Literature DB >> 22562790

Correlation of coracoid thickness and glenoid width: an anatomic morphometric analysis.

Rogerio Serpone Bueno1, Roberto Yukio Ikemoto, Luis Gustavo Prata Nascimento, Luiz Henrique de Oliveira Almeida, Eric Strose, Joel Murachovsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The coracoid has been widely used as a graft to reconstruct anterior glenoid bone defects, as described by the Latarjet and Bristow procedures, with successful results. Nevertheless, at the present, there are no studies correlating the size of the coracoid graft and its relation to the glenoid.
PURPOSE: To assess the mediolateral (M-L) and anteroposterior (A-P) thickness of the coracoid process as well as the widest anterior-to-posterior glenoid distance (glenoid width) and to analyze the correlation between these measurements, while comparing these with the A-P coracoid process thickness. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS: Sixty-one unpaired, adult human cadaveric scapulae were evaluated. Three examiners performed 3 independent measurements of the largest M-L thickness of the coracoid process and also the widest anterior-to-posterior distance of the glenoid. The A-P coracoid process thickness was also measured to compare for correlations with M-L coracoid thickness.
RESULTS: The glenoid width was 26.38 ± 2.69 mm (range, 20.03-32.35 mm), and the M-L coracoid thickness was 14.51 ± 1.90 mm (range, 9.60-19.31 mm). Calculating the ratio between the M-L thickness of the coracoid and glenoid width, we observed that the coracoid represented 43% to 70% of the glenoid width (54% on average). The A-P coracoid process thickness was 8.37 ± 0.93 mm (range, 6.61-9.76 mm), representing 31% of the glenoid width on average.
CONCLUSION: A strong positive and statistically significant relationship between the coracoid process M-L thickness and the anterior-to-posterior glenoid width exists; the coracoid represents, on average, 54% of the glenoid width. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Most cases of glenoid bone loss in recurrent shoulder dislocation can be reconstructed with the coracoid process to re-establish its anatomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22562790     DOI: 10.1177/0363546512445997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  9 in total

1.  Coracoid graft positioning in the Latarjet procedure.

Authors:  Tobias M Kraus; Nicolas Graveleau; Yoann Bohu; Erwan Pansard; Shahnaz Klouche; Philippe Hardy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Bone-mediated anteroinferior glenohumeral instability : Current concepts.

Authors:  A Lädermann; E Böhm; E Tay; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Calculating anterior glenoid bone loss using the Bernageau profile view.

Authors:  Joel Murachovsky; Rogerio S Bueno; Luis Gustavo P Nascimento; Luiz Henrique Oliveira Almeida; Eric Strose; Marcello T Castiglia; Heverton C de Oliveira; Roberto Y Ikemoto
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  [Current concepts of diagnostic techniques and measurement methods for bone defect in patient with anterior shoulder instability].

Authors:  Zhengfeng Pan; Fuguo Huang; Jian Li; Xin Tang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-06-15

5.  Anatomic Variation in Morphometry of Human Coracoid Process among Asian Population.

Authors:  Manal Fathi; Pike-See Cheah; Umar Ahmad; M Nizlan Nasir; Aye Aye San; Ezamin Abdul Rahim; Paisal Hussin; Rozi Mahmud; Fauziah Othman
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Radiological study of the Asian coracoid process and clavicle: Implications for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Chi Loong Jen; Dong Hao Toon; Chung Hui Tan
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2019-11-13

7.  Relationship between the Thickness of the Coracoid Process and Latarjet Graft Positioning-An Anatomical Study on 70 Embalmed Scapulae.

Authors:  Markus Gregori; Lukas Eichelberger; Claudia Gahleitner; Stefan Hajdu; Michael Pretterklieber
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Morphometric analysis of the coracoid process and glenoid width: a 3D-CT study.

Authors:  Yaofei Jia; Na He; Jiaxin Liu; Guangrui Zhang; Jianping Zhou; Ding Wu; Baomin Wei; Xiangdong Yun
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  An anthropometric evaluation of the scapula, with emphasis on the coracoid process and glenoid fossa in a South African population.

Authors:  R Khan; K S Satyapal; L Lazarus; N Naidoo
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-12-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.