Literature DB >> 2256348

Breast reconstruction: progress in the past decade.

L F Elliott1, C R Hartrampf.   

Abstract

There have been numerous advances in breast reconstruction techniques of the past decade. The disappearance of the radical mastectomy along with the increased frequency of smaller tumor detection have contributed significantly to these changes. Furthermore, reliable studies have shown that breast reconstruction does not interfere with extirpative surgery or delay postoperative adjuvant therapy if indicated. Studies such as these have led increasing numbers of women to elect immediate breast reconstruction as opposed to delaying that reconstruction for months or even years after the tumor extirpation. The advent of successful breast reconstruction using autogenous tissue provided the most radical change to reconstructive techniques over the past 10 years. The TRAM (transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous) flap was the first of these techniques to be introduced and has rapidly assumed a position of prominence among those techniques chosen for breast reconstruction. The LTTF (lateral transverse thigh flap) and the buttock flap, while requiring microsurgical technique, are important alternatives for those patients who choose autogenous tissue breast reconstruction and should be presented to women during the discussion of alternatives for breast reconstruction. Implant technology has continued to improve with the introduction of the tissue expander, the most important addition in the past decade. Investigations are currently underway to provide a long-term tissue expander that does not have to be removed and replaced by a permanent implant. The ultimate end result would be to create a more normal breast shape without firmness. And the use of stacked or directional expanders may allow more freedom in creation of the new breast shape to conform to the opposite side. Finally, nipple areola reconstruction has improved significantly as the tissues of the breast mound itself are used for the new nipple and areola, thereby avoiding the transfer of grafts from distant sites which do not generally maintain their size or projection over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2256348     DOI: 10.1007/bf01670523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  38 in total

1.  Using mammography for cancer control: an unrealized potential.

Authors:  J Howard
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  A crisis to grow on.

Authors:  R Klein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Abdominal wall competence in transverse abdominal island flap operations.

Authors:  C R Hartrampf
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  One-stage reconstruction of a projecting nipple: the quadrapod flap.

Authors:  J W Little; T Munasifi; D T McCulloch
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Psychosocial issues in breast reconstruction. Intrapsychic, interpersonal, and practical concerns.

Authors:  W S Schain; E Jacobs; D K Wellisch
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 2.017

6.  A dermal-fat flap for nipple reconstruction.

Authors:  C R Hartrampf; J H Culbertson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  A lower thoracic advancement flap in breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

Authors:  J J Ryan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Psychosocial correlates of immediate versus delayed reconstruction of the breast.

Authors:  D K Wellisch; W S Schain; R B Noone; J W Little
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  The psychological impact of immediate breast reconstruction for women with early breast cancer.

Authors:  L A Stevens; M H McGrath; R G Druss; S J Kister; F E Gump; K A Forde
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Survey of patients' responses to breast reconstruction.

Authors:  B Teimourian; M N Adham
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 1.539

View more
  5 in total

1.  History of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Theodore W Uroskie; Lawrence B Colen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Breast reconstruction at a district general hospital.

Authors:  A A Evans; V F Straker; R M Rainsbury
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Prosthetic breast reconstruction: indications and update.

Authors:  Tam T Quinn; George S Miller; Marie Rostek; Miguel S Cabalag; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

4.  Assessment of the abdominal wall function after pedicled TRAM flap surgery for breast reconstruction: Use of modified mesh repair for the donor defect.

Authors:  Chacko Cyriac; Ramesh Kumar Sharma; Gurpreet Singh
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2010-07

Review 5.  Submuscular and Pre-Pectoral ADM Assisted Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Roberto Cuomo
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.