Literature DB >> 22564997

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with methotrexate, cisplatin, and doxorubicin with or without ifosfamide in nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity: an Italian sarcoma group trial ISG/OS-1.

Stefano Ferrari1, Pietro Ruggieri, Graziella Cefalo, Angela Tamburini, Rodolfo Capanna, Franca Fagioli, Alessandro Comandone, Rossella Bertulli, Gianni Bisogno, Emanuela Palmerini, Marco Alberghini, Antonina Parafioriti, Alessandra Linari, Piero Picci, Gaetano Bacci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared two chemotherapy regimens that included methotrexate (MTX), cisplatin (CDP), and doxorubicin (ADM) with or without ifosfamide (IFO) in patients with nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients age ≤ 40 years randomly received regimens with the same cumulative doses of drugs (ADM 420 mg/m(2), MTX 120 g/m(2), CDP 600 mg/m(2), and IFO 30 g/m(2)) but with different durations (arm A, 44 weeks; arm B, 34 weeks). IFO was given postoperatively when pathologic response to MTX-CDP-ADM was poor (arm A) or given in the primary phase of chemotherapy with MTX-CDP-ADM (arm B). End points of the study included pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy, toxicity, and survival. Given the feasibility of accrual, the statistical plan only permitted detection of a 15% difference in 5-year overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: From April 2001 to December 2006, 246 patients were enrolled. Two hundred thirty patients (94%) underwent limb salvage surgery (arm A, 92%; arm B, 96%; P = .5). Chemotherapy-induced necrosis was good in 45% of patients (48% in arm A, 42% in arm B; P = .3). Four patients died of treatment-related toxicity (arm A, n = 1; arm B, n = 3). A significantly higher incidence of hematologic toxicity was reported in arm B. With a median follow-up of 66 months (range, 1 to 104 months), 5-year OS and event-free survival (EFS) rates were not significantly different between arm A and arm B, with OS being 73% (95% CI, 65% to 81%) in arm A and 74% (95% CI, 66% to 82%) in arm B and EFS being 64% (95% CI, 56% to 73%) in arm A and 55% (95% CI, 46% to 64%) in arm B.
CONCLUSION: IFO added to MTX, CDP, and ADM from the preoperative phase does not improve the good responder rate and increases hematologic toxicity. IFO should only be considered in patients who have a poor histologic response to MTX, CDP, and ADM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22564997     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.4420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  64 in total

1.  Mifamurtide in metastatic and recurrent osteosarcoma: a patient access study with pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety assessments.

Authors:  P M Anderson; P Meyers; E Kleinerman; K Venkatakrishnan; D P Hughes; C Herzog; W Huh; R Sutphin; Y M Vyas; V Shen; A Warwick; N Yeager; C Oliva; B Wang; Y Liu; A Chou
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  CORR Insights(®): survival, recurrence, and function after epiphyseal preservation and allograft reconstruction in osteosarcoma of the knee.

Authors:  Nicola Fabbri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Prognostic significance of serum lactate dehydrogenase level in osteosarcoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Meng-xiong Sun; Ying-qi Hua; Zheng-dong Cai
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Neoadjuvant cisplatin plus temozolomide versus standard treatment in patients with unresectable glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma: a differential effect of MGMT methylation.

Authors:  Laia Capdevila; Sara Cros; Jose-Luis Ramirez; Carolina Sanz; Cristina Carrato; Margarita Romeo; Olatz Etxaniz; Cristina Hostalot; Ana Massuet; Jose Luis Cuadra; Salvador Villà; Carmen Balañà
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Is it important to maintain high-dose intensity chemotherapy in the treatment of adults with osteosarcoma?

Authors:  I Kushnir; Y Kolander; J Bickels; Y Gortzak; G Flusser; J Issakov; O Merimsky
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of osteosarcoma in adults-2013.

Authors:  A Redondo; J Cruz; A Lopez-Pousa; F Barón
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  GFRA1 promotes cisplatin-induced chemoresistance in osteosarcoma by inducing autophagy.

Authors:  Mihwa Kim; Ji-Yeon Jung; Seungho Choi; Hyunseung Lee; Liza D Morales; Jeong-Tae Koh; Sun Hun Kim; Yoo-Duk Choi; Chan Choi; Thomas J Slaga; Won Jae Kim; Dae Joon Kim
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 16.016

Review 8.  Advancing therapy for osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Jonathan Gill; Richard Gorlick
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Telangiectatic osteosarcoma: a review of 87 cases.

Authors:  Andrea Angelini; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Giulia Trovarelli; Stefano Ferrari; Piero Picci; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 10.  Targeting Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Treatment Efficacy and Resistance in Osteosarcoma: A Review of Current and Future Strategies.

Authors:  Ingrid Lilienthal; Nikolas Herold
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.