, briefly, NUNC maxisorp 96-well microtiter plates (Nalgene Nunc, New York, NY, USA) were coated overnight at 4°C with 2 μg/well native human CRP in Coating buffer (0.1 M Na2CO3, 0.1 M Na HCo3, pH 9,6) and blocked for 2 h with 1% BSA in PBS. Patient sera were diluted 1:100 in 1% BSA/PBS-0.05% Tween, added in duplicates and incubated for 60 min. After washing with PBS-0.05% Tween, HRP-conjugated rabbit F(ab′)2 anti-human IgG (Southern Biotech) was diluted 1:10000 in PBS-Tween, added to each well and incubated for 60 min. After washing with PBS-Tween, the substrate (1 mg/ml TMB, 0.1 M Na2HPO4, 0.05 M Citric Acid, 0.006% H2O2, pH 5) was added to each well and incubated at room temperature. After 15 min the reaction was stopped with 25% sulfuric acid. Optical densities (OD) were measured at 450 nm. To discriminate positive from negative sera a cutoff was set at the mean value of NHD population plus 2 SD.

Secondary necrotic cell-derived material

Periphereal blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) served as source for secondary necrotic cell-derived material (SNEC). PBMC were isolated from whole blood by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation using Lymphoflot (Bio-Rad, Dreieich, Germany). Remaining platelets were removed by centrifugation through heat inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) and PBMC were subsequently reconstituted in PBS (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). Finally SNEC was produced by UVB irradiation (180 mJ/cm2) of PBMC. In order to achieve uniform staining with Trypan blue (0.02%) or propidium iodide (1 μg/ml) in late stages of apoptosis, the lymphocytes were treated with heat (56°C) for 30 min and stored at 4°C in PBS until use. All particles generated by this method showed homogeneous fluorescence staining, scatter, and ligand-binding characteristics detected by flow-cytometry. We further characterized SNEC by analyzing the binding of the following fluorescent labeled dying and dead cell ligands as well as control proteins: BSA, Narcissus pseudonarcissus lectin (Npn), acetylated low density lipoprotein (acLDL), chicken annexin A5 (AxA5), human CRP. Human complement components C1q and C3c, and human IgG were detected employing fluorescent labeled specific antibodies, as control served heat inactivated human serum and NHD serum, respectively. Fluorescence microscopy pictures were done by staining SNEC with propidium iodide and monoclonal antibodies recognizing dsDNA and apoptotic nucleosomes. In the phagocytosis assays SNEC stained with trypan blue was incubated with patients’ sera, respectively for 30 min. Not bound serum proteins were removed by a washing step. For the evaluation of the role of the opsonin CRP in the formation of ternary complexes, selected anti-dsDNA negative sera from patients with SLE were previously adsorbed 2× against immobilized Phosphorylcholine (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) and SNEC to remove CRP and anti-SNEC antibodies, respectively.

Ligand specific interaction employing inert particles

We employed Sephadex beads coated with protein G (Pharmacia) to immobilize the anti-dsDNA monoclonal antibody 33.C9 or normal human IgG. Sephadex beads coated with phosphorylcholine were used to immobilize CRP in the presence or absence of calcium. Coated beads were incubated with fluorescent SNEC for 30 min at room temperature and immediately analyzed by fluorescence microscopy.

Macrophage preparation

Leukocytes were isolated from heparinized human peripheral blood by density-gradient centrifugation (Ficoll-Paque PLUS, GE Healthcare). Monocytes were enriched by anti-CD14 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Macrophages were generated by culturing CD14+ monocytes for 6 days in RPMI (Biochrome) supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 1% glutamine (both Gibco) and 10% heat inactivated FCS (Biochrome), in the presence of 50 U/ml GM-CSF (Behringwerke, Marburg, Germany).

