William S Stone1, Lisa Iguchi. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
STUDY BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia and autism are both neurodevelopmental disorders that were once considered to be the same disorder expressed in different developmental periods. Although they were separated diagnostically about 40 years ago, they share several clinical and possibly, etiological features. This paper reviews overlaps in four domains of function to consider the issue of whether these similarities are sporadic and likely to represent superficial similarities, or whether the disorders are more likely to share some features in common. METHODS: Representative areas of function were reviewed and compared for aspects of cognition (nonverbal reasoning, memory and language), social function (orienting/joint attention, eye contact and theory of mind), brain function (structural differences) and genetics. To facilitate comparisons with schizophrenia, a focus on high functioning autism/Asperger's disorder was utilized, particularly in the sections on cognition and social function. RESULTS: Significant similarities (and differences) characterized comparisons in each domain. CONCLUSIONS: Disturbed function in similar clinical (in cognition and social function), neurobiological (brain volumes) and genetic (e.g., involvement of the same genes or chromosomal locations) domains in autism and schizophrenia supports the hypothesis that while they are distinct disorders, they are not entirely unique. Additional studies of similarities and differences between them may thus shed light on common etiological mechanisms and hopefully, facilitate the development of novel treatment targets.
STUDY BACKGROUND:Schizophrenia and autism are both neurodevelopmental disorders that were once considered to be the same disorder expressed in different developmental periods. Although they were separated diagnostically about 40 years ago, they share several clinical and possibly, etiological features. This paper reviews overlaps in four domains of function to consider the issue of whether these similarities are sporadic and likely to represent superficial similarities, or whether the disorders are more likely to share some features in common. METHODS: Representative areas of function were reviewed and compared for aspects of cognition (nonverbal reasoning, memory and language), social function (orienting/joint attention, eye contact and theory of mind), brain function (structural differences) and genetics. To facilitate comparisons with schizophrenia, a focus on high functioning autism/Asperger's disorder was utilized, particularly in the sections on cognition and social function. RESULTS: Significant similarities (and differences) characterized comparisons in each domain. CONCLUSIONS: Disturbed function in similar clinical (in cognition and social function), neurobiological (brain volumes) and genetic (e.g., involvement of the same genes or chromosomal locations) domains in autism and schizophrenia supports the hypothesis that while they are distinct disorders, they are not entirely unique. Additional studies of similarities and differences between them may thus shed light on common etiological mechanisms and hopefully, facilitate the development of novel treatment targets.
Authors: Shaun M Eack; Deborah P Greenwald; Susan S Hogarty; Susan J Cooley; Ann Louise DiBarry; Debra M Montrose; Matcheri S Keshavan Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Cynthia Mills Schumann; Julia Hamstra; Beth L Goodlin-Jones; Linda J Lotspeich; Hower Kwon; Michael H Buonocore; Cathy R Lammers; Allan L Reiss; David G Amaral Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2004-07-14 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Esther Pousa; Rosó Duñó; Gildas Brébion; Anthony S David; Ada I Ruiz; Jordi E Obiols Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2007-12-31 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Gustav Kuhn; Valerie Benson; Sue Fletcher-Watson; Hanna Kovshoff; Cristin A McCormick; Julie Kirkby; Sue R Leekam Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Shane E McCarthy; Vladimir Makarov; George Kirov; Anjene M Addington; Jon McClellan; Seungtai Yoon; Diana O Perkins; Diane E Dickel; Mary Kusenda; Olga Krastoshevsky; Verena Krause; Ravinesh A Kumar; Detelina Grozeva; Dheeraj Malhotra; Tom Walsh; Elaine H Zackai; Paige Kaplan; Jaya Ganesh; Ian D Krantz; Nancy B Spinner; Patricia Roccanova; Abhishek Bhandari; Kevin Pavon; B Lakshmi; Anthony Leotta; Jude Kendall; Yoon-Ha Lee; Vladimir Vacic; Sydney Gary; Lilia M Iakoucheva; Timothy J Crow; Susan L Christian; Jeffrey A Lieberman; T Scott Stroup; Terho Lehtimäki; Kaija Puura; Chad Haldeman-Englert; Justin Pearl; Meredith Goodell; Virginia L Willour; Pamela Derosse; Jo Steele; Layla Kassem; Jessica Wolff; Nisha Chitkara; Francis J McMahon; Anil K Malhotra; James B Potash; Thomas G Schulze; Markus M Nöthen; Sven Cichon; Marcella Rietschel; Ellen Leibenluft; Vlad Kustanovich; Clara M Lajonchere; James S Sutcliffe; David Skuse; Michael Gill; Louise Gallagher; Nancy R Mendell; Nick Craddock; Michael J Owen; Michael C O'Donovan; Tamim H Shaikh; Ezra Susser; Lynn E Delisi; Patrick F Sullivan; Curtis K Deutsch; Judith Rapoport; Deborah L Levy; Mary-Claire King; Jonathan Sebat Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-10-25 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Sven Sandin; Paul Lichtenstein; Ralf Kuja-Halkola; Henrik Larsson; Christina M Hultman; Abraham Reichenberg Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-05-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elizabeth A Martin; Amanda McCleery; Melody M Moore; Jonathan K Wynn; Michael F Green; William P Horan Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 2.997