Literature DB >> 22564160

Awareness is necessary for extracting patterns in working memory but not for directing spatial attention.

Po-Jang Hsieh1, Jaron T Colas.   

Abstract

The contents of working memory (WM) have predominantly been viewed as necessarily conscious. However, recent findings suggest otherwise. Here we investigate whether visual WM can represent subliminal stimuli, such that the positions of an invisible moving object can be extrapolated or learned about in terms of their task-relevant predictive power. We presented a moving cue subliminally and measured subjects' performance on an orientation-discrimination task at the naturally anticipated location on the cue's trajectory and at variably predictable off-trajectory locations. Our data show that orientation discriminability at the on-trajectory location was not significantly different from that at a nearby off-trajectory location. However, orientation discriminability at locations near the final position of the cue was significantly better than that at distal locations. This finding suggests that a moving object can still attract attention when presented subliminally. In contrast, the dynamic trajectory of the object and its task-relevant predictive patterns may not be monitored and maintained in visual WM.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22564160     DOI: 10.1037/a0028345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Complex Interplay Between Multisensory Integration and Perceptual Awareness.

Authors:  O Deroy; N Faivre; C Lunghi; C Spence; M Aller; U Noppeney
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.286

2.  Unconscious processing of facial attractiveness: invisible attractive faces orient visual attention.

Authors:  Shao-Min Hung; Chih-Hsuan Nieh; Po-Jang Hsieh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Visual mismatch negativity to masked stimuli presented at very brief presentation rates.

Authors:  Maria Flynn; Alki Liasis; Mark Gardner; Tony Towell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Separate requirements for detection and perceptual stability of motion in interocular suppression.

Authors:  Egor Ananyev; Trevor B Penney; Po-Jang Brown Hsieh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Predictions from masked motion with and without obstacles.

Authors:  Ariel Goldstein; Ido Rivlin; Alon Goldstein; Yoni Pertzov; Ran R Hassin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.