Phagocytosis assays

Phagocytosis assays were performed in two independent experiments with sera from two patients with SLE of each group (anti-dsDNA−/anti-CRP−, anti-dsDNA+/anti-CRP−, anti-dsDNA+/anti-CRP+, anti-dsDNA−/anti-CRP+) or NHD. Phagocytosis assays were performed as follows; macrophages were rinsed with PBS to wash off serum components of the macrophage differentiation medium. Macrophages were co-cultured with trypan blue-labeled SNEC (non-opsonized or opsonized with different patients sera) in a ratio of 1:10 in serum free medium containing 100 ng/ml LPS at 37°C. After 1 h non-internalized SNEC were removed and macrophages detached with trypsin/EDTA. Phagocytosing macrophages were quantified by flow-cytometry.

Cytokine quantification

Supernatants from phagocytosis cultures were collected after 18 or 24 h in co-culture with SNEC. Cytokines IL-8, TNF, and IL-10 were quantified by either ELISA (Peprotech) or multiplex bead array technology (Bender Medsystems, Vienna, Austria).

Statistics

Association between parameters were evaluated by a bivariate correlation test. Data are presented as mean ± SD, with n = number of independent experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated using a Student’s t test. All statistic calculations were done with the software SPSS-Statistics 18.0.

Results

Secondary necrotic cells-derived material exposes binding sites for several opsonins

Considering the importance of dsDNA as autoantigen in SLE and the tight interaction between degraded nuclear DNA and CRP, we analyzed its localization in SNEC by flow-cytometry, indirect immunofluorescence, and ligand specific interaction with inert particles. We observed that after execution of apoptosis, peripheral blood lymphocytes contain high amounts of degraded DNA (Figure 1A) and show low binding of C3c, high binding of acLDL, NPn lectin, AxA5, C1q, CRP, and IgG from patients with SLE (Figure 1B, gray curves). Black histograms correspond to BSA–FITC binding as control for AxA5, CRP, acLDL, NPn lectin; to anti-C3c and anti-C1q staining in the presence of decomplemented serum; and to anti-IgG in the presence of NHD serum, respectively. The binding to SNEC of C1q and of autoantibodies from patients with SLE but not that of CRP was abolished by treatment of SNEC with DNase. SNEC show a random distribution of autoantibody (anti-dsDNA and anti-apoptotic nucleosomes) targets on their surfaces that do not overlap with the nuclear chromatin (Figure 1C). To test whether the binding sites for anti-dsDNA and for CRP are not sequestered inside the SNEC but are accessible on their surfaces we employed anti-dsDNA antibodies and CRP immobilized on beads mimicking the curvature of effector phagocytes, respectively. Co-incubation of fluorescent SNEC demonstrates its specific interaction with both immobilized anti-dsDNA and immobilized CRP, respectively. SNEC was captured by beads coated with anti-dsDNA or with CRP but not by those coated with normal human IgG or with CRP-beads in absence of calcium (Figures 1D,E). These experiments reveal that (1) CRP binding sites are accessible for CRP and (2) that both dsDNA and CRP bound to CRP binding sites are accessible for autoantibodies and for professional phagocytes on the surfaces of SNEC.
Figure 1

SNEC contain DNA, detected by staining with propidium iodide (PI) (A). SNEC bind AxA5, NPn lectin, acLDL, CRP, serum C1q, and C3c depicted as gray curves as detected by flow-cytometry (B). IgG from patients with SLE sensitize SNEC [(B), right histograms]. BSA–FITC for labeled opsonins, heat inactivated human serum for complement, and NHD serum for SLE serum served as controls, respectively and are shown as black histograms. After treatment with DNAse-1 [(B), lower row], the binding of complement proteins and of IgG from SLE patients is reduced. SNEC expose binding sites for monoclonal antibodies recognizing dsDNA [(C), upper slide] and apoptotic nucleosomes [(C), lower slide]. Binding sites for anti-dsDNA [(D) lower row] and for CRP [(E), lower row] are accessible on the surfaces of SNEC and may, therefore, be employed by phagocytes for uptake. Negative controls (see Materials and Methods) are displayed in the upper rows of D/E.

