K M Park1, H M Woo. 1. Stem Cell Institute-KNU, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea. oh_miracle@hanmail.net
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Bioscaffolds derived from animal organs are promising materials for xenotransplantation and regenerative medicine. For effective generation of biological scaffolds from diverse organs, there have been many technical challenges. In this study, we introduced a novel approach to create multiorgan bioscaffolds through systemic decellularization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To obtain acellular bioscaffolds, the healthy adult rats were systemically perfused with ionic detergent through the carotid artery. Additional liver perfusion was set up to prevent potential obstruction from the influx of the decellularized debris via the portal vein. The perfusion system was controlled to maintain a constant physiological cardiac output of approximately 50 mL/min and was designed to minimize air entrapment. After decellularization, every organ designated for bioscaffold was harvested for evaluation of vascular structure and histology. RESULTS: The perfusion times were different for each organ. In our histological analysis, the decellularized bioscaffolds harvested from most organs including major solid organs (ie, heart, liver, and kidney) as well as the others (such as stomach, intestines, spleen, etc) represented no evidence of residual cellular materials. Furthermore, the well-preserved collagen materials and intact vascular structures were also confirmed. CONCLUSION: The results from this study suggested that this systemic decellularization has the advantages to obtain a variety of bioscaffolds from single donor, and we can even decellularize organs with complex influx vascular structures. This method may also be used to study organ bioengineering for patients who need simultaneous combined organ transplantation.
INTRODUCTION: Bioscaffolds derived from animal organs are promising materials for xenotransplantation and regenerative medicine. For effective generation of biological scaffolds from diverse organs, there have been many technical challenges. In this study, we introduced a novel approach to create multiorgan bioscaffolds through systemic decellularization. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To obtain acellular bioscaffolds, the healthy adult rats were systemically perfused with ionic detergent through the carotid artery. Additional liver perfusion was set up to prevent potential obstruction from the influx of the decellularized debris via the portal vein. The perfusion system was controlled to maintain a constant physiological cardiac output of approximately 50 mL/min and was designed to minimize air entrapment. After decellularization, every organ designated for bioscaffold was harvested for evaluation of vascular structure and histology. RESULTS: The perfusion times were different for each organ. In our histological analysis, the decellularized bioscaffolds harvested from most organs including major solid organs (ie, heart, liver, and kidney) as well as the others (such as stomach, intestines, spleen, etc) represented no evidence of residual cellular materials. Furthermore, the well-preserved collagen materials and intact vascular structures were also confirmed. CONCLUSION: The results from this study suggested that this systemic decellularization has the advantages to obtain a variety of bioscaffolds from single donor, and we can even decellularize organs with complex influx vascular structures. This method may also be used to study organ bioengineering for patients who need simultaneous combined organ transplantation.
Authors: Wessam Hassanein; Mehmet C Uluer; John Langford; Jhade D Woodall; Arielle Cimeno; Urmil Dhru; Avraham Werdesheim; Joshua Harrison; Carlos Rivera-Pratt; Stephen Klepfer; Ali Khalifeh; Bryan Buckingham; Philip S Brazio; Dawn Parsell; Charlie Klassen; Cinthia Drachenberg; Rolf N Barth; John C LaMattina Journal: Organogenesis Date: 2016-12-28 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Karl Hillebrandt; Dietrich Polenz; Antje Butter; Peter Tang; Anja Reutzel-Selke; Andreas Andreou; Hendrik Napierala; Nathanael Raschzok; Johann Pratschke; Igor M Sauer; Benjamin Struecker Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Matthew J Webber; Omar F Khan; Stefanie A Sydlik; Benjamin C Tang; Robert Langer Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Panagiotis Maghsoudlou; Fanourios Georgiades; Holly Smith; Anna Milan; Panicos Shangaris; Luca Urbani; Stavros P Loukogeorgakis; Benedetta Lombardi; Giuseppe Mazza; Charlotte Hagen; Neil J Sebire; Mark Turmaine; Simon Eaton; Alessandro Olivo; Jasminka Godovac-Zimmermann; Massimo Pinzani; Paul Gissen; Paolo De Coppi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rebecca G Wells; Neil D Theise; Odise Cenaj; Douglas H R Allison; Rami Imam; Briana Zeck; Lilly M Drohan; Luis Chiriboga; Jessica Llewellyn; Cheng Z Liu; Young Nyun Park Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2021-03-31
Authors: Matthew J Robertson; Jessica L Dries-Devlin; Stefan M Kren; Jana S Burchfield; Doris A Taylor Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 3.240