Literature DB >> 22562442

Nail projectiles propelled by a mason's lacing cord: an experimental approach.

Matthias Frank1, Rico Grossjohann, Wolfgang Schikorr, Ralf Tesch, Jörn Lange, Axel Ekkernkamp, Sönke Langner, Britta Bockholdt, Frank Tost.   

Abstract

The recent clinical observation of two unintentional penetrating ocular and cerebral injuries due to 90-mm construction nails gave occasion to an experimental study to check the alleged trauma mechanism for plausibility. Both casualties reported that they had attached a mason's lacing cord to the masonry using a nail as anchoring when suddenly the nail was yanked from its moorings and propelled like a missile by the overstretched lacing cord. As to the best of the authors' knowledge, this mechanism of injury has not yet been reported in any of the literature; it was the aim to find an experimental approach to review the plausibility of the alleged sequence of events leading to the accidents. The tensile strength at break and strain at break of different mason's lacing cords (diameter of 1 and 2 mm) were measured according to DIN EN ISO 2062 by using a tensile testing machine. Based on the maximum spring energy of the lacing cords, which was determined 174.9 J for the 1-mm cord (length 10 m) and 747.4 J for the 2-mm cord (length 10 m), the maximum possible velocity of the nails as projectiles was calculated to be 243.5 m/s for the 1-mm cord and 503.4 m/s for the 2-mm cord. The critical elongation a cord of a certain length has to be stretched to deliver enough kinetic energy to a 90-mm nail to surpass the threshold velocity for skin penetration, which was investigated by Sellier (1977) to be approximately 18 m/s, was also calculated. To conclude, the energy delivered by the cords is high enough to surpass the rather low threshold velocity of nails. The details of how these accidents occurred, which seemed questionable at first, can be reasonably explained by trauma biomechanics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22562442     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-012-0707-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  17 in total

Review 1.  A review of nail gun suicides and an atypical case report.

Authors:  Abdulrezzak Shakir; Steven A Koehler; Cyril H Wecht
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.832

2.  Craniofacial metal bolt injury: an unusual mechanism.

Authors:  Kofi O Boahene; Dana M Thompson; Douglas L Schulte; Anthony E Brissett
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2004-03

3.  Penetrating head injury from nailguns: a case series from New Zealand.

Authors:  Mark J Winder; Stephen J Monteith; Nicholas Lightfoot; Edward Mee
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 4.  Industrial nail gun injury to the anterior skull base: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Bernhard J Schaller; Andrea Kleindienst; Tom Kruschat; H Schliephake; Michael Buchfelder; H A Merten
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-03

5.  [Perforating gunshot to the head with a power-actuated tool].

Authors:  Felix Mayer; Michael Lerm; Hildegard Grass
Journal:  Arch Kriminol       Date:  2008 May-Jun

6.  [Deaths caused by so-called bolt-setting guns].

Authors:  E Koops; K Püschel; M Kleiber; W Janssen; G Möller
Journal:  Beitr Gerichtl Med       Date:  1987

7.  Unusual craniocerebral injury caused by a pneumatic nail gun.

Authors:  H Bock; M Neu; P Betz; S Seidl
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2002-03-13       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 8.  Self-inflicted nail-gun injury with 12 cranial penetrations and associated cerebral trauma. Case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Zachary N Litvack; Matthew A Hunt; Jason S Weinstein; G Alexander West
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Ocular nail gun injuries: epidemiology and visual outcomes.

Authors:  Berdine M Burger; Patrick J Kelty; Esther M Bowie
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-12

10.  Multiple self-inflicted nail gun head injury.

Authors:  George M Testerman; Laura M Dacks
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.