SNEC contain DNA, detected by staining with propidium iodide (PI) (A). SNEC bind AxA5, NPn lectin, acLDL, CRP, serum C1q, and C3c depicted as gray curves as detected by flow-cytometry (B). IgG from patients with SLE sensitize SNEC [(B), right histograms]. BSA–FITC for labeled opsonins, heat inactivated human serum for complement, and NHD serum for SLE serum served as controls, respectively and are shown as black histograms. After treatment with DNAse-1 [(B), lower row], the binding of complement proteins and of IgG from SLE patients is reduced. SNEC expose binding sites for monoclonal antibodies recognizing dsDNA [(C), upper slide] and apoptotic nucleosomes [(C), lower slide]. Binding sites for anti-dsDNA [(D) lower row] and for CRP [(E), lower row] are accessible on the surfaces of SNEC and may, therefore, be employed by phagocytes for uptake. Negative controls (see Materials and Methods) are displayed in the upper rows of D/E.

Autoantibodies against the dead cells opsonin CRP are frequently found in patients with SLE and do not correlate with anti-dsDNA

C-reactive protein interacts with SNEC and may facilitate their phagocytic clearance. SNEC–CRP complexes characterize SLE patients and are seldom found in healthy persons, since apoptotic cells rarely get secondary necrotic in the latter. In the absence of proper clearance bound CRP may itself become a target for the autoimmune response. Therefore, we measured the anti-CRP and anti-dsDNA reactivity in sera from 39 patients with SLE and 35 NHD. Autoantibodies of the IgG isotype were detected in 61.5 and 2.7% (p < 0.001) of the patients with SLE and of healthy donors, respectively (Figure 2A). Anti-CRP did not correlate with anti-dsDNA (Farr assay; Figure 2B). This allowed us to study the individual contribution of these autoantibodies in the uptake by macrophages of sensitized SNEC and their subsequent cytokine responses.
Figure 2

Autoantibodies against CRP are frequently found in sera of patients with SLE (A). Anti-CRP levels do not correlate with anti-dsDNA levels (B).

Autoantibodies against CRP are frequently found in sera of patients with SLE (A). Anti-CRP levels do not correlate with anti-dsDNA levels (B).

Sensibilization of SNEC with autoantibodies promotes their uptake by macrophages and fuels an inflammatory cytokine response

Macrophages were co-cultured with (I) pure SNEC or (II) SNEC pre-incubated with serum from healthy donors, or (III) sera from patients with SLE. The latter contained (IIIa) neither anti-dsDNA nor anti-CRP, (IIIb) anti-dsDNA only, (IIIc) anti-CRP only; (IIId) anti-dsDNA; and anti-CRP (Figure 3A). Treatment of SNEC with autoantibody positive sera results in an elevated uptake by macrophages, whereas phagocytosis of SNEC incubated with autoantibody negative serum does not. Sensibilization of SNEC with anti-dsDNA and anti-CRP antibodies promoted the highest phagocytosis index (p < 0.05; Figure 3B).
Figure 3

Sensibilization with autoantibodies enhances uptake by macrophages of SNEC and drives an inflammatory cytokine response. Sera selected for phagocytosis assays are shown in (A). SNEC treated with autoantibody positive sera are more efficiently engulfed by macrophages (B). Sensibilization with serum of SNEC induces an elevated macrophage cytokine response upon uptake. In the presence of both anti-dsDNA and anti-CRP phagocytosis of SNEC induces the highest levels of IL-8 and TNF (C,D). This indicates an autoantibody-dependent shift toward an inflammatory cytokine response.

