Literature DB >> 22566381

Feasibility and safety of 7F sheathless guiding catheter during transradial coronary intervention.

Tak W Kwan1, Sanjay Cherukuri, Yili Huang, Samir Pancholy, Ramesh Daggubati, Michael Liou, John Coppola, Shigeru Saito.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study is to assess the feasibility, safety, and rate of radial artery occlusion (RAO) using 7F sheathless guiding catheter in a large population undergoing transradial intervention (TRI).
BACKGROUND: There is a frequent need for large bore guiding catheter to perform complex coronary interventions. Hydrophilic sheathless guiding catheters are not available in the US, therefore, we present the results of a multicenter study using the modified sheathless technique and readily available catheters.
METHODS: Between December 2010 and February 2011, 116 consecutive patients from four tertiary US centers who underwent TRI using 7F sheathless guiding catheter were included in this study.
RESULTS: In our study of 116 patients with 123 coronary lesions, 57 stenoses (49%) were complex interventions, which included patients with acute coronary syndromes, chronic total occlusion (CTO), bifurcation stenting, calcified lesions, left main artery, and saphenous venous graft interventions. Overall procedural success rate was 95%. At 7-day, there were six patients (5%) with RAO, of which two of the six had severe radial artery spasm during the procedure. At 30-day, the overall persistent RAO was only detected in three patients (2.5%), as three patients had return of antegrade radial artery flow.
CONCLUSIONS: In our multicenter study of 116 consecutive patients, using 7F sheathless guiding catheter to perform TRI is associated with a high procedural success (95%) and a low 30-day RAO rate (2.5%).
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22566381     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  7 in total

Review 1.  Radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization.

Authors:  Grigorios Avdikos; Aris Karatasakis; Andreas Tsoumeleas; Efstathios Lazaris; Antonios Ziakas; Michael Koutouzis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

Review 2.  Transradial Sheathless Approach for PCI.

Authors:  Douglas Fraser; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Using sheathless standard guiding catheters for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention to treat bifurcation lesions.

Authors:  Qiyong Li; Yong He; Rongjian Jiang; Dejia Huang
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013

4.  Safety and efficacy of a non-polymeric paclitaxel-eluting microporous stent in real-world percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Shao-Peng Wang; Rong-Chong Huang; Hao Zhu; Bo Zhang; Zhen-Guo Zheng; DA Yin; Jun-Jie Wang; Xu-Chen Zhou
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Rashid; Chun Shing Kwok; Samir Pancholy; Sanjay Chugh; Sasko A Kedev; Ivo Bernat; Karim Ratib; Adrian Large; Doug Fraser; James Nolan; Mamas A Mamas
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approach in treatment of chronic total occlusions with similar lesion characteristics.

Authors:  Mustafa Ahmet Huyut; Aylin Hatice Yamaç
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.596

7.  Access-site Complications of the Transradial Approach: Rare But Still There.

Authors:  Stelina Alkagiet; Dimitrios Petroglou; Dimitrios N Nikas; Theofilos M Kolettis
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2021
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.