Literature DB >> 22562349

Evaluating of arsenic(V) removal from water by weak-base anion exchange adsorbents.

M Rabiul Awual1, M Amran Hossain, M A Shenashen, Tsuyoshi Yaita, Shinichi Suzuki, Akinori Jyo.   

Abstract

Arsenic contamination of groundwater has been called the largest mass poisoning calamity in human history and creates severe health problems. The effective adsorbents are imperative in response to the widespread removal of toxic arsenic exposure through drinking water. Evaluation of arsenic(V) removal from water by weak-base anion exchange adsorbents was studied in this paper, aiming at the determination of the effects of pH, competing anions, and feed flow rates to improvement on remediation. Two types of weak-base adsorbents were used to evaluate arsenic(V) removal efficiency both in batch and column approaches. Anion selectivity was determined by both adsorbents in batch method as equilibrium As(V) adsorption capacities. Column studies were performed in fixed-bed experiments using both adsorbent packed columns, and kinetic performance was dependent on the feed flow rate and competing anions. The weak-base adsorbents clarified that these are selective to arsenic(V) over competition of chloride, nitrate, and sulfate anions. The solution pH played an important role in arsenic(V) removal, and a higher pH can cause lower adsorption capacities. A low concentration level of arsenic(V) was also removed by these adsorbents even at a high flow rate of 250-350 h(-1). Adsorbed arsenic(V) was quantitatively eluted with 1 M HCl acid and regenerated into hydrochloride form simultaneously for the next adsorption operation after rinsing with water. The weak-base anion exchange adsorbents are to be an effective means to remove arsenic(V) from drinking water. The fast adsorption rate and the excellent adsorption capacity in the neutral pH range will render this removal technique attractive in practical use in chemical industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22562349     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-0936-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  22 in total

1.  Arsenic poisoning in the Ganges delta.

Authors:  T R Chowdhury; G K Basu; B K Mandal; B K Biswas; G Samanta; U K Chowdhury; C R Chanda; D Lodh; S L Roy; K C Saha; S Roy; S Kabir; Q Quamruzzaman; D Chakraborti
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-10-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Arsenic removal using a polymeric/inorganic hybrid sorbent.

Authors:  Matthew J DeMarco; Arup K SenGupta; John E Greenleaf
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  Removal of trace arsenic(V) and phosphate from water by a highly selective ligand exchange adsorbent.

Authors:  Md Rabiul Awual; Sherif A El-Safty; Akinori Jyo
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 5.565

4.  Adsorption and removal of arsenic(V) from drinking water by aluminum-loaded Shirasu-zeolite.

Authors:  Yan-hua Xu; Tsunenori Nakajima; Akira Ohki
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  Modeling As(V) removal by a iron oxide impregnated activated carbon using the surface complexation approach.

Authors:  Ronald L Vaughan; Brian E Reed
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 11.236

6.  Arsenic contamination of groundwater and drinking water in Vietnam: a human health threat.

Authors:  M Berg; H C Tran; T C Nguyen; H V Pham; R Schertenleib; W Giger
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  A weak-base fibrous anion exchanger effective for rapid phosphate removal from water.

Authors:  Md Rabiul Awual; Akinori Jyo; Sherif A El-Safty; Masao Tamada; Noriaki Seko
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 10.588

8.  Impact of selected solution factors on arsenate and arsenite removal by nanoiron particles.

Authors:  Visanu Tanboonchuy; Jia-Chin Hsu; Nurak Grisdanurak; Chih-Hsiang Liao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Risk of internal cancers from arsenic in drinking water.

Authors:  K H Morales; L Ryan; T L Kuo; M M Wu; C J Chen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Arsenic-induced skin lesions among Atacameño people in Northern Chile despite good nutrition and centuries of exposure.

Authors:  A H Smith; A P Arroyo; D N Mazumder; M J Kosnett; A L Hernandez; M Beeris; M M Smith; L E Moore
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  5 in total

1.  Efficient arsenic(V) removal from contaminated water using natural clay and clay composite adsorbents.

Authors:  Rauf Foroutan; Reza Mohammadi; Adeyemi S Adeleye; Sima Farjadfard; Zahra Esvandi; Hossein Arfaeinia; George A Sorial; Bahman Ramavandi; Soleyman Sahebi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  New gel-like polymers as selective weak-base anion exchangers.

Authors:  Błażej Gierczyk; Michał Cegłowski; Maciej Zalas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Successive extraction of As(V), Cu(II) and P(V) ions from water using spent coffee powder as renewable bioadsorbents.

Authors:  Linlin Hao; Peng Wang; Suresh Valiyaveettil
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Investigation of novel nanomaterial for the removal of toxic substances from contaminated water.

Authors:  Wessam N El-Sayed; Khalid Z Elwakeel; Ahmed Shahat; Md Rabiul Awual
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.036

5.  As(V) and As(III) sequestration by starch functionalized magnetite nanoparticles: influence of the synthesis route onto the trapping efficiency.

Authors:  Mbolantenaina Rakotomalala Robinson; Romain Coustel; Mustapha Abdelmoula; Martine Mallet
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 8.090

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.