BACKGROUND: Bilateral coronal synostosis (brachycephaly) is the most common single-suture synostosis that may lead to functional deficits such as mental retardation. This increases the importance of volume gain during surgery. This study was designed to understand the differences in volume gain, cranial index (CI), and aesthetic outcomes when additional osteotomies or rotations are applied on the frontoparietal segment. METHODS: Acrylic brachycephaly models were prepared. Frontoparietal osteotomy was standard in all models. Frontoparietal segment was fixed: to the same position in surgical control model, after 1.2-cm advancement in advancement model, after 180-degree rotation without advancement in rotation model, after 180-degree rotation plus a horizontal osteotomy and 1.2-cm advancement in rotation plus angled advancement model, and after a horizontal osteotomy without rotation and 1.2-cm advancement and in angled advancement model. RESULTS: Intracranial volume changes (in milliliters) and CIs were as follows between groups: control group, 828/94.1; surgical control group, 830/93.8; advancement model, 900/84.5; rotation model, 834/89.1; rotation plus angled advancement model, 897/82.7; angled advancement model, 902/81.8. CONCLUSIONS: Advancement of the frontoparietal segment is the keystone of surgery in brachycephaly treatment. Making an additional horizontal osteotomy can angle this segment and may supply additional volume gain. Rotation of the frontoparietal segment does not provide additional volume or CI gain but increase better aesthetic outcomes.
BACKGROUND:Bilateral coronal synostosis (brachycephaly) is the most common single-suture synostosis that may lead to functional deficits such as mental retardation. This increases the importance of volume gain during surgery. This study was designed to understand the differences in volume gain, cranial index (CI), and aesthetic outcomes when additional osteotomies or rotations are applied on the frontoparietal segment. METHODS:Acrylic brachycephaly models were prepared. Frontoparietal osteotomy was standard in all models. Frontoparietal segment was fixed: to the same position in surgical control model, after 1.2-cm advancement in advancement model, after 180-degree rotation without advancement in rotation model, after 180-degree rotation plus a horizontal osteotomy and 1.2-cm advancement in rotation plus angled advancement model, and after a horizontal osteotomy without rotation and 1.2-cm advancement and in angled advancement model. RESULTS: Intracranial volume changes (in milliliters) and CIs were as follows between groups: control group, 828/94.1; surgical control group, 830/93.8; advancement model, 900/84.5; rotation model, 834/89.1; rotation plus angled advancement model, 897/82.7; angled advancement model, 902/81.8. CONCLUSIONS: Advancement of the frontoparietal segment is the keystone of surgery in brachycephaly treatment. Making an additional horizontal osteotomy can angle this segment and may supply additional volume gain. Rotation of the frontoparietal segment does not provide additional volume or CI gain but increase better aesthetic outcomes.
Authors: Kirk Smith; David Politte; Gregory Reiker; Tracy S Nolan; Charles Hildebolt; Chelsea Mattson; Don Tucker; Fred Prior; Sergei Turovets; Linda J Larson-Prior Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2013
Authors: Kyu Won Shim; Min Jin Lee; Myung Chul Lee; Eun Kyung Park; Dong Seok Kim; Helen Hong; Yong Oock Kim Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: William X Z Liaw; William C H Parr; Tim S Peltz; Alex Varey; Jeremy Hunt; Mark Gianoutsos; Damian D Marucci; William Walsh Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2019-04-02