| Literature DB >> 22565481 |
Ali Al-Sarar1, Hamdy Hussein, Yasser Abobakr, Alaa Bayoumi.
Abstract
In this work, we have evaluated the molluscicidal activity of two cardenolide extracts from Adenium arabicum Balf f. [the benzene (B) and methanol (M) extracts], one cardenolide extract from Calotropis procera (Aiton) W.T. Aiton (extract C), and methomyl against the harmful land snail Monacha cantiana (Montagu). The contact LD₅₀ values for the above mentioned plant extracts were 12.62, 34.63, and 34.35 mg·kg⁻¹ of body weight, respectively, while the LD₅₀ for methomyl was 116.62 mg·kg⁻¹, that is, the plant extracts were 9.24, 3.37, and 3.4 times more toxic than methomyl. In addition, a simple colorimetric method, based on Kedde reagent, was modified to determine cardenolide concentrations in plant extracts. Thin layer chromatography analysis (TLC) showed several cardiac glycosidal compounds in each plant extract. The results proved that cardiac glycosides are promising candidate compounds that could be used to control land snails, or exploited to develop new, effective, and environmentally friendly molluscicides.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22565481 PMCID: PMC6268447 DOI: 10.3390/molecules17055310
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Average mortality values (% M) for extracts B, M, and C and methomyl after topical application to Monacha cantiana.
| Extract B | Extract M | Extract C | Methomyl | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose * | % M | Dose * | % M | Dose * | % M | Dose * | % M |
| 20 | 96.7 a | 48 | 93.3 a | 80 | 100.0 a | 200 | 93.3 a |
| 16 | 90.0 a | 42 | 70.0 b | 60 | 93.3 a | 160 | 60.0 b |
| 12 | 40.0 b | 36 | 56.7 c | 40 | 70.0 b | 120 | 46.7 b,c |
| 10 | 13.3 c | 32 | 40.0 d | 30 | 33.3 c | 80 | 40.0 c |
| 60 | 3.3 d | ||||||
| Control | 0.0 c | Control | 0.0 e | Control | 0.0 d | Control | 0.0 d |
| LSD | 14.39 | LSD | 11.40 | LSD | 8.42 | LSD | 15.81 |
* Dose in mg·kg−1; Values followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different at the 0.05 level. (LSD: Least Significant Difference).
Probit analysis for contact toxicity of extracts B, M, and C and methomyl after topical application to Monacha cantiana.
| Material | LD50 * | 95% Fiducial limits | LD 95 | 95% Fiducial limits | Slope ± SE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extract B | 12.62 a | 12.20–13.06 | 18.00 | 16.86–19.21 | 10.68 ± 0.78 |
| Extract M | 34.63 b | 33.22–36.10 | 53.28 | 48.70–58.30 | 8.79 ± 1.19 |
| Extract C | 34.35 b | 32.36–36.45 | 59.66 | 53.82–66.15 | 6.86 ± 0.49 |
| Methomyl | 116.62 c | 109.26–124.48 | 276.92 | 237.45–323.05 | 4.38 ± 0.13 |
* Values followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different at the 0.05 level.
Optical densities* of extracts B, M, and C at 565 nm.
| Conc. (mg·L−1) | Extract B * | Extract M | Extract C |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 0.055 | 0.062 | 0.09 |
| 20 | 0.113 | 0.129 | 0.188 |
| 40 | 0.221 | 0.253 | 0.37 |
| 80 | 0.446 | 0.483 | 0.718 |
* Every value is an average of two replicates.
Figure 1Relationship between the concentrations of B, M and C plant extracts and their corresponding optical densities at 565 nm.