Sensibilization with autoantibodies enhances uptake by macrophages of SNEC and drives an inflammatory cytokine response. Sera selected for phagocytosis assays are shown in (A). SNEC treated with autoantibody positive sera are more efficiently engulfed by macrophages (B). Sensibilization with serum of SNEC induces an elevated macrophage cytokine response upon uptake. In the presence of both anti-dsDNA and anti-CRP phagocytosis of SNEC induces the highest levels of IL-8 and TNF (C,D). This indicates an autoantibody-dependent shift toward an inflammatory cytokine response. Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells is typically anti-inflammatory. We, therefore, analyzed the cytokine profile of LPS triggered macrophages after the uptake of SNEC in the presence and absence of opsonins. SNEC sensitized with serum of patients with SLE induces an increased production of IL-8 and TNF and a reduced release of IL-10 when compared with SNEC treated with the serum of healthy donors. Figures 3C,D shows the ratios of IL-8 and TNF in relation to IL-10. However, phagocytosis of SNEC targeted with anti-dsDNA and anti-CRP antibodies promoted the strongest inflammatory cytokine response as seen by the highest IL-8 and TNF ratios (Figures 3C,D).

SNEC, the opsonin CRP, and anti-CRP autoantibodies form ternary complexes that shift clearance of apoptotic cells toward inflammation

To evaluate the role of CRP, of anti-CRP autoantibodies during the clearance process of SNEC, we depleted CRP and anti-SNEC from anti-dsDNA negative/anti-CRP positive sera. These procedures remove the target structure for anti-CRP antibodies as well as other possible anti-SNEC antibodies. Depleted and reconstituted anti-CRP containing sera were used to sensitize SNEC for phagocytosis. Opsonisation with CRP or sensibilization with anti-CRP antibodies or both does not influence the phagocytosis by macrophages of SNEC (Figure 4A). However, the cytokine profile measured in the culture supernatants showed a significant higher TNF/IL-10 ratio if SNEC was opsonized with CRP and sensitized with anti-CRP autoantibodies, respectively (Figure 4B). The ternary complex of SNEC, CRP, and anti-CRP fosters the pro-inflammatory response of the macrophages.
Figure 4

Ternary complexes of autoantibodies and opsonized apoptotic cell remnants provoke inflammation upon uptake by macrophages. The phagocytosis by macrophages of SNEC was not influenced by the opsonisation with CRP or sensibilization with anti-CRP or both when compared to non-opsonized SNEC (A). However, the cytokine profile measured in the culture supernatants showed significantly higher TNF/IL-10 ratio if SNEC was opsonized with CRP and sensitized with anti-CRP (B).

Ternary complexes of autoantibodies and opsonized apoptotic cell remnants provoke inflammation upon uptake by macrophages. The phagocytosis by macrophages of SNEC was not influenced by the opsonisation with CRP or sensibilization with anti-CRP or both when compared to non-opsonized SNEC (A). However, the cytokine profile measured in the culture supernatants showed significantly higher TNF/IL-10 ratio if SNEC was opsonized with CRP and sensitized with anti-CRP (B).

