Literature DB >> 2256564

The fracture strength of ceramic brackets: a comparative study.

D A Flores1, J M Caruso, G E Scott, M T Jeiroudi.   

Abstract

Recent demand for esthetic brackets has led to the development and use of ceramic brackets in orthodontics. The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture strength of different ceramic brackets under different surface conditions and ligation methods using a torsional wire bending force. Five different bracket types (two polycrystalline, two single-crystal, and one metal) were tested using elastic and wire ligation, with half being scratched and the other half remaining unscratched. Results showed a significant difference between bracket types and surface conditions. Non-scratched single-crystal brackets had higher fracture strengths and slightly higher fracture loads than polycrystalline brackets. However, single-crystal brackets were significantly adversely affected by surface damage (scratching), while polycrystalline brackets were not significantly affected by surface damage. The fracture behavior of ceramic brackets followed the Griffith model where fracture strength decreased following surface damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2256564     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1990)060<0269:TFSOCB>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  9 in total

1.  Shear Bond Strength of Ceramic Brackets with Different Base Designs: Comparative In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Mohd Younus Ansari; Deepak K Agarwal; Ankur Gupta; Preeti Bhattacharya; Juhi Ansar; Ravi Bhandari
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-11-01

2.  Survey on awareness and preference of ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists.

Authors:  Aileen Y Ngan; Prashanti Bollu; Kishore Chaudhry; Richard Stevens; Karthikeyan Subramani
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-07-01

3.  Finite element study on modification of bracket base and its effects on bond strength.

Authors:  Tarulatha R Shyagali; Deepak P Bhayya; Chandralekha B Urs; Shashikala Subramaniam
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

4.  Torque expression capacity of 0.018 and 0.022 bracket slots by changing archwire material and cross section.

Authors:  Angela Arreghini; Luca Lombardo; Francesco Mollica; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.750

5.  Does the CO2 laser reduce bond strength in different types of ceramic brackets?

Authors:  Fábio Lourenço Romano; Giovanna Pessoti; Rodrigo Galo; Jaciara Miranda Gomes-Silva; Marília Pacífico Lucisano; Maria Cristina Borsatto; Paulo Nelson-Filho
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

6.  Shear bond strength of ceramic and metal brackets bonded to enamel using color-change adhesive.

Authors:  Mohadeseh Delavarian; Farshad Rahimi; Ramin Mohammadi; Mohammad Moslem Imani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug

7.  Shear Bond Strength and Bracket Base Morphology of New and Rebonded Orthodontic Ceramic Brackets.

Authors:  Mihai Urichianu; Steven Makowka; David Covell; Stephen Warunek; Thikriat Al-Jewair
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Effect of cigarette smoke on aesthetic brackets: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Laura Borges; Amanda Cunha Regal de Castro; Carlos Nelson Elias; Margareth Maria Gomes de Souza
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-09-05

Review 9.  Orthodontic Bonding: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ali H Alzainal; Ahmed Shehab Majud; Abdulfatah M Al-Ani; Adil O Mageet
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2020-07-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.