Literature DB >> 22564806

Early and late prognostic implications of coronary artery bypass timing after myocardial infarction.

Dumbor L Ngaage1, Franco Sogliani, Augustine Tang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The optimal timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after myocardial infarction (MI) is still controversial. With advances in perioperative care and myocardial protection, CABG is not infrequently undertaken sooner. Although CABG soon after MI is associated with high morbidity and mortality, the impact of CABG timing on late survival is not clear.
METHODS: We analysed prospectively collected data for 8320 patients who underwent primary CABG from 1996 through 2010. Operative outcomes and late survival were compared between patient categories based on MI-to-CABG days: groups A (0-30, n = 658), B (31-60, n = 734), C (>90, n = 2698) and D (no MI, n = 4230). The effect of the timing of surgery on survival was determined using multivariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses.
RESULTS: As the MI-to-CABG interval increased, the frequency of urgent/emergency operations decreased and hospital mortality (A, 3.5% vs B, 2.6% vs C, 1.2%, vs D, 1.1%, P < 0.0001) steadily declined. In general, patients who had CABG within 90 days of MI had more cardiac morbidity and co-morbidities. Expectedly, therefore, postoperative organ system dysfunction (cardiac, renal, respiratory and neurological) was more frequent in these groups. Reoperation for bleeding was similar for all groups, but blood product transfusion decreased as the MI-to-CABG days increased. The 10-year survival improved with the MI-to-CABG interval (A, 72.2% vs B, 73.4% vs C, 75.8% vs D, 81.4%, P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, the MI-to-CABG interval was not a risk factor for operative or late mortality. However, less frequent were left internal mammary artery use, non-elective surgery and high blood transfusion rates; all more often associated with shorter MI-to-CABG intervals.
CONCLUSIONS: Early and late mortality risk for CABG declines with increasing interval from MI for reasons indirectly linked to the timing of surgery. Our findings emphasize the importance of preoperative organ system optimization and consistent left internal mammary artery use, regardless of the proximity of surgery to MI or the exigency of surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22564806     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  4 in total

1.  Does Preoperative Troponin Level Impact Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?

Authors:  Jared P Beller; Robert B Hawkins; J Hunter Mehaffey; Damien J LaPar; Irving L Kron; Leora T Yarboro; Gorav Ailawadi; Ravi K Ghanta
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Optimal Timing of Surgical Revascularization for Myocardial Infarction and Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

Authors:  Rong Wang; Nan Cheng; Cang-Song Xiao; Yang Wu; Xiao-Yong Sai; Zhi-Yun Gong; Yao Wang; Chang-Qing Gao
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction: does it influence outcomes?

Authors:  Anton Prem Thilak; Devika Thacker; Sufina Shales; Debasis Das; Sukanta Kumar Behera; Arup Kumar Ghosh; Pradeep Narayan
Journal:  Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol       Date:  2021-05-15

4.  Early surgical myocardial revascularization in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Sebastian V Rojas; Mai Linh Trinh-Adams; Aitor Uribarri; Felix Fleissner; Pavel Iablonskii; Sara Rojas-Hernandez; Marcel Ricklefs; Andreas Martens; Stefan Rümke; Gregor Warnecke; Serghei Cebotari; Axel Haverich; Issam Ismail
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.895

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.