Discussion

In previous work, we have definitely demonstrated that autoantibodies promote phagocytosis of SNEC by blood–borne phagocytes and suggested that shuttling autoantigens into the intracellular milieu of phagocytes is an important trigger of inflammatory cytokine responses in patients with SLE (Munoz et al., 2009). SNEC–IC containing nucleic acids can be considered as a binary pyrogen able to induce much more damage than its single components apart (Munoz et al., 2010b). Since patients with SLE continuously produce SNEC, we proposed SNEC–IC as a lupus “pathogen” playing a role in the chronification of inflammation in patients with SLE (Munoz et al., 2010c). In the actual work we have demonstrated that not properly cleared SNEC displays not only dsDNA on its surface but binding sites for several further opsonins. Employing inert particles we showed the presence of binding sites for anti-dsDNA and for CRP on the surfaces of SNEC. These are accessible to be recognized by opsonins, autoantibodies, and finally by phagocytes. CRP reportedly binds to SNEC via (lyso)phosphatidylcholine of disturbed membranes (Volanakis and Wirtz, 1979), to nuclear components like histones (Du Clos et al., 1988), and to snRNPs (Jewell et al., 1993). Such DNA-associated proteins become more accessible after DNA degradation during apoptosis and in post-apoptotic cells (Janko et al., 2009). Anti-CRP autoantibodies have a high prevalence in patients with SLE. This finding has also been reported by several other authors (Bell et al., 1998; Sjowall et al., 2002). The titer of anti-CRP is associated with clinical activity but not with the levels of circulating CRP (Sjowall et al., 2005). It has also been shown that anti-CRP recognizes neo-epitopes of surface bound CRP which displays a monomeric conformation (Bell et al., 1998; Sjowall et al., 2002). The levels of anti-CRP and of anti-dsDNA do not correlate as already been shown by Sjowall et al. (2002). The independency of anti-CRP from anti-dsDNA confers target-bound CRP a role as further autoantigen in autoimmune responses of patients with SLE. In this work we report the ability of sera to sensitize SNEC for phagocytic clearance by macrophages. Enhanced phagocytosis of SNEC by macrophages is observed in all conditions where anti-dsDNA or anti-CRP, or both are present. We previously reported that anti-dsDNA sensitize SNEC and enhance their uptake by blood–borne phagocytes (Munoz et al., 2009, 2010a). Macrophages play a very important role in the swift engulfment of dying cells (Voll et al., 1997). The involvement of these professional phagocytes in the aberrant clearance process may have additional deleterious consequences for patients with SLE, which often show an impaired clearance capability. During an acute phase response CRP usually increases dramatically. In patients with SLE CRP is not considered as a marker for inflammation – often CRP levels increase only moderately during flares. This is in striking contrast to other rheumatic diseases with comparable amounts of tissue inflammation such as RA and gout (Becker et al., 1980). High IFNα levels, prototypic for SLE flares, have been shown to suppress IL-6 induced CRP levels by human hepatocytes in vitro (Enocsson et al., 2009). CRP has early been identified as a component of immune complexes (IC) circulating in the plasma of patients with SLE (Maire et al., 1983). CRP bound to circulating or sessile targets may escape detection, resulting in artificially low values of measurable CRP. In a clearance deficiency scenario where post-apoptotic remnants accumulate, CRP can be massively sequestered by this mechanism. We propose that in patients with SLE dead cell bound CRP is an important target for anti-CRP antibodies compromising the normal clearance process. The complement system and CRP act together as an important backup mechanism for cells that have escaped the early PS-dependent clearance process (Gaipl et al., 2001). After opsonization, CRP activates complement and facilitates silent clearance by macrophages (Gershov et al., 2000). If complement is low, CRP does not enhance the phagocytosis of late apoptotic neutrophils (Hart et al., 2005). To exclude influences of the serum levels of complement of individual sera we performed the phagocytosis assays in the absence of complement. This argues for an Fcγ-receptor involvement during recognition and engulfment by macrophages of sensitized SNEC. Sensibilization of SNEC with either anti-dsDNA or with anti-CRP present in sera from patients with SLE significantly increased the production by macrophages of inflammatory cytokines. We have shown that SNEC exposes binding sites for anti-dsDNA and for CRP on their surfaces and suggest that autoantibodies recognize these targets and thereby form IC that can be taken up by macrophages in an inflammatory fashion. The maximal enhancement of uptake and inflammatory cytokine production was observed employing sera containing both anti-dsDNA and anti-CRP. This observation suggests that concomitant sensibilization with both autoantibody specificities results in a higher density of antibodies bound to the surfaces of the target particles. The spatial vicinity of the Fc portions is critical to trigger Fcγ-receptor mediated phagocytosis (Allen and Aderem, 1996). Kenyon et al. (2011) recently showed that anti-C3 antibodies in sera from autoimmune mice inhibited uptake of apoptotic cells by blocking C3 recognition by mouse macrophages suggesting that autoantibodies against the dead cell opsonin C3 may contribute to a further suppression of apoptotic cell disposal increasing severity and/or exacerbations in SLE (Kenyon et al., 2011). On the first view this contradicts our results. However, phagocytosis assays crucially depend on experimental details. In contrast to the settings of Kenyon et al. (2011) our phagocytosis assays were performed under serum free conditions. After opsonisation, SNEC was washed twice and resuspended in serum free medium. Therefore, only molecules bound to the target-cells influenced the outcome of phagocytosis. We employed anti-dsDNA negative sera from patients with SLE and depleted CRP and anti-SNEC, to analyze if circulating CRP is part of a major IC containing SNEC and anti-CRP. Although the indices of SNEC phagocytosis by macrophages were not increased by opsonisation with CRP and/or sensibilization with anti-CRP, the presence of anti-CRP and SNEC-bound CRP induced a strong TNF response of macrophages. The presence of anti-CRP at the phagocytic synapse formed by phagocytes and SNEC might be decisive to start the signaling process that results in cytokine production. Our findings that anti-opsonin antibodies shift the clearance toward inflammation are in agreement with previous findings by Rovere et al. (1999) who reported that anti-beta 2-GP1 antibodies bound to apoptotic cells skew their immunogenicity, enabling DCs to present their antigen with higher efficiency and secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines. The fact that many opsonins for dead cells are also targeted by IgG autoimmune responses (Table 1) place them in the “crime scene” during the challenge of the tolerance in germinal centers of patients with SLE (Baumann et al., 2002). Anti-CRP in a patient with persistent deficiency for the early anti-inflammatory clearance of apoptotic cells provides the optimal condition to form ternary pro-inflammatory IC composed of anti-CRP, CRP, and SNEC. The Figure 5 shows a schematic representation of the usual and the alternative interactions among SNEC, opsonins, and phagocytes. We conclude that sensibilization by autoantibodies of SNEC, either directly or indirectly, shifts the clearance process by macrophages toward inflammation. The role of the individual receptors involved in this alternative and pathological phagocytosis pathway may differ amongst individual patients.
Figure 5

