BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stent (DES) underexpansion has been reported as an independent factor for restenosis and thrombosis; therefore, adequate plaque modification prior to DES implantation is the key of calcified lesion treatment. METHODS: Consecutive patients with severely calcified lesions undergoing rotational atherectomy (RA) followed by balloon dilatation before DES implantation were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the balloon type before stent implantation: the cutting balloon (ROTACUT group) and the plain balloon (control group). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with 26 calcified lesions were identified: 10 patients (10 lesions) were included in the ROTACUT group and 15 patients (16 lesions) in the control group. There were statistically no differences in the final burr size (1.65 ± 0.21 mm vs 1.67 ± 0.22 mm; P=.803), the maximum (max) balloon diameter before stent implantation (2.85 ± 0.34 mm vs 2.72 ± 0.42 mm; P=.411), the max final balloon diameter (3.30 ± 0.33 mm vs 3.28 ± 0.44 mm; P=.908), and the max final balloon inflation pressure (15.3 ± 3.0 atm vs 16.4 ± 5.5 atm; P=.501). Final minimum stent cross-sectional area (CSA) was significantly larger in the ROTACUT group compared to the control group (6.80 ± 1.27 mm² vs 5.38 ± 1.89 mm²; P=.048). CONCLUSION: RA followed by cutting balloon plaque modification for DES implantation in severely calcified lesions appears to be more efficacious including significantly larger final stent CSA.
BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stent (DES) underexpansion has been reported as an independent factor for restenosis and thrombosis; therefore, adequate plaque modification prior to DES implantation is the key of calcified lesion treatment. METHODS: Consecutive patients with severely calcified lesions undergoing rotational atherectomy (RA) followed by balloon dilatation before DES implantation were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the balloon type before stent implantation: the cutting balloon (ROTACUT group) and the plain balloon (control group). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients with 26 calcified lesions were identified: 10 patients (10 lesions) were included in the ROTACUT group and 15 patients (16 lesions) in the control group. There were statistically no differences in the final burr size (1.65 ± 0.21 mm vs 1.67 ± 0.22 mm; P=.803), the maximum (max) balloon diameter before stent implantation (2.85 ± 0.34 mm vs 2.72 ± 0.42 mm; P=.411), the max final balloon diameter (3.30 ± 0.33 mm vs 3.28 ± 0.44 mm; P=.908), and the max final balloon inflation pressure (15.3 ± 3.0 atm vs 16.4 ± 5.5 atm; P=.501). Final minimum stent cross-sectional area (CSA) was significantly larger in the ROTACUT group compared to the control group (6.80 ± 1.27 mm² vs 5.38 ± 1.89 mm²; P=.048). CONCLUSION: RA followed by cutting balloon plaque modification for DES implantation in severely calcified lesions appears to be more efficacious including significantly larger final stent CSA.