Literature DB >> 22564927

Long-term complications of office hysteroscopy: analysis of 1028 cases.

T C van Kerkvoorde1, S Veersema, A Timmermans.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the long-term complication rate of office hysteroscopy with the vaginoscopic approach.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-A).
SETTING: University-affiliated teaching hospital with outpatient hysteroscopy facilities. PATIENTS: Between January 2005 and October 2007, all consecutive patients undergoing office hysteroscopy with the vaginoscopic approach were analyzed, 1028 procedures in total.
INTERVENTIONS: Therapeutic or diagnostic office hysteroscopy with the vaginoscopic approach. The complication registration of the gynecology department and a random sample of one third of the medical records were analyzed for long-term complications.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 1028 hysteroscopic procedures, 622 (60%) were diagnostic, 328 (32%) were therapeutic hysteroscopic procedures, and 78 (8%) procedures failed. In the complication registration and in the medical charts, 1 significant complication could be identified.
CONCLUSIONS: Office hysteroscopy with the vaginoscopic approach is a safe procedure. This study showed an extremely low risk of long-term complications.
Copyright © 2012 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22564927     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  3 in total

1.  Safety considerations for office-based obstetric and gynecologic procedures.

Authors:  Richard D Urman; Nathan Punwani; Maryanne Bombaugh; Fred E Shapiro
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Management of anxiety and pain perception in women undergoing office hysteroscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Salvatore Caruso; Michal Ciebiera; Péter Török; Jan Tesarik; George Angelos Vilos; Aarathi Cholkeri-Singh; Ferdinando Antonio Gulino; Mohan Shashikant Kamath; Antonio Cianci
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  A Pilot Study Comparing Hysteroscopic Adhesiolysis by Conventional Resectoscope Versus Mini-resectoscope.

Authors:  Kallol Kumar Roy; Archana Lingampally; Yamini Kansal; Juhi Bharti; Sunesh Kumar; Perumal Vanamail; Seema Singhal; Jyoti Meena
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2017-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.