Schematic representation of the usual interaction between SNEC, opsonins and phagocytes (central). In the presence of autoantibodies, alternative models for the recognition by phagocytes of antibody-sensitized SNEC are represented. Anti-opsonin antibodies, e.g., anti-CRP (left) or directly binding anti-SNEC antibodies, e.g., anti-dsDNA (right) may shift the clearance of SNEC toward inflammation engaging the receptors for Fcγ and complement. In addition to autoantibodies against dsDNA and/or opsonins, low complement levels are prone to influence the clearance of post-apoptotic remnants.

Schematic representation of the usual interaction between SNEC, opsonins and phagocytes (central). In the presence of autoantibodies, alternative models for the recognition by phagocytes of antibody-sensitized SNEC are represented. Anti-opsonin antibodies, e.g., anti-CRP (left) or directly binding anti-SNEC antibodies, e.g., anti-dsDNA (right) may shift the clearance of SNEC toward inflammation engaging the receptors for Fcγ and complement. In addition to autoantibodies against dsDNA and/or opsonins, low complement levels are prone to influence the clearance of post-apoptotic remnants.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  58 in total

1.  Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  M C Hochberg
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1997-09

2.  Autoantibodies to C-reactive protein is a common finding in SLE, but not in primary Sjögren's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis or inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Christopher Sjöwall; Per Eriksson; Sven Almer; Thomas Skogh
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.094

Review 3.  The role of defective clearance of apoptotic cells in systemic autoimmunity.

Authors:  Luis E Muñoz; Kirsten Lauber; Martin Schiller; Angelo A Manfredi; Martin Herrmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 20.543

4.  Apoptotic cell clearance in systemic lupus erythematosus. I. Opsonization by antiphospholipid antibodies.

Authors:  A A Manfredi; P Rovere; G Galati; S Heltai; E Bozzolo; L Soldini; J Davoust; G Balestrieri; A Tincani; M G Sabbadini
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1998-02

5.  Analysis of the binding of C-reactive protein to histones and chromatin.

Authors:  T W Du Clos; L T Zlock; R L Rubin
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1988-12-15       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Identification of a factor that links apoptotic cells to phagocytes.

Authors:  Rikinari Hanayama; Masato Tanaka; Keiko Miwa; Azusa Shinohara; Akihiro Iwamatsu; Shigekazu Nagata
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  IgG opsonized nuclear remnants from dead cells cause systemic inflammation in SLE.

Authors:  Luis E Munoz; Christina Janko; Ricardo A Chaurio; Georg Schett; Udo S Gaipl; Martin Herrmann
Journal:  Autoimmunity       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.815

8.  Phagocytosis and clearance of apoptotic cells is mediated by MER.

Authors:  R S Scott; E J McMahon; S M Pop; E A Reap; R Caricchio; P L Cohen; H S Earp; G K Matsushima
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-10       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Interferon-alpha mediates suppression of C-reactive protein: explanation for muted C-reactive protein response in lupus flares?

Authors:  Helena Enocsson; Christopher Sjöwall; Thomas Skogh; Maija-Leena Eloranta; Lars Rönnblom; Jonas Wetterö
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-12

10.  C-reactive protein does not opsonize early apoptotic human neutrophils, but binds only membrane-permeable late apoptotic cells and has no effect on their phagocytosis by macrophages.

Authors:  Simon P Hart; Karen M Alexander; Shonna M MacCall; Ian Dransfield
Journal:  J Inflamm (Lond)       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 4.981

View more
  17 in total

1.  High throughput fluorometric technique for assessment of macrophage phagocytosis and actin polymerization.

Authors:  Jana Ninković; Sabita Roy
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  New insights into the immunopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  George C Tsokos; Mindy S Lo; Patricia Costa Reis; Kathleen E Sullivan
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Associations of C-reactive protein isoforms with systemic lupus erythematosus phenotypes and disease activity.

Authors:  Jesper Karlsson; Jonas Wetterö; Maria Weiner; Johan Rönnelid; Rafael Fernandez-Botran; Christopher Sjöwall
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells in homeostasis.

Authors:  Sanja Arandjelovic; Kodi S Ravichandran
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 25.606

5.  Sialylation of anti-histone immunoglobulin G autoantibodies determines their capabilities to participate in the clearance of late apoptotic cells.

Authors:  I Magorivska; L E Muñoz; C Janko; T Dumych; J Rech; G Schett; F Nimmerjahn; R Bilyy; M Herrmann
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Bonding the foe - NETting neutrophils immobilize the pro-inflammatory monosodium urate crystals.

Authors:  Christine Schorn; Christina Janko; Veit Krenn; Yi Zhao; Luis E Munoz; Georg Schett; Martin Herrmann
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 7.  Contribution of Defective PS Recognition and Efferocytosis to Chronic Inflammation and Autoimmunity.

Authors:  Stanley Gititu Kimani; Ke Geng; Canan Kasikara; Sushil Kumar; Ganapathy Sriram; Yi Wu; Raymond B Birge
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 8.  Clearance of Apoptotic Bodies, NETs, and Biofilm DNA: Implications for Autoimmunity.

Authors:  Marko Radic
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Macrophages in inflammation and its resolution.

Authors:  Amiram Ariel; Isabelle Maridonneau-Parini; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Jerrold S Levine; Heiko Mühl
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 10.  Pentraxins: structure, function, and role in inflammation.

Authors:  Terry W Du Clos
Journal:  ISRN Inflamm       Date:  